Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC Bank / Beneficial Bank PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I am new to PPI claims and would like some advise if possible.

 

I have discovered through looking back over old paperwork I have paid PPI insurance on a Beneficial Bank loan I had back in 1998 which I never agreed to. I was told I had to take out this insurance in order to get the loan. I was working FT and had no requirement for this

 

Loan was approx £1500 PPI charge was approx £395

 

I have today rang through to HFC bank 0845 6023793 who advised me that they have no record of my account and that I would need write to their complaints department proving that I have paid PPI. They have asked that I send in a copy of my agreement and also a copy of the bank statements proving I have paid the PPI.

 

Although I do have the original copies of the agreement unfortunately I do not have a copy of my bank statements going back that far. Does this mean I have no chance of claimimg this PPI. If I do still have a chance is there any advice you can give me to take this further and is their a standard letter template I could use

 

Thanks for your help

 

Regards

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If this loan was paid off more than six years ago then they may well have no record of it as they may have destroyed all of the data.

 

If it were me I would try a SAR to HFC. I may have been lucky but I got a full transaction history going back to 1989/90 from them. If they don't have any data then they should send the fee back. There is a template for SAR in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green.

 

If the loan ran it's natural course you could start your preparation for a formal claim by reading the thread linked at No.1 in my signature and use the spreadsheets at the end to work out the claim amount.

 

Also go to the fos website and download a consumer questionnaire for completion.

 

The fact that you were working full time isn't itself a reason for a mis-sale but putting the PPI onto the account without your knowledge is. Also have a read in the PPI stickies and the thread "Notes for Claimiants" as this has other useful information on mos-selling criteria.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response. My main concern is that they are happy to look at the case however they have asked me to send in the origianl or photo copy of the agreement forms which I can do. I cant however send them any bank statements they require as I dont have these. From what I understood from my call, without the bank statements there is little they ca do in terms of refund. Is this a fob off or should my agreement forms be enough.

 

I will request a SAR in the meantime

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I'd get a claim in regardless.

 

You can send them the copy of the agreement with the claim forms. At that point you would, if you wish, ask them to prove that this loan account wasn't paid and on what evidence they base that excuse.

 

One thing is for sure, if you don't put in a claim you won't get anything back.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...