Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ive been sent a notice of intent to prosecute. and im not sure what to do.

 

i was travelling from hatfield to kings cross with a std ticket and i sat in first class. The only reason I sat in first class was because the train was overcrowded and I had been waiting for the train for over an hour. I walked down to the end of the platform got on the train and sat down. I really wasn't aware that you could be prosecuted for doing so. when the ticket inspector asked to see my ticket i showed it to him and this is when he told me that i would be fined for sitting there. He asked me to pay upfront but i didn't have the money so i asked if he could send it to my house so i could pay it that way. He did caution me and ask me a list of questions which i answered but he didn't say anything about this going to court. However what i did do is give a fake name which the inspector called to check and passed. Im not sure how because that person does not exist in that house. name but my real address. This was not because i didn't have the intention of not paying but because i didn't want to get in trouble when the letter got sent to my house. Im not really sure what to do now. I didnt get on the train with the intention of sitting in first class and not paying i just stupidly sat there. I was just tired and cold and wanted to sit down.

 

any advice would be appreciated as im not sure if i should call them, write to them or to ignore this as its not addressed to me. Im a student with very little money and i accept what i did was very niave but i would really like to settle this out of court.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Starshell. This is my THIRD attempt at answering your question. But my post keeps getting removed. That really helps you doesn't it. Sorry you are being treated llike that, I don't know why.

 

Having committed three offences, which one or all of them form the basis of the charge against you? What is it exactly? The letter you received should say explicitly. Tell us what it says, removing your personal details first of course.

 

All the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

it doesn't say im afraid. it just has another piece of paper attached asking me to write down what happened and to sign it. im not sure what to do as i didnt give my real name. im not sure if i should ignore the letter as it is technically not in name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well strictly it means you've opened someone elses mail then!!! lol

I can't really condone or advise about giving false names etc; the fact that you gave the right address means it might not be impossible to trace you, especially if you are registered there. So whereas at the moment you might 'only' looking at a conviction for breaking a byelaw (by the looks of the form of words in their letter, which is almost verbatim from the byelaw), by giving a false name you have not only compounded the first offence, but committed a worse one in its own right, as providing false details is an offence under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889.

 

The choice now, I guess, is Hobson's- either own up now and throw yourself on their mercy, or wait for them to catch up with you (which may or may not happen), in which case the chances for 'mercy' will be infintismal...

 

The unfortunate thing is that without this false name business complicating things, your would have had a reasonable expectation of settling the Byelaw offence administratively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the problem. I didn't think it would as serious as court. I always buy a valid ticket and have even purchased a student rail card to help with the costs, so when i was giving a false name i didnt think. also i didnt no they called to check you live there so i was shocked they didnt realise this person wasn't real. is there no way they consider letting me settle this, im just very confused as to what to do because if i ask them to let me settle this i would have to continue being this person that doesnt exsist, but if i do that and it doesnt work i can only imagine im in further trouble.

if i do tell them what happened i know im in trouble anyway, but im not sure what kind. I can assume it will be fine and criminal conviction is there a chance of a prison sentence

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

I'm not a forum expert, but prison is not common for railway offences, so I doubt if you need to worry about that.

 

Hopefully other forum members will be along later with views about how you can tackle this. I can't advise because I don't have experience in this area, sorry, but I imagine it may be better to come clean about the false identity before the rail company start checking it all out.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Prison is a theoretical outcome under the RoRA but for a low level thing like this on a first offence, NO WAY. So don't worry about that. The problem you got is to either ignore it (and hope there's no such thing as Karma, eh! lol), or acknowledge it. But if you do, you can't come clean about just the ticket problem, now it's gotta be the false details too. All or nothing! BUT it would, I think be appreciated; Railway Prosecutors are human (!!!) and you might get some credit for owning up when if you had stayed silent, yes they might still have caught up with you, but it would have taking longer and put them to some expense, which you could save them. Get my drift?

 

Whether they offer to settle 'administratively' or not is completely their decision, but you can make it easier for them to do it with a well-phrased apologetic letter explaining unreservedlly it was a moment of panic-induced madness, promises never to do it again etc etc, and maybe even through in a chceque to cover their expenses up until now. Much easier for the prosecutor to close the case and move on if he has a cheque he can cash (the bird in hand technique).

 

I gotta shoot off for a couple of hours. TTFN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite possible that you will be identified, but before I go into that, it seems a bit hard to understand the reasoning behind this,

 

Can you explain why you had been waiting over an hour for a train from Hatfield to Kings Cross please, because there is an average of 5 trains every hour on that route.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

it was on a sunday and there were delays and i had just missed the train while buying a ticket. i just didnt want to get in trouble with my parents, i thought if it came in another name i could secretly pay it. ive never been fined before so i dont no how it works, i thought it would be obvious what they had sent me. i think i just panicked at the time because if they had thrown it away thinking it was rubbish i would of really been screwed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite possible that you will be identified, but before I go into that, it seems a bit hard to ubnderstand the reasoning behind this,

 

Can you explain why you had been waiting over an hour for a train from Hatfield to Kings Cross please, because there is an average of 5 trains every hour on that route.

 

Woooah...!!! Gotta go easy here bro; Site Team don't like us saying anything critical of an OP I'm afraid now :p lol

 

Mind you that is one of the questions I'd have liked to ask, kid gloves or not. But: I ask no questions, and get told no lies. Unlike the Inspector :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...