Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Definition of "period of absence"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4306 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Another question for you guys, obviously I made you aware that I had a capability hearing last week and the outcome was extended absence monitoring - if I was to be signed off work again under no choice of my own but that of my GP - what is the chance that even though the capability has only just been carried out - that they could setup another hearing and dismiss me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Another question for you guys, obviously I made you aware that I had a capability hearing last week and the outcome was extended absence monitoring - if I was to be signed off work again under no choice of my own but that of my GP - what is the chance that even though the capability has only just been carried out - that they could setup another hearing and dismiss me?

 

 

The thing you have to understand that employers can do anything they want, even if it is unfair and illegal (or is that unlawful can never remember) you then have the task of fighting their decisions and that means taking it to an ET. Chances are if you went sick then they would restart the whole process. However if you are saying they caused the stress in the first place that causes them a problem as I said before, in that case they may give you 'more' rope to hang yourself, so to speak, and to show that they were 'fair'. Brace yourself for a fight.

 

One tactic employers use is economic sanction ie withdrawal of pay eg 6 month full pay 6 month half pay then nothing or whatever equivilent your company have, then they spin out the time going on an on and on. Eventually the employee is forced to leave or come back. Then they have won, they rarely get rid of people where they think they have discriminated against for fear of worsening that discrimination. It is tricky all round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi papasmurf, I was signed off before they gave me an extended monitoring period - what I mean is even though it was only 2 weeks ago that they KNEW I was signed off - if I get signed off a further 2 weeks could they take me to a second capability hearing in the space of a month even though they were well aware I was off sick when they let me off last time?

 

:) thanks for your advice!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi guys

 

I had a capability hearing back in November to discuss my absence, I've had a few long term absences in the past 18 months - which were initially put down to "work related stress" - I have been off again recently (only returning today) but this time my doctor has made the decision that it can't just be work related stress and put me on antidepressants which are helping.

 

Now with the fact that the previous absences have all been work related stress (initially started after a prolonged period of conflict with a superior) and now it has been determined I have depression - what are the chances of me being covered by the DDA?

 

The outcome from my last hearing was - not to dismiss but given a final notice, which basically states that if after that final notice you have 1 period of absence - the notice is extended by 6 months - if you have a further absence in the following 6 months it lapses but if you have 2 then its a capability hearing.

 

I have only had 1 absence since the decision to give a final notice BUT at the time the final notice was given I was off sick and they raised a point that they may have to extend it straight away.

 

How does this all sound? I'm getting pretty fed up of it, every day is a constant battle without these people putting me under pressure too.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DDA has now been replaced by the Equality Act, but the provisions are substantially the same.

 

Regarding depression, if it substantially affects you on a daily basis, and has lasted or will last more than 12 months, it will be covered by the new Act.

 

Without knowing the exact details, it sounds like they are following a standard capability/absence management procedure. If you are disabled, you could argue that disability related absences should be discounted from the process, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has affected my memory, concentration and sleep for the past 12 - 18 months.

 

Yeah they are following the capability procedures but with one slight exception, I was never notified of an extension to my notice so it should be extended - if they do pull me into a hearing then I should have had it in writing that my notice was extended, that never happened.

 

Thanks for your response!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome :) I presume that they have taken you through a series of meetings and issued you with other formal warnings before moving to a final written warning? Only in exceptional circumstances is a final written warning permitted as the first stage of the capability process, and this doesn't sound like an extreme situation to me so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I had a NOC (notification of concern) then an FNOC (final notification of concern) - the procedure states that if you have only 1 absence in the 6 months following an FNOC it will be extended by 6 months, then as long as you have no more than 1 absence in the extended 6 months it will lapse.

 

As far as I'm concerned they haven't yet extended it so that should be the next step, but it's how I handle it if they decide to ignore the procedure n move straight to the hearing!

 

Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all

 

Quick background to this problem:

 

I received a letter in May this year from the Director of my department related to my sickness absence which has been quite high due to a history of stress and depression.

 

In this letter he stated:

 

"You need to be aware if you have two periods of absence in the next six months (prior to the 23rd November 2012) you will trigger a Capability Hearing which may result in the termination of your contract"

 

I'm currently on sick, and have been for 2 weeks - what started initially as Gastroenteritis has overlapped into a respiratory infection for which I have been prescribed an inhaler and given a week off (but with the option to go back sooner).

 

I have spoken to my line manager to do to explain the situation and asked him whether I was still going to be okay as it was still technically 1 period of absence, he responded by telling me he isn't sure because it's 2 illnesses whether that would be 2 periods of absence?

 

But obviously a period is defined as "A length or portion of time" so surely, because I have been off constantly this past 2 weeks it's still 1 period of absence?

 

Any advice anybody can give would be awesome - thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like one period to me. In any case what is most important is that you can show what you are doing to stay healthy - do you have a robust plan with your doctor for better mental and physical health? If it gets to a hearing that would help a lot, as well as helping you avoid one.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already conquered the mental health side of things and shown a massive improvement in the past 6 months - no longer dependent on tablets - I'm very positive and upbeat and have been working extremely hard and firing on all cylinders.

 

This current illness is all to do with what my doc described as a viral infection - I just need to clarify what 1 period of absence is so I can be sure they can't drag me through another capability hearing!

 

Thanks for your response :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They will look at your entire medical history not just this one bit. That is why it is important to have a record of what you have done on all health fronts and when.

 

Very glad you are feeling better though!

 

Have a google of the Bradford index and make sure you have a full copy of the company sick policy.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read through the company sickness policy more times than I care to mention haha, it states exactly as was put in my letter "2 periods of absence in the following six month from an FNOC will lead to a capability hearing" - they don't define what 1 period of absence is in the policy though so they could technically say if they want each illness is a period of absence - it shouldn't be as a period is an amount of time so it's technically "the period of time you have been absent".

 

I suppose only time will tell what will happen!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Final notification of concern - basically it's a letter that says you need to improve your attendance, I received the FNOC after the capability hearing I had back in November last year after the bouts of depression and stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, iyt makes no difference unless anything is a disability (lasting more than 12 months, roughly)

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thatr is my interpretation but I am not your boss!!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been a return to work between the 2 illnesses?

 

If there has = 2 periods

If there has not = 1 period

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...