Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st main C**k up of the Olympics


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

G4S or whatever they call themselves now cannot train enough security staff so we are going to use more of the armed forces. With the best will in the world just how long have they known the date of the Olympics? typical leave things till the last minute and get the Army to sort it out.

:-x

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 450
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Apparently the hours are very long for the wage that they are paying which is why they had had difficulty recruiting people. Secondly there is a security issue and who wants to get shot or blow up for earning just above a minimal wage. Then of course there is an accommodation problem. Thirdly you are only employed for a month and then what? Lastly not every one is capable of dealing with the general public and I doubt some how if the army can fill this gap as the men are trained for combat not PR duties. Another legacy from the Labour government that the present government have to resolve!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Serving Soldier,

 

I appreciate that you may be a bit busy at the moment, but just before I give you the sack would you mind awfully helping out at a small sporting

event we are holding in London this month.

 

You see I have just spent £475,000,000 on a private firm to do the security but they trousered the money and cannot commit.

I have managed to wangle an old warehouse for your accommodation & some rat packs for food, but you should be used to that by now.

(Gotta keep the cost down L.O.L).

 

Many thanks

 

David Cameron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't know why the government continually bites when labour comes out with some of their rubbish, I would just stand up, say 'whatever' and sit down again.

 

Shame your leaders aren't as astute as Labour then. Just watching your leaders soap opera. It is time for integrity and trust, a long time coming and I would say to all leaders, get real, work for the people.

Edited by determindator
Link to post
Share on other sites

And this morning Sky have a report from one of the trainers saying that the few people that they have managed to train are basically incompetent - one of them picked up a fake IED, waved it around for a bit and then put it through an XRay machine, and several others failed to spot concealed weapons including guns and knives. Apparently, G4 are running a "No Fail" policy so they can get as many staff as possible through training.

 

If anyone wants me during the Olympics, I'll be in my bunker, polishing my Kevlar vest.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

this fiasco is on camerons watch....money being pocketed by the upper echelon without a clue of how to run a company..condem mp's must be extremely proud...theresa may announcing on monday no problems....and having to withdraw that statement by the middle of the week...the rest of world must be curled up laughing at this bunch of clowns.. god forbid anything does happen....and this bunch of numpties are supposedly tendering to patrol the streets instead of our police forces....if the guy who appeared on bbc this morning is anything to go..I am going to try to get out as fast as I can...that's if I can be bothered to stand in line for hours on end at the airport....this is going to be an unmitigated disaster in the offing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another legacy from the Labour government that the present government have to resolve!

perhaps you would like to explain what this govt. has actually resolved....the police? the army? the NHS, the unemployed?, the sick ill and disabled...they have presided over a debt which has got larger and larger since they came to power...they have trodden all over the poorest of society, they have put another million and a half onto the dole....they have backtracked over so many policies that even I have now lost count....they have propped up the banks just last week by £350bn 'so they could lend more money out' then announce last night they are setting up a lending service so the banks can lend out money...huh?

they do not have a clue....we need a sea change in this country other than the 2 main parties who as far as i can tell are no better than each other....

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

from a serving soldier on the bbc news website

 

We are very very grateful to the military for providing this support... We are grateful that they are giving up time with family to help us.”

 

Nick Buckles

 

Get it right Nick, I didn't voluntarily give up my time to help you - I was TOLD too! We are bunked down in a school - are you going to voluntarily GIVE up your house for us to use?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The UK is a sinking nation still carried along on the momentum of its former glory, but the culture of scapegoating those who are least likely to be capable of defend themselves serves little purpose other than avoiding guilt, as without admitting the real problems, they can't be fixed without confessing the lies.

 

The UK last year blipped out of recession to have the seventh worst growth in the EU at 0,8%. Its heading for fourth worst this year. Public borrowing against GDP is also 7th worst for this year.

 

The financial sector that has largely replaced industry in the first industrialised nation on the planet is now frequently owned by the government, and from this forum and news, is riddled with underhand dealings and more bent than an eleven bob note, still continuing to print money hoping to escape from a hole.

 

The euro is currently in crisis, yet is still worth considerably more against the pound compared to the exchange rate at its inception. What does that say about the UK and sterling?

 

Will the Olympics be a fiasco?

 

Why should it be an exception?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Serving Soldier,

 

I appreciate that you may be a bit busy at the moment, but just before I give you the sack would you mind awfully helping out at a small sporting

event we are holding in London this month.

 

You see I have just spent £475,000,000 on a private firm to do the security but they trousered the money and cannot commit.

I have managed to wangle an old warehouse for your accommodation & some rat packs for food, but you should be used to that by now.

(Gotta keep the cost down L.O.L).

 

Many thanks

 

David Cameron.

 

Dear Ex Soldier,

 

As the ex Prime Minister, in whose watch the games were actually bid for, I would appreciate it if you would consider helping out your country once more.

 

I realise, that I, as a devious lying bastard, who was entirely responsible for the injuries you sustained while looking for weapons of mass destruction that I knew didn't exist, but please ignore that. It was for my glory and for mine alone, that you sustained those injuries. I realise that for you, losing a leg might have been a bit traumatic, but look on the bright side - I was able to get a lot of adulation in Washington, so I'm sure you will agree that it was worth it.

 

Yours, Tony "lying bastard" Blair.

 

Dear Ex Serving Soldier,

 

I'm sorry that the current Government is giving you the sack, that is because we spent all of the money on immigrants.

 

Yours, ex Prime Minister, Gordon Brown.

 

"There's no money left"

 

Liam Byrne

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am so glad to hear you towing the tory the line of there is 'no money' in actual fact there seems to be plenty to give to the 'fat cats'... whilst not denying that labour are a bunch of useless gits...the lies perpetuated by the right wing that most normal people seem to believe, almost leaves me speechless....but if you say it long enough, loud enough and hard enough...then eventually it must be true...£345bn given to banks for quantative easing in the last 2 months alone...g4s 300million to a company that cannot fulfill a contract..and remember that is your hard earned tax money....ah yes but the benefit scroungers are a much easier target...100's of millions of pounds to given to workfare providers...again your money..that have failed to get more than 3% of these scroungers a job...2 and half million unemployed..up a million and half since dizzy dave and his sidekicks gained power. ATOS paid millions to find people fit for work...40% of which are overturned at expensive tribunals...again using your money....financial crisis after financial crisis...more u turns than a learner driver on a lesson....labour in power 15 years...this lot 2 and have caused more damage in 2 years than in 15 years of labour...they were unelectable at the last election..and unless they can gerrymander their electoral changes through then they will be unelectable at the next election. so by all means believe the propoganda, but please start to open your eyes

Link to post
Share on other sites

brought specially for you.....the list of Govt U turns

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/may/31/coalition-u-turns-full-list

oh and the one that hasnt yet been added to list

lib dems reform of the house of lords

not enough time to debate....well seeing as they arent doing anything else...like trying to run the country..well apart from into the ground.....dodgy daves mates squeeky bum time, worrying that the gravy train may come to a halt when they have finished fu**ing us all over....remember..#THERE IS NO MONEY' did you hear that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am so glad to hear you towing the tory the line of there is 'no money' in actual fact there seems to be plenty to give to the 'fat cats'... whilst not denying that labour are a bunch of useless gits...the lies perpetuated by the right wing that most normal people seem to believe, almost leaves me speechless....but if you say it long enough, loud enough and hard enough...then eventually it must be true...£345bn given to banks for quantative easing in the last 2 months alone...g4s 300million to a company that cannot fulfill a contract..and remember that is your hard earned tax money....ah yes but the benefit scroungers are a much easier target...100's of millions of pounds to given to workfare providers...again your money..that have failed to get more than 3% of these scroungers a job...2 and half million unemployed..up a million and half since dizzy dave and his sidekicks gained power. ATOS paid millions to find people fit for work...40% of which are overturned at expensive tribunals...again using your money....financial crisis after financial crisis...more u turns than a learner driver on a lesson....labour in power 15 years...this lot 2 and have caused more damage in 2 years than in 15 years of labour...they were unelectable at the last election..and unless they can gerrymander their electoral changes through then they will be unelectable at the next election. so by all means believe the propoganda, but please start to open your eyes

 

It's difficult to read your rant because it's all one huge sentence and appears to be very incoherent.

 

I will try though.

 

I think you are trying to say that I "swallowed the Tory line" on the fact that there is no money. I was actually quoting an ex Labour Minister, Liam Byrne, who left a note for his successor to this effect.

 

As for the rest of it, well frankly it's a bit difficult to follow, but if you are saying that everybody should pay their taxes, I agree. If you are saying that the only people who should claim benefits are those who are entitled and who deserve to do so, then I agree also. If you are saying that any sponger can jump on a plane/train/ferry and start claiming benefits from you and me, then I disagree.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you believe that there is no money? andd its all been spent?

my rant is basically

 

1 big business is being handed billions of pounds of public money, and not delivering the goods.(YOUR MONEY)

 

2. g4s contract £350 million, and cannot fulfill contract (YOUR MONEY)

 

 

3. ATOS contract £300m, of which 40% of their dodgy decisions on people being found fit for work are overturned at tribunals(YOUR MONEY)

 

 

4. W2W again millions given to providers, yet they have only managed to get less than 3% of the unemployed into paid employment.(YOUR MONEY)

 

 

5. there are actually very few spongers who can jump on a plane/train/ferry and then claim benefits in this country. the rules regarding benefit claims for immigrants are very strict. although right wing propoganda would have you believe they are living the life of riley.

 

 

6. benefit entitlement for the sick, ends after 365 days unless your income is virtually zero, so if YOU were unfortunate enough to become too sick to work and say your partner had even a p/t job, after a year your entitlements to benefit would be a big fat ZERO.

 

 

7. everybody should pay taxes? the people earning top money in this country pay very little in the way of taxation, in fact, the poorest in society give a larger proportion of their income in the way of taxation

 

 

8. there is no money left, yet we can find upwards of £35bn to fund two weeks of sport, which no doubt we will be told later, is going to cost us all in higher taxes for x number of years.

 

 

9. still no money left? £345bn given to banking in the last month, in the way of QE for them to lend money out.

no wonder there is no bl**dy money dodgy dave has it given it to all his mates...

Edited by citizenB
spacing for easier reading
Link to post
Share on other sites

i was beginning to think what gorgeous geoges note will read.....how about,

sorry there is no money left we gave it all away to our mates..oh and sorry there is no police force, no army, no air force, no navy, but look on the bright side, we do have G4S protecting us all

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why weren't the government/organisers aware until now that G4S weren't in a position to provide this security? For such a huge contract, especially one involving public money, I would have expected more scrutiny to ensure that they'd be able to deliver.

 

There is also concern that there still won't be enough customs staff to deal with all those entering the country for the olympics.

 

Let's not forget that with all these shortages, the government have just announced more defence cuts, not to mention all the other public sector cuts there have already been.

 

At the moment we apparently have the resources to deal with this, but given enough cuts there won't be for future problems.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

G4S were in a position to supply the numbers, they thought they would wait until the last minute to recrute them so keeping wages down and profits up

 

A local hotel I know well was hosting an induction day for 180 G4S recruits this week. 6 turned up!!!

 

How can that have gone so badly wrong?

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-18822258

Edited by caro
add link
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would probably be an unpaid induction/training day, and those expected to attend would have been told an acceptable rate of pay initially, which would then have fallen to minimum wage, and the work a day for free part would push their disillusionment over the edge.

Edited by Bang!
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...