Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Action Need big quicktime help


Flagg913
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few months ago Logic Group took me to court over a debt i owed since july

 

i have been making payments to them via standing order...Today i recieved a

 

letter from logic saying they was taking me back to court cause they have not

 

recieved payments in accordance with the court order,I have however made

 

payment every month since the court order started.I have proof via my Bank

 

statements proving that logic have been payed.Also did notice that i have to

 

pay on the 30th of every month,but the standing orders usually come out two

 

days later....What should i do? Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they set up the standing order, let them take you to Court, if they are whingeing

about the payments being a few days late each month.

 

If you set it up, change the day on the s/o to around the 25th of each month so that your payment gets there for the 30th, not leaves your account on that day.

If you cannot stretch to bringing the amount forward by a few days explain it to

the judge whilst pointing out that you have actually paid every payment with

nothing outstanding since the Court Order.

 

Personally, I doubt that they will take you to Court. Have they written to you at

all pointing out that your money gets to them late?

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they did'nt say anything about late payments, the letter says word for

 

word.....We note from our records that we have not recieved payment in

 

accordance with the court order.We now intend applying to the court for one of

 

the following to enforce all of your judgement debt.

1.Attachment of earnings

2.Warrant of earnings

3.Charging order

4.Third party debt standing order

 

Legal costs and interest will be added to the current judgement debt.

 

Should i give them a ring and ask why?

 

the debt owed says £191.02, but i've been paying since july so it should

 

read £181.02,so they are saying they have'nt recieved my payment i'm guessing.

 

so do you think giving them a ring would help or maybe phoning the courts...Sorry but law is'nt my greatest skill. Thanks for helping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i got a letter from Logic stating that the Northampton County court had

 

ordered me to pay by the 30th of every month, They rang me and said we'll

 

send a standing order form out, fill in the payment of £10 and the date of the 30th

 

then send it back to us, which i did,July,August and September they took

 

Payments out,then yesterday i get letter saying i had not kept to the

 

Agreement.

 

Thanks for the quick response by the way,its very good of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they fixed the date on the standing order I wouldn't worry too much. They had

not received September's money from you, because the 30th was a Saturday.

Your bank would have sent your payment on the 2nd October, not arriving at their

bank till Wednesday at the earliest. And Logic might not get the information from

theri bank till the Thursday. Hence the letter I expect.

 

If they are writing to you because of Septembers payment not being paid on

time no Court will take them seriously.

 

Do not ring them. Conduct all correspondence in writing. Write to them straight away asking how you have breached the arrangement. State that according to your

bank records, your payments are all paid up to date. Ask when they are going to

apply to the Court. Make sure that you send it recorded delivery. Keep a copy

of your letter and keep it with theirs in a file so that you can show your record with them in Court if need be.

 

If all your payments have been paid on the due date, then it maybe that Logic are

using this last payment not getting to them till now as an excuse to get more money from you. You must keep on top of them and answer all their points.

 

Keep us posted as to their reply.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very Brief letter.

 

You may want to alter some or all of this, as this was drafted quickly. Someone else may have a better letter, or wordings so please check.

 

 

Dear Sir

 

Ref:

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated (xxx), and note the contents.

 

I would like to inform you that although you have stated that you have not received payment in accordance with the court order (REF XXXXXXXX), I have within my possession my current Bank statements covering the period (Start Date - Todate); These payments are clearly shown as being paid to yourselves. Therefore I refute your allegation of missed payments.

 

Should, However, you wish to pursue your threat of Court action against me to enforce all of the judgement debt or to add further charges and Interest? Then this will be vigorously defended by me and I will seek costs as appropriate.

 

Should any payments be arriving late to your account, I propose that the date of the standing order be amended to (xxxx Date) each month. This will facilitate in the smooth running of my account with you and should alleviate any further problems.

 

Yours Faithfully

  • Confused 1

If my posts have helped you please use the scales at the top of my posts :)

 

Any opinions from Jannercobbler are strictly my own and I have no affiliation with any group or services.

 

The two most beautiful words in the English Language are "Cheque Enclosed" - Dorothy Parker

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/399-abbey-letter-sent.html

 

Me v Abbey - £3000 + Int + Costs + Credit File Cleaned.

 

LBA Sent 12/3/06

Court Claim started - 31/5/2006

Allocation Questionnaire Filed - 24/7/06

Court Date allocated 31/10/2006

 

Me v Citi-Cards - CCA Sent 27/07/06

Me v Citi-Cards - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Capital One - Data Protection Act Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - CCA Sent 03/08/06

Me v Hillesden Securities - DPA Sent 03/08/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must be a real hassle for logic to receive small payments each month. iI bet they think that you have a secret stash of cash and hope you will settle the account in one go. I am sure the court will laugh logic out of the courtroom. Its an abuse of the system. Des Minimis or some such latin phrase, the amounts are just too little. I agree that you should resolve the issue by bringing the dates forward...thats about all the judge would expect.

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just add that as it was Logic that stipulated the payment date, they can

hardly expect any sympathy from the Court.

If you send Jannercobbler's letter, I doubt that they will even go to Court.

Though I would personally not offer to alter the date of the s/o until I knew what

it was that Logic are actually complaining about. There is no sense in bringing forward the payment date if it is something else they want.

I have amended the letter a little- your choice as to which one you choose. Don't

forget to keep acopy of the one you send.

 

 

Dear Sir

 

Ref:

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated (xxx), and note the contents.

 

I would like to inform you that although you have stated that you have not received payment in accordance with the court order (REF XXXXXXXX), you have

failed to state in what way I have not complied.

 

I have within my possession my current Bank statements covering the period (Start Date - To date); These payments are clearly shown as leaving my account on the due dates in compliance with your standing order, and being paid to yourselves. Therefore I have paid everything according to the Court Order.

 

Should, you still wish to pursue your threat of Court action against me to enforce all of the judgement debt then this will be vigorously defended by me and I will seek costs as appropriate.

 

Yours Faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help,I will write here once i get a reply from logic.Just wondered

 

when i first got the claim form from the courts it said...

Amount claimed £111.02

Court Fee £20.00

Solicitor's costs £50.00

Total Amount £181.02

 

Then when i recieved the Acceptance Judgement for claimant letter it said, You have made an offer of payment which the claiment has accepted. ( I thought it was the judge who accepted the Offer of payment)? Am i wrong?

 

Then it Said you must pay the claimant £111.02 for the debt and £110.02 for costs, Total £211.02 by installments of £10 per month.

 

Where did the extra £30 they added come from? Was that a fee for paying via installments or something else?

 

Again thanks to everyone who helped on this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent letter on monday via recorded delivery just waiting for it to get to logic, Then wait for a reply, i have also changed my standing order date to the 20th.

 

Thanks to Lookingforinfo and to Jannercobler for writing me the letters and for all your help. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they apply for a warrant with the county court bailiffs before you asked to pay be instalment, or did they have to make an application for something as both these use to cost £30 (well the bailiff one started at £30 but nearly all types of applications where £30). Or it may have been a fee/cost they looked to recover for sorting your instalment plan out, which by the in the first place goes to them to see if they agree or not and if they do not agree to your plan then it goes before a judge to decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also I would warn you now all the claimant has to do is instruct the county court bailiff it does not go back before the courts, this will add more charges, then all you can do is pay or dodge it or apply to the courts again and this will cost you £35 again, and you will be unable to recover this money in any event, I would send them as much information/proof as poss that you have paid and tell them you have set up a new standing order date etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they have recieved my letter saying that i have statements to prove i have payed, and i've said also in the letter that i will change the payment dates to the 20th, i've changed them at the bank and my bank said they would let them know.So is all that okay or do i need to do anything else?

 

This just seems like a [problem] by logic to get me to pay more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reply to Zoomans Question. I had a claim form from county court which i filled in asking to pay £10 per month,judge granted this and when they sent me the acceptance letter they was £30 extra added on.

 

Now logic are saying i haven't paid in accordance with the Court order even though all my £10's have been payed since july,the only thing i can think it is,is my payments being late which is a bit unfair since they was the one's who told me what date to put on the form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...