Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Jazzer vs Capital One (PPI)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4245 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm in the middle of a dispute with Capital One over the calculation of contractual interest on PPI charges.

 

I have calculated the contractual interest in the same way I calculated it for credit card charges previously, in that I took their interest rate and applied it in a compound fashion from the date of the charge on my account until todays date. I used the spreadsheet to caculate the interest.

 

Just want to check that I've done this correctly.

 

Kind regards,

 

Jazzer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allocation questionnaires have been done, total value £1560, including court fees.

 

They are trying to fob me off £280

 

 

 

Ah well you are OK then

 

Interest in restitution and all that.

 

What stage are you at and what is the value of your claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Capital One aren't budging, and I now have a court date. Before I submit the £325 hearing fee is there anyone who could advise me that I've done my spreadsheet properly as Cap One are still bleating that I'm not calculating the interest properly, though I'm sure I am. Also some idea of what I should bundling for court would be helpful.

 

Jazzer

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter what Cap1 think about the interest, it is the Judge who will decide.

 

If you are claiming interest in restitution then that is the case you will put to the court.

 

I'll flag this for the site team legal folks to look in for you on the legal specifics for you.

 

ims :-)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your claim involves charges older than 6 years, you will need to include in your court bundle reference to the case of Kleinwort Benson v Lincoln City Council. http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKHL/1998/38.html&query=title+(+kleinwort+)+and+title+(+benson+)+and+title+(+v+)+and+title+(+lincoln+)+and+title+(+city+)+and+title+(+council+)&method=boolean

 

You'll also need to refer to the case of Sempra Metals v Inland Revenue Commissioners, to support your claim for restitutionary interest. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/389.html

 

An internet search on each case will also lead you to brief summaries made by lawyers and/or barristers which refer to the salient points of each ruling.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Slick,

 

Nice to see you again.

 

Can anyone give me an idea of what should go in my bundle? I think I know what to do with the bits Slick mentions, but just a list would be useful.

 

Just to further clarify Capital One are trying to deny the misselling as well as the refusal over interest calculations.

 

Interestingly got an email from the trainee solicitor at CapOne that has been dealing with me asking for an extension for the witness statements to be in. They seem to want extensions for everything do CapOne!

 

Any help very much appreciated.

 

Jazzer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so regarding interest I get charged a ppi fee on my account in 2002, then i stick that into my spreadsheet in 2012 and it calculated the compound interest at capital ones rate over the ten years and then adds 8% simple interest on because this is a court claim now.

 

CapOne are trying to say the FSA calculator says different, however I think this is irrelevant as its a court claim.

 

Could someone tell me if I'm wrong before I hassle capital one.

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

After fobbing me off for 1 year Cap one have capitulated and admitted that they owe me it and they are paying pretty much to the penny that the various spreadsheets on here calculated. Their letter crossed in post with mine saying I had enough and want sar and my costs though but they have admitted in open correspondence they were wrong and that I could never have claimed on it under the terms of policy, and also my umpteen letters were ignored. The power of sar - made them look at it all again I suppose. Getting back only about £500 but only had card for 2 1/2 years. Paid full 8% from closure of account to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

URGENT

 

Had a conversation with Capital One this afternoon. They claim that they only need to pay interest in restitution whilst my account was open (account was closed in 2008) and then 8% statutory from then on. I have to file the hearing fee tomorrow so I need to know definitively if I am right in claiming 27.9 % from the day the ppi charge was levied and 8% simple on top.

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would claim restitutionary interest from the date of the charge to the date they refund it, regardless of when the a/c was closed.

 

As regards claiming 8% on top, if that's what is recommended in PPI cases, go with it.

 

When dealing with Credit Card Penalty Charges, I recommend either Compound Restitutionary Int't or 8% Simple Int't but not both. But PPI is treated differently and I'm not the best to comment on this.

 

What I can say is that the amount you claim can be negotiated between the parties before, and to avoid, the final court hearing. So you can negotiate and accept any offer you find acceptable - you don't HAVE to stick to the exact amount on the court claim.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noted, but remember you are the Claimant in the matter. Accordingly, you have to prove to a judge that your claim is valid.

 

Negotiating may be a very good way to settle this and avoid the court hearing completely.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...