Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds TSB PPI Claim Rejected ........ what now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I am after a little bit of advice after receiving a letter this morning where Lloyds TSB have rejected my PPI claim, details of the letter as follows:

 

Lloyds PPI Rejection Letter.pdf

 

Is this a standard response?

Should I do a SAR and get a copy of my application form, although it does goes back to the 90's?

Do I complain back to Lloyds or straight to the FSA?

 

Has anyone else been successful after an initial rejection?

 

My initial application was made via a leaflet through the post, but a few years ago the TSB altered their cards to have a joint Amex / Mastercard, this is where I think the PPI was added, I wouldn't have added the PPI intentionally and actually cancelled the policy 2 years ago, there won't be much to come back like some of the claims on here but it could still be a few hundred pounds.

 

Thanks for taking the time to read :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been successes where they have been challenged on their decision.

 

I would write back to them refuting each of their rejection points.

 

If they still refuse to pay out then it will be fos that you complain to, not the FSA.

 

I don't suppose you have all of the statements for your account?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for coming back so quickly.

 

I don't have any statements going back that far, I think I will do a SAR and get a better picture of where things stand.

 

I will send both letters first thing Monday morning, one for the SAR and one to challenge their rejection.

 

I will be back just as soon as I have an update.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for coming back so quickly.

 

I don't have any statements going back that far, I think I will do a SAR and get a better picture of where things stand.

 

I will send both letters first thing Monday morning, one for the SAR and one to challenge their rejection.

 

I will be back just as soon as I have an update.

 

Thanks again

 

OMG

I have received two letters this week from Lloyds

one for my loan and

one for my credit card and t

 

hey are almost word for word identical.

 

Obvious standard letters.

 

I wroteback to them straight away on the first one and had another letter today saying that due to the backlog of complaints it will take them another 8 weeks to look into it.

 

What the hell are they playing at!!

 

Just keep at them!

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG I have received two letters this week from Lloyds one for my loan and one for my credit card and they are almost word for word identical. Obvious standard letters. I wroteback to them straight away on the first one and had another letter today saying that due to the backlog of complaints it will take them another 8 weeks to look into it. What the hell are they playing at!! Just keep at them! Good luck!

 

 

Thanks for this, I thought it might be ......... let me know how you get on :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My partner has also just received an almost identical letter!

He is going to try writing to Lloyds again and then FOS if no luck.

 

It seems as though 99% of complaints against Lloyds PPI which go to the FOS prove successful for the customer.

 

(well February 2012 this was the case)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ive put 5 ppi claims in to them and received their final decision on 4 of them all identical letters.

 

i responded and received another 4 identical letters

 

one of them even had captions for the writer to put their reasons it read

 

.we cannot uphold your claim for the following reasons (operator type reasons here),

they are just blantantly just rejecting every claim.

 

as for the fifth claim

 

i got a letter today saying they have upheld my claim !!!!

 

unfortunately they dont owe me anything as i cancelled the ppi within 2 weeks !!!

 

funny that eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

I made a PPI claim with Lloyds Bank mid August last year. I received the standard letter from them dismissing my claim and sent a reply stating that I did not agree with the decision last September.

I ring them every couple of days only to be told the same thing - that the claim is been review by their team and they can not give time scales on re-opened cases.

It is nearly six months since I originally made my claim - do I need to go to the FOS before the 6 months is up?

Thanks in advance for your help.

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...