Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Morgan Stanley and Barclaycard PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone give me some advice please. I was with Morgan Stanley for years, it briefly changed to Egg, then bought as you all know by Barclays.

 

When it changed to Barclays they sent me a new agreement and indicated where I should sign, they had indicated by a cross against PPI and I foolishly signed. I admit I was being treated for breast cancer at the time so concentration was not there on that issue.

 

My Morgan Stanley was an online and I know I said no to PPI but it was still on there and everytime I tried to cancel it, they told me I had to contact the insurance company, which they said was on the policy, but I did not have a policy so I kept going around in circles.

 

My question is as Barclaycard sent me a new cca when they took over do I just claim for mis-selling on that, or do I still claim for MS and Barclays together even though one is signed for and one was not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

go get 'em!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays - it was at that point that PPI was added to an agreement, yes ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

one claim to barclays.[for both sections]

 

use the cisheet soc + fos cQ + complaint letter from the library sec

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone. citizenb, the ppi started with morgan stanley from the onset, I was very ill with cancer so tried to get it removed without success, when it changed to Barclaycard they indicated where to sign and unfortunately being a numpty I signed for the very thing I was trying to get out of with Morgan Stanley, the PPI !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

I have just worked out all the PPI on my Morgan Stanley, no problem there, it covers three quarters of the debt to that point. However would appreciate your thoughts on how to word my documents when claiming.

 

I had always maintained my Morgan Stanley well having had it from 2004, until I became very ill again in 2006/7. I had cancer when I took this card out, and was self employed. I attempted to make a claim on the insurance but when the papers arrived it was obvious and made clear I did not qualify to claim so I took it no further. I did try to cancel the insurance but I was just send around in circles. I then became full time carer for my partner and my income was drying up so I struggled, by the time I got to 2008 I had missed several payments.

 

In October of that same year, I was notified by Barclaycard that they had taken over the card and that they were upgrading my card to a Platinum as a much valued customer. which confused me as by then I was a bad payer. The card arrived but I was unable to use it because it was on its limit. I Managed to get £220.00 together to pay the arrears that had accrued on the MS card, then I never made another single payment or used or attempted to use the Platinum Card because it became prohibitive and way out of my reach to keep it below its limit.

The morgan stanley interest rates were 12.5% on purchases and the same on cash advances which is why I originally went for that card.

 

Barclaycard had doubled the interest to 25% on cash advance even though the only cash I drew on the card was a few years previous when it was MS, they changed the insurance company which increased the premiums, they increased the interest on purchases i.e. the old MS purchases from 12.5% to 20.5%, which pushed the card way way over the limit, then charged over limit fees, late payment fees and additional interest on all of the penalties imposed

 

For example they were charging me approx £81.00 per month for old cash advances on my MS card, plus 20.5% on the old purchases that had originally been bought at 12.5% plus £24 per month penalties, plus interest on the penalties, and continued despite me being unable to make any payments at all they also continued for months collecting the new rate of PPI and despite getting a letter telling them of my circumstances.

 

The upshot is they upgraded my card, I was never ever able to use it, they would have been aware of that, it was a vehicle only for exorbitant interest rates and charges and nothing else, they managed to add almost £2,000 extra over and above my credit limit when it was with Morgan Stanley.

 

Surely this is not legal, to me it sounds worse than a backstreet moneylender!!!!

 

Would be interested to hear peoples thoughts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you write a very simple covering letter

 

you charged me XXX ppi & xxx int on it give it back!!

 

the FOS CQ should contain everthing else.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...