Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you have historical meter readings from before the meters were changed? And more recent history showing consumption, in metered units not in £s,  since the change. One specific thing to check is gas. Check that the meter and the bill use the same units. If the meter is recording cu.m but they're billing as if it was counting 100 cu.ft, then your bill will be nearly three times too high.  Overall I'm guessing it's an Ovo screw up. It's significant that they didn't block the transfer, maybe they aren't so sure of their position.
    • Hmmm, interesting point. In my career, that I am retired from now, there were an immense amount of rules and regulations that one had to adhere to by law. The qualification process is rigorous with on going assessments throughout your career and re-certification every 12 months. If you were shown to be not competent in those rules and regulations you could not hold the position and the operational consequences of that could potentially be dire. In the same respect, perhaps a judge who is not conversant in the rules of POFA should not sit in on cases that requires proficiency in that area? I also bow to your considerable knowledge in this area, perhaps I shouldn't be commenting but by doing so I find it helps the learning process. Your last point has just reminded me of something that may help my case, thank you.
    • Just had an email re the my breache in agreement by her rep.   I asked you yesterday if they had asked about her name in the thread being removed.   The issue they have is the Elizabeth turner and genetic pups entry on google.   they knew I did not put it up and told them so in court.  I dnt know how to post on google.   I told them I cannot remove what I did not post.  when i come back here and saw her name gone from threads title, I presumed her reps sought it.   now I get an email saying her names still on google ur breaching the agreement as it’s still on google.  
    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP not answering phones


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I looked at the DWP report and accounts for 2010/11 and was astonished by what I found.

 

As my username suggests I am in dispute with DWP and therefore I have had to try and phone the Carer's Allowance Unit at Palatine House many times. Because of my caring duties I usually have to phone after about 3.30 pm.

 

My experience is completely opposite to the statistics listed in the PDCS Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 targets (I have a difficulty with URLs on this site because I'm not allowed to post them yet (

 

Telephony

Ensure that at least 93% of calls to our telephone service are answered first time. 94.2%

Ensure that less than 1% of calls to our telephone service receive the

engaged/busy tone 0.2%

 

a) I nearly always get an engaged tone for many attempts

b) if I do get through, it's often to a call centre who offer me a callback service. This callback has come once and that not at the arranged time.

 

Obviously the targets in the Report and Accounts are for the whole service, but even so....

Or is it that some parts of DCS are so good at answering calls that it skews the figures (!)

 

Anecdotal evidence welcome - I'm probably going to take my complaints against DWP to the Parliamentary Ombudsman so any weight to my cause would be very helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the DWP report and accounts for 2010/11 and was astonished by what I found.

 

As my username suggests I am in dispute with DWP and therefore I have had to try and phone the Carer's Allowance Unit at Palatine House many times. Because of my caring duties I usually have to phone after about 3.30 pm.

 

My experience is completely opposite to the statistics listed in the PDCS Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 targets (I have a difficulty with URLs on this site because I'm not allowed to post them yet (

 

Telephony

Ensure that at least 93% of calls to our telephone service are answered first time. 94.2%

Ensure that less than 1% of calls to our telephone service receive the

engaged/busy tone 0.2%

 

a) I nearly always get an engaged tone for many attempts

b) if I do get through, it's often to a call centre who offer me a callback service. This callback has come once and that not at the arranged time.

 

Obviously the targets in the Report and Accounts are for the whole service, but even so....

Or is it that some parts of DCS are so good at answering calls that it skews the figures (!)

 

 

 

Anecdotal evidence welcome - I'm probably going to take my complaints against DWP to the Parliamentary Ombudsman so any weight to my cause would be very helpful.

 

I must have rang them about 20 times over the last 12 months and every single time it was engaged.

 

I've mostly hung on, and every time it was for about 20 minutes.

 

Also the 0845 number is there to discourage people from phoning. If it was a free service they would be swamped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course a lot of the time it is not exactly "engaged" but you get the pleasure of holding and listening to THAT music....at your expense....for ages....

 

I average 10 -20 mins holding each time....but of course that is not "engaged" but nor is it speaking to anyone......

 

And yes the callbacks are promised but not always received and when they are it is almost always dead on 3 hours.

 

God forbid you have to do something else that day and then miss that call though...have to start the process all over again.:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course a lot of the time it is not exactly "engaged" but you get the pleasure of holding and listening to THAT music....at your expense....for ages....

 

I average 10 -20 mins holding each time....but of course that is not "engaged" but nor is it speaking to anyone......

 

And yes the callbacks are promised but not always received and when they are it is almost always dead on 3 hours.

 

God forbid you have to do something else that day and then miss that call though...have to start the process all over again.:sad:

 

 

Right, so that's how they get around it? Might have known.

 

Responding to machines and listening to classical music is classed as getting through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the DWP report and accounts for 2010/11 and was astonished by what I found.

 

As my username suggests I am in dispute with DWP and therefore I have had to try and phone the Carer's Allowance Unit at Palatine House many times. Because of my caring duties I usually have to phone after about 3.30 pm.

 

My experience is completely opposite to the statistics listed in the PDCS Annual Report and Accounts 2010/11 targets (I have a difficulty with URLs on this site because I'm not allowed to post them yet (

 

Telephony

Ensure that at least 93% of calls to our telephone service are answered first time. 94.2%

Ensure that less than 1% of calls to our telephone service receive the

engaged/busy tone 0.2%

 

a) I nearly always get an engaged tone for many attempts

b) if I do get through, it's often to a call centre who offer me a callback service. This callback has come once and that not at the arranged time.

 

Obviously the targets in the Report and Accounts are for the whole service, but even so....

Or is it that some parts of DCS are so good at answering calls that it skews the figures (!)

 

Anecdotal evidence welcome - I'm probably going to take my complaints against DWP to the Parliamentary Ombudsman so any weight to my cause would be very helpful.

Those figures are absolute bull. And thats to put it nicely.

 

I have rang the jobcentre (sometimes different departments) for various reasons (both for myself, and MIL) around 100 times over the past few years. And not once have I ever got straight through. Infact I am generally in the quene for at LEAST 15 mins, usually longer :/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was once told by someone at JCP not to phone on a Monday; as it's impossible to get through. I once phoned on a Tuesday afternoon and was on hold for at least 15 minutes. Glad it was a freephone (fresh ESA claim) number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...