Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all, I borrowed a family member's car to attend a flat viewing. The viewing was at 17:00 on Thurs 17th June 2021(I have email to confirm this) so I was a little early as was the estate agent. I initially couldn't have been longer than 20-25 minutes before returning to the car and waiting, as the estate agent had to return to the office to obtain the correct key. I waited in the car for a approximtely 15 mins (after after the photos were taken) and then had the full viewing. The land is in a private, gated development. I received the attached PCN (Parking Charge Notice) today on Wed 23rd June 2021. It's hard to work out, but the 2 photos were taken at 16:59:08 and 16:59:40. I believe the photo was taken by someone on foot/Moped - Please help!   1 Date of the infringement Thursday 17th June 2021 [17:23]   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19th June 2021   3 Date received Wednesday 23rd June 2021   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed?  No   Have you had a response? not applicable   7 Who is the parking company? UKCPM   8. Where exactly Heritage Walk, Brentford, London, TW8 0RN   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. ISA     UKCPM PCN.pdf
    • Shall I send their witness statement to you?    I'm very flattered by what you say, I've no legal experience at all, I researched the Internet and just spoke the truth.    You've made me feel very confident, thank you!    I've sent their Witness Statement and N244
    • Hi.   You need to put your pdf docs into a multi-page file please, or people will be here forever downloading - or give up. Our upload guide will help you.   I expect people will be along to advise later.   HB
    • This is submitted by My Father with my full permission     Diary of Sweden 2019 to date Last update 23/06/2021   Document list: Letter from Transport Styrelsen 290519 Letter to Transport Styrelsen 141220 Certificate from Kronofogden sent 150520 received 130221 Essex magistrates letter 120221 Documents received 130221 in Swedish Letter from Kronofogden sent 150520 received 130221 Letter from Kronofogden 150321 Letter with new hearing date 060421 Notes on appearing in court Swedish translation   Data between inverted commas is file name   15th May 2019 I was stopped at the border having arrived from Denmark. I was several hours behind other drivers in our convoy of articulated trucks You need to add what happened to you include tests and results where you were taken how long held what they did with truck including damage when they moved it. Did they speak to you in English at all times, was their English understandable, was any paperwork translated into an English hard copy, were you given option of having English translations When were you released including taking you licence away. Did they offer any assistance? Were you offered the assistance of a legal representative and legal aid.     The only part in the English Language is “Letter from Transport Styrelsen 290519” and that was about 5 lines on the second page saying I could send a statement to not lose my driving licence rights in Sweden All other paperwork sent to Chelmsford address is in Swedish only so no idea what the charges were and I was not at any stage offered the services of a translator. The “Essex magistrates letter of 120221” point 6 says I was offered the chance of a reply. That was only true if I could speak Swedish. I have tried running all the paperwork sent to me through a translator and it makes no sense whatever.   The statement they have sent to court Documents received 130221 in Swedish are wrong, I was not given the right to reply, just said I could make a statement about retaining my right to drive in Sweden. This was the only opportunity I had to defend myself. In the “Letter from Kronofogden sent 150520 received 130221” sent with the Essex Magistrates letters was dated 15/05/2020 is that now out of date for action, also that’s in English so there is no excuse for other documentation not to be in English Kronofogden states that no letters were returned to them, this is not true as my father sent at least two of them back as Not at this address as I have moved twice since this incident In the “Certificate from Kronofogden sent 150520 received 130221” it states I was Drunk driving, that is not true as I was breathalysed and that read completely clean, I was not given results of blood and urine tests. The Certificate does not split up the fines for the two offences, only the fine and the Sum of money to the Public Fund. On the European framework list that was sent to me in document "Essex magistrates letter 120221" and also the Certificate the only offence was 34. Smuggling of goods. Drunk driving was not one of the offences to be included on the list, therefore I should not have to pay the full amount and as the amounts only show total for fines and not each offence separately I should not have to pay total amount I should only pay the fine for the offence of smuggling. As they have not itemised fines then this should be dismissed. If not please ask for time to pay after looking at my financial statement.   11th May 2021 Attended magistrates court with my father who had much of the information and understanding of the correspondence. He was stopped at the entrance and refused entry, they then ushered me in straight up to wait outside the courtroom so I could not get the information from my Father. This was stated as Covid rules; the legal people arrived and just walked through with no questions asked. One Paralegal (who happened to be black) was stopped and refused entry even though she arrived with her client, there was a huge argument and the Court manager was requested by the paralegal. This is not the way to give justice to people. In the “Certificate from Kronofogden sent 150520 received 130221” it states I was Drunk driving, that is not true as I was breathalysed and that read completely clean, I was not given results of blood and urine tests. The Certificate does not split up the fines for the two offences, only the fine and the Sum of money to the Public Fund. On the European framework list that was sent to me in document "Essex magistrates letter 120221" and also the Certificate the only offence was 34. Smuggling of goods. Drunk driving was not one of the offences to be included on the list, therefore I should not have to pay the full amount and as the amounts only show total for fines and not each offence separately I should not have to pay total amount I should only pay the fine for the offence of smuggling. As they have not itemised fines then this should be dismissed. The Magistrate stated that they were not concerned with original case where the fine was given only this one, so judgement was given against me. They said the judgement would be sent to me   To present: I have up to present not received a copy of the judgement I have had three copies of further action sent to me, one at my old address and when I informed them again (as I did in court} they sent another two copies of the further action letter to me.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

MKDP LLP ( Trade Pro ) fuel card Debt ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have ( unfortuneately ) a Trade Pro account.

I have had this account for approx. 4 years.

The total owed is approx. £1700.

I have missed a few payments in the past and this is probably the reason why it is so high but have been keeping up the payments recently.

 

Yesterday I received a letter from Trade Pro ( on headed paper) saying that my debt had been sold to MKDP LLP and that all details have been transfered to them.

 

MKDP LLP has appointed Compello Operations Ltd. as their servicing agent to manage the account on their behalf.

With effect of the date of the receipt of this notice all payments should be made to MKDP LLP.

 

Compello Operations Ltd. will contact you to arrange payment of the balance.

 

Are Trade Pro allowed to do this ?

Should I get in touch with Trade Pro instead ?

 

These payments are really crippling me at the moment ( self employed, doesn't need explaining really !! )

and this millstone around my neck is something I really could do without .

I must have paid this debt off five times over by now and it isn't going down !!

 

Anybody got any advice please

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they can sell the debt at anytime.

Are you getting yearly statements on

the account?

I think it would be wise to check your Credit

reference files to see what balance shows there.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you requested a full breadown of how the debt is made up (there may be some excessive charges) ? Trade Pro have probably sold the debt on for a fraction of what it originally was. You should try and set up a payment plan with them if possible of whatever you can afford...but check to see exactly how the debt is made up.

PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.

 

DEBT COLLECTION LETTER/SAR/AGREEMENT TEMPLATES ARE HERE - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?65-legislation

 

IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU

 

I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU

 

IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.

Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.

If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.

 

Forum rules - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you requested a full breadown of how the debt is made up (there may be some excessive charges) ? Trade Pro have probably sold the debt on for a fraction of what it originally was. You should try and set up a payment plan with them if possible of whatever you can afford...but check to see exactly how the debt is made up.

 

When you say requested a full breakdown of the debt, do I get that from Trade Pro or now MKDP LLP ?

Do I set up a payment plan with Trade Pro or MKDP LLP ?

And finally, if there are excessive charges, can I get those back and who from ?

 

Thanks in anticipation

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO i would SAR trade pro

 

i bet, as guessed already 42man

the debt is most prob inflaetd with unlawful PENALTY hagres like over/late etc etc

 

all of those can be reclaimed.

 

i wouldn't worry too much about MKDP & Compello Operations Ltd

they are really very low bottom feeders in the DCA world.

 

just dont forget

no dca actually h ANY legal powers

so dont fall fo their threats.

 

its obv that the account is a lemon

thats why trade pro have sold it

 

if they cant goto court with it

neither can any DCA!

 

IMHO i would drop your payment to say £5PCM

whilst you get that SAR info back.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

MKDP LLP has appointed Compello Operations Ltd. as their servicing agent to manage the account on their behalf.

With effect of the date of the receipt of this notice all payments should be made to MKDP LLP.

 

Compello Operations Ltd. will contact you to arrange payment of the balance.

 

Are Trade Pro allowed to do this ?

Should I get in touch with Trade Pro instead ?

 

Hi

 

You said you were keeping up payments recently, so I presume you have not been served a Default Notice?

 

There will probably be a clause which states they can transfer the rights of the debt to someone else, however the new owner must abide by the original contract.

 

So if you have not been served a DN, MKDP LLP should not be asking for the full balance, just regular monthly payments, which you are already paying.They should only ask for the full balance if they have served a compliant D (Section 87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 I think???)

 

There may also be a clause which states they can call in the full balance at anytime, but this is virtually never used and they would need a very good reason resort to this clause and enforce it should you say you cannot pay the balance in full.

 

Hope that helps and I think its all pretty accurate haha

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I have ever been served a default notice, Trade Pro have threatened to serve but I'm fairly certain they never actually served it. As I say ,I have been paying regularly for a least the last 6 months

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

So am I right in saying that I apply with a £10.00 cheque to Trade Pro for an SAR . Apply for all the charges back but in the meantime tell MKDP LLP that I will not communicate over the phone and only by letter and then offer £ 5.00 pcm .

 

Have I got this right ?

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically yes!

Does this show on your credit files, if so

the entry will confirm if the account has

been defaulted.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

most prob statute barred

or

you had a default entered more thAN 6yrs ago

and its fallen off..

 

a change of tac might be useful here

 

get that SAR off to trade pro

and

i'd send a CCA request to MKDP LLP

 

if one or other or both

fail to comply, that would confirm SB status

 

who have you bee paying the PCM too? trade pro ?

 

there are ofcourse times when accounts dont show

 

it might be an idea to get another CRA file from a diff lot

 

who have you used so far

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri experian.

 

ok get your noddle report

thats free.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, get another CRA check done Equifax. Experian or Call Credit (Noddle free but no always up to date imo.)

 

SAR template in CAG Library, there is a£10 statutory fee and they have 40 days to

repy, address the SAR to the Data Controller.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
most prob statute barred

or

you had a default entered more thAN 6yrs ago

and its fallen off..

 

a change of tac might be useful here

 

get that SAR off to trade pro

and

i'd send a CCA request to MKDP LLP

 

if one or other or both

fail to comply, that would confirm SB status

 

who have you bee paying the PCM too? trade pro ?

 

there are ofcourse times when accounts dont show

 

it might be an idea to get another CRA file from a diff lot

 

who have you used so far

 

dx

 

Whats a CCA ? I have been paying to Trade Pro for some years and I am fairly certain I dont have a dafult notice with them, I have been threatened with one but don't think I got one !!

 

I have missed some payments in the past .

 

MKDP LLP have only raised their ugly head in the last week untill then I have dealt only with Trade Pro

 

I have used only Experian to check my credit status

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Consumer Credit Agreement Regulated Under the the

Consumer Credit Act 1974, you are making a lawful request

for the production of a true copy of your agreement.

Use the template from the CAG library, there is a £1 statutory

fee (use a postal order) the DCA has 12+2 working days to

comply.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

has anybody not picked up that trade pro and mkdp are the same comapny

 

They also go under the names as follows: MKDP,Raven Recoveries

 

red debt collection/hampton legal and lowells for example

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

MKDP LLP are specificall a Debt Purchase Company as with most

other DPCs the have their own Debt Collection Arm.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
A Consumer Credit Agreement Regulated Under the the

Consumer Credit Act 1974, you are making a lawful request

for the production of a true copy of your agreement.

Use the template from the CAG library, there is a £1 statutory

fee (use a postal order) the DCA has 12+2 working days to

comply.

 

So I send £1.00 postal order to MKDP LLP for a CCA and also a £10.00 postal order to Trade Pro for a SAR and also refuse to speak to MKDP LLA on the phone and only by mail.

 

I'll send off for these this week if it's correct ?

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you have an actual account with trade pro to begin with or another company

as i remember trade pro did fuel cards

it will effect who you send the sar to

Link to post
Share on other sites
did you have an actual account with trade pro to begin with or another company

as i remember trade pro did fuel cards

it will effect who you send the sar to

 

The original account was with Trade Pro as a fuel card .

 

I have just checked my credit report with Noddle and it has been defaulted , why I dont know but apparently it has been in default for at least since January according to Noddle

Link to post
Share on other sites

send the sar to trade pro then and the cca request to mkdp

 

you stated you have had this account for a number of years, did trade pro previous default this account by serving a default notice under 87 (1) of the cca 1974 prior to mkdp

Link to post
Share on other sites
send the sar to trade pro then and the cca request to mkdp

 

you stated you have had this account for a number of years, did trade pro previous default this account by serving a default notice under 87 (1) of the cca 1974 prior to mkdp

 

I don't remember ever recieving a default notice of trade pro, I have been threatened , but I don't remember ever being served with a default notice. According to my credit report , I have been in default since at least January even though I have rang them every month to make my payment !!

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

does your credit file under status show account defaulted or just that you have missed payments

 

it is important that we find out when and if this account was assigned to mkdp and was the account live when it was assigned

 

have you ever received an assignment notice from mkdp saying they now own the account or are mkdp just collecting on behalf of trade pro

 

what also was the assignment, absolute or equitable

 

the problem we have is mk and trade pro are the same comapay and the lack of a default notice indicates the account was live when sold so mk can now default in january

Link to post
Share on other sites

My account status says I am in 'default ' and I have been in ' default ' since December . I have been paying my monthly payments , on time,every month. I recieved a letter this week , on trade pro headed paper , saying that my account had been sold to MKDP LLP and they will be in touch shortly to discuss my account and MKDP LLP has appointed Compello Operations ltd as their servicing agent.

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...