Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI reclaim loans.co.uk future mortgages [citi group] - FOS taking ages


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have a complaint for mis sold ppi against a secured loan we took out in april 2004.

 

It has been in the hands of the FOS since february 2010.

 

We get regular letters from the FOS every 3 months but they all say pretty much the same thing.

 

They keep going on about looking into relationships between the ppi underwriter and the company that provided the loan

or the company that sold us the product (presumably because we used a broker to find us a loan).

 

The ppi was added to the loan at the begining and from what ive read on this forum

and other places this type of ppi is resulting in lenders practically giving customers theyre money back without any hassle.

 

This time delay is begining to fill us with doubt as to whether the complaint will be upheld.

 

Anyone got any views on this one ???

 

Need any more info please just ask thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you go for the broker?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep they run to their own timescales.

 

Have you put any pressure on them to get a resolution? If not then send them regular reminder letters.

 

May not make them move any faster but at least you know that you are trying.

 

You could also lodge a complaint with the actual Ombudsman telling them that their staff are taking an unreasonable amount of time to resolve the issue.

 

Again, it may not make any difference but it may make you feel better.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant believe your claim is since 2010.

What a load of rubbish. They are absolutley rubbish. I was going to esculate my claim from Cap One to the FOS but what a waste of time. The banks and credit cards still do what they want with us. If they ignore you when you send the Q what else can you do. When you contact these people they just igonre you anyway, total waste of time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replys.

 

In response to your question dx100uk im not 100% sure the omdusman are going after the broker.

 

We were initially approached by a claims handling company called ".........." in the summer of 2009.

 

A rep called to our house to look over our documentation, to be honest he did not seem interested in the brokers paperwork (loans.co.uk)

he was more interested in the paperwork of the lender (future mortgages) part of the citi group.

 

As far as i am aware the claim company only ever complained to future mortgages who duly told them to go away.

 

in jan 2010 we received what i assume is a standard fos complaint form filled in by ..........for us to check over.

 

We returned this to .......who submitted it to the fos in feb 2010. So im really not sure if fos are aware we used loans.co.uk as a broker ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

In light of my explanation in the above post does anyone have any thoughts ???

 

Have we possibly gone about our complaint the wrong way ???

 

Possibly to the wrong people ???

 

Could this be a reasoning behind the delay at the fos ???

 

Is there not set in stone procedures of who a mis selling complaint should be directed at e,g broker, lender or underwriter.

 

To be honest

i do understand a fair bit about ppi mis selling but it also seems that in some instances it can get fairly complicated also.

 

Looks like mine may be one of the complicated ones :

Edited by dx100uk
CMC adverts removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replys ims21 and gazette.

 

Either of you got any views on my questions in post 10 ???

 

I really am at a loss as to why my complaint is taking so long with the fos //

I know they are busy but 2.5 years busy ???

 

My ppi was added to my loan as a single premium at the begining and i thought this type of mis selling almost always resulted in an uphold ???

 

Any further info required just ask thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you chased up fos as I indicated earlier?

 

You need to put some pressure on them to give you a detailed explanation as to where the case is at this time and also ask why it is taking so long.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In light of my explanation in the above post does anyone have any thoughts ???

Have we possibly gone about our complaint the wrong way ??? - poss

Possibly to the wrong people ??? - poss

Could this be a reasoning behind the delay at the fos ??? - poss

Is there not set in stone procedures of who a mis selling complaint should be directed at e,g broker, lender or underwriter.

 

To be honest i do understand a fair bit about ppi mis selling but it also seems that in some instances it can get fairly complicated also.

Looks like mine may be one of the complicated ones :-)

 

IMHO

 

if you have NEVER sent a ppi reclaim to the MORTGAGE COMPANY

then put in a separate new claim.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post number 9 has been altered removing the name of the claim handling company we were using !!!

 

Has this been done on purpose by someone and for some particular reason ???

 

Im guessing yes and as such should not mention them by name again ???

 

Anyone confirm thanks..

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry

 

my edit note is not showing

 

better not to give them free adverts eh?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...

Hi im trying to leave a message on an old ppi thread of mine but it is locked, probably due to the length of time since it was last commented on. At the top it says to flag it up to the site team if you want to leave a comment, but im not sure how to do this. Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and which thread please...

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

merged

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

An update and some advice needed please.

 

Well the fos looked at our complaint for years,

they never actually gave any indication of whether or not they thought our ppi was mis sold. 

 

We got regular letters from them informing us they were trying to ascertain who a complaint could be lodged against and whether or not the fos had the authority to look into the complaint.

 

In January 2016 we got a final letter from them informing us they had pinpointed the relevant companies who would be responsible for a complaint however the fos could not act due to the ppi being sold to us prior to the 14th of January 2005.

So we gave up hope.

 

Out of the blue in November 2017 we received a letter from Canada square operations inviting us to put in a new type of complaint (obviously the plevin ruling).

 

I did a little research and found that Canada square are now handling ppi complaints for a number of companies one of which is future mortgages.

 

I also did a little research into the plevin ruling and mistakingly believed that we would not be able to complain via this route so I did not reply to Canada square and again gave up hope.

 

My partner persuaded me recently to put in fresh complaints with Canada square before the deadline ran out.

This I did and we have had a reply from them, 

I will put this information into my next post so as not to make this post too long.

 

Thanks Steve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the letter to one multipage PDF please 

read upload

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sorry for the delay in responding, I'm not too IT savvy when it comes to scanning the letter so i will just have to briefly explain what the letter from Canada square says.

If it's really necessary to scan the letter I will have to get someone to help me later.

 

Canada square have rejected our claim for the full ppi, they say that because no fresh evidence of misselling was supplied they have not looked at the case again and stand by their original decision.

 

Interestingly they included a copy of their original rejection letter which was sent to the CMC we were using when we first complained. This is the first time we have seen this letter.

 

They have upheld our complaint on the plevin ruling.

We have received a cheque each for  approx £2700 after the tax was deducted.

 

The amount they have paid us before interest and stat interest equates to approx 33% of the PPI premium ( ours was front loaded in a lump sum onto our secured loan ).

 

They have also said that if we bank the cheques that would be considered as us accepting their offer as full and final settlement  and we would have no recourse to complain further re this account.

We have not banked the cheques yet.

 

Questions :

1, is it worth writing back to them to ask them to look again at the full ppi complaint as we believe it was missold.

 

2, am I correct in believing a plevin complaint can only be successful if the commission was over 50%. 

 

3, am I correct in believing that if you get compensation under the plevin rule you only get back the commission over 50% and not the first 50% itself. Then obviously interest and stat interest on top.

 

4, are their threats regarding banking the cheques lawful, can we not bank the cheques and also complain further if we wanted to.

 

Thanks Steve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Not really, they've already said they wouldn't and FOS won't look at it so there's nowhere to go really.

2. Correct.

3. Correct.

4. If they are the terms of the offer then the only way you could challenge it is through the courts.

Even if you won you're back to square 1 and they could just reject the complaint.

My advice?

Take the money and run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...