Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I don't know the answer to that one. Should I do the portal thing or call Drydens?
    • Update. They increased the offer to 100 and today I heard (finally) from a senior manager. It was basically a repeat of what we were told before.  This was what we sent. Before sending a formal letter or intent to take legal action (do we do that as a business - or is that just for consumers?) I have replied as follows: Note that the replacement books we had to send to the school cost more, as well as the shipping to replace.    Dear XXXX   The contract to deliver the parcel was with DPD/ Parcel2Go.com Ltd, regardless of who you choose for any section of the delivery.    DHL confirmed the delivery with DPD when initial investigation opened after I contacted you in September 2020. The parcel shows as having been delivered August 28th at 11.30am.  Our customers reported non delivery.   DPD had the courier details and tracking number, in order to confirm the delivery when an investigation was opened by DPD in October.   We’re pleased to let you know that your parcel DPD4227962 has been located. This enquiry has been closed as your parcel has received new tracking events or has been delivered. DPD closed the case, and we were not given the courier details or local tracking number. The courier details (DHL) were not given to us until Dec 2nd, and we have never been given the local tracking number. When we contacted DHL in Dec that was the first thing they asked for; the information we had been requesting since September. DPD failed to provide the information that would have enabled us to get information from DHL, even if DPD were unwilling to assist and carry out the service with reasonable care and skill. As the contract was with DPD we would always expect to be given the local tracking number when requested. When booked through Parcel2Go.com there is a Live Chat option to request this, and we have been given this information on numerous occasions. Why did DPD not give us the local (DHL) tracking?   The compensation is irrelevant, as you are only entitled to exclude liability for negligence if the exclusion is reasonable in all circumstances, and in any case, you have not sent proof that the parcel was lost or damaged. Regardless DPD is legally obliged to carry out the service with reasonable care and skill. Protection is not to give DPD full and unlimited protection against negligence - this would be an unfair term under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.   We have had to send a new set of children's books which cost us approximately £50 more to buy, and the shipping was also more - shipping (same service) cost  £157.85 The situation created significant inconvenience in addition to substantial losses. We have been asking for the declared value of £425 plus shipping £116.80 and even with this we will have suffered a financial loss. There are no 'unforeseen' circumstances I can think of; no DPD representative would give us the local tracking number (requested over 35 times between September and December) and as a result DHL couldnt help us work out what has happened.  They may have delivered it to the wrong school with the same post code. Without the tracking they could not help us.  You have stated in your email that the parcel was not delivered, but because you haven't given the tracking details we will never know if this is the case or not. The investigation you are referring to in November was the SECOND investigation. And at no point since shipping the parcel has anyone given us the local tracking number. This should have been a straight forward request, and with this information this situation could have been avoided.  Please refund the  £425 plus shipping £116.80 as requested; by accepting this we will still suffer a loss due to your negligence, but can avoid litigation.    Elliott Hartnell-Baker    On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 11:52, DPD Local® <claims@parcel2go.com> wrote:
    • Worth a phone call or email at the least....this is not like dealing with a catalouge debt.....it's a serious threat which you can't treat like bluff.   Andy
    • Cheers Brassnecked ...going to go to town on this letter...ha 
    • used too? thats not right if it was there then the CCJ would have shown then... addresses and CCJ dont just get removed on a whim.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Palmer Biggs legal action letter over selling their clients copyrighted item on ebay)


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2722 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

hi everyone,

i have an problem and hoping to find a solution here.

 

I sold some items on ebay and the listing was removed by the company through ebay VERO.

 

i contacted the company who removed the listing and they told me i can't sell that item as they say its counterfeit.

 

I received a letter from pb legal solicitors after a few months asking for £550 legal cost and all the profit i made by selling these items.

 

I know someone already discussed a similar issue with the same solicitors in 2010/2011 but I don't know if that person paid the solicitors, ignored them or negotiated with them.

 

Please advise what steps i need to take to escape this problem.

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well..was the item countefeit ?

 

I cant see how the solicitors could have any legal right tio damages and why do they mention 'when sold' ?. Are they saying you should sell a counterfeit produect ?

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

i purchased the items from a stall and realized they are counterfeit after receiving complains from buyers and eBay removing my listing. they are asking for legal cost NOW £2,000 and asking me to pay all the profit i made from the listings on eBay. I told them that I would pay partial money for the profits i made as I returned the item the the person I purchased them from at a very low price almost going in to loss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it a case of coming to a deal with this company, at an amount that you can afford to settle at. If you fail to do this, they could report you and you could face criminal prosecution. Not worth the risk. Admit your mistake and settle at an amount that shows you NO profit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time of selling these items the ebay account was not in my name and was in a close friends name but i was partially in control of the account. I am willing to pay a small amount but they are asking for £2,000 just for legal cost for sending out 2 letters. not only this they are asking for all profits I made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you receive the letter for your friends account?

 

Where did they get your name?

 

Upon whose behalf do the solicitors state they are acting?

 

Also - unless the solicitor or someone acting with the solicitor bought the product from you, how did they get the associated account address, or determine the product was fake?

 

I suspect the £2000 is not for the two letters, but something along the lines of RLP or ACS law if you want to look them up.

 

What is the price of the genuine product, what did you pay for it, what did you sell it for, how many did you have, and how many did you sell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a look over the internet regarding this, and it seems the company gets the details of feedback posted, and your full Ebay history over the last 120 days from an internet site called Goofbay.

 

To confirm this, do searches on PB Legal/Palmer Biggs and Goofbay.

 

Might a cynic suggest that as with the ACS Law case, there was no relationship between the copyright holder and the plaintiff. As I recall ACS never won a case in court, and relied on scaring people into making payments.

 

I think I would let more of this be discussed here prior to replying again to them.

 

Well, unless of course you feel indebted to Goofbay users!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi port

 

How do you know PB Legal are acting on behalf of clients? Have you got any actual proof?

 

The way this looks is that you 'innocently' sourced stock from a 'third party', sold the 'counterfeit' stock, this legal firm feel they can demand monies from you because you unwittingly sold 'counterfeit' goods. You could contact Trading Standards and report the matter yourself, if you do, do it in writing. You could also complain to the Law Society regarding PB Legal regarding their conduct in this matter, i.e. £500 to £2000. You could report PB Legal to their clients, explain that they have been reported to the Law Society for their conduct. Their is quite a lot you can do.

 

Read :- WHO COMMITS OFFENCES? in particular the last paragraph. As you've said you've refunded monies when it was bought to your attention that the stock was 'counterfeit'.

 

Here's some info:- http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/cs/Satellite?c=Page&childpagename=Housing%2FCFPageLayout&cid=1223092622698&packedargs=website%3D4&pagename=BCC%2FCommon%2FWrapper%2FCFWrapper&rendermode=%00%27

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi bang!

i had the ebay account name changed to my name and address and i believe they got this information and contacted me later so i think they got my details from the ebay account.

the solictitors are acting on behalf of cath kidston.

 

i don't know if they purchased the product from the ebay account or someone reported to cath kidston about the lsiting so i'm not entirely sure how they got the information. or they could have been randomly checking ebay for counterfeit items.

 

I just spoke to a friend of mine today who is not a qualified solicitor but has experience in dealing with similar issues and told me not to worry and to bring the letters to him to have a look in to it. i think the solicitors are trying to scare me.

 

i had more than 100 items which include wallets and bags. I can't remember how much I sold but I did return the bags to the owner at a lower rate. I did not make much profit out of it. I think it was about £200 to £250 profit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi rebel11

the solicitor sent me copies which include snapshots of my ebay account with products being sold and feedback received from buyers. they have provided me with their clients information such as address, copyright item number etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the point you bought the goods did you realise that they were probably counterfeit ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever reaching court is massively unlikely - as the don't have the items, and their evidence is ebay feedback. They also have no entitlement to that person posting the feedback's address. I think you said you refunded the item, so even the person who thought it fake has no longer got it.

 

You just need to ensure you don't incriminate yourself - so editing anything potentially nasty here might make sense as you know their MO of obtaining "evidence" is comments written on the internet.

 

Lastly, as you said - the account was not in your name at the time, and so in theory they should be chasing someone who has nothing to do with it.

 

But replying to them with offers etc, is just massively sticking your neck out.

 

If it happened to me, I wouldn't pay. But I would not make it easy for them either - if you see what I mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Palmer Biggs legal action letter over selling their clients copyrighted item on ebay)
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...