Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lombard Direct Personal Loan Insurance/RBS Loanguard - reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

Just checking in with an update. Things are ticking along nicely behind the scenes with lots of great advice on the best way to approach RBS when SAR's are returned. My plan for tomorrow, is to chase up everything that was sent out last week and make a general nuisance of myself. Thank you all once again for all your help and support. Will update tomorrow evening.

 

Cheers

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lovely people,

 

Recent developments on the Lombard Direct (RBS) loan.

 

This is the policy I tried to claim on at the same time as my overdraft insurance

and was told by Lombard at the time that I didn't have insurance to cover me for sickness.

 

I had sent off a copy of the settlement letter that I found by chance (but never used) from Lombard in 2007.

 

I got a response today from RBS PPI Customer Concerns saying how sorry they are that I'm unhappy (just a tad).

...also asking if I am subject to any fiduciary arrangements.

 

Not knowing if that meant the unlawful CCJ they have against me,

I called.

 

Was told they didn't know but to call Lombard Direct. Lombard Direct said they didn't know,

but as the letter came from RBS PPI Customer Concern Team, to call them (same old hamster wheel)

 

While on to Lombard Direct,

I asked the girl to check if there was a policy attached to that loan number...

..she gave me the policy number.

 

I explained that I had tried to claim when I was sick, but told I didn't have insurance to cover me.

It seems I had sent them a claim form (can't even remember doing this....all I recall is being told on the phone that I didn't have cover)

she had all of my hospital report, which she read through, but then said she didn't understand..

...all notes ect. were for sickness, but the actual refusal was for unemployment.

 

I explained that I had been on a contract abroad, with a UK company, but had to come home because I was sick.

 

She then explained that the reason my insurance would have been void was because I was working on contract.

I explained that I was never claiming for unemployment, but for sickness and had I not been sick, I would have still been working.

 

According to her, it's all the same......couldn't have used the policy for sickness.

I've asked her to send me Terms and Conditions.

 

I called FOS to ask what they thought and he recons what she is talking about is 'at point of sale'

and if I was in full time employment in the UK at the time I took out the loan (I was) the policy was valid.

 

Any ideas???

 

Thanks G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerri

 

I'd like to say I'm shocked or slightly surprised but...... they are a pretty disgusting and shambolic outfit. The Fos are referring to status at commencement of policy, in simple terms you shouldn't be disadvantaged by a future event outside of your control.

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

time to get reclaiming then?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that guys,

 

I was beginning to think that the RBS were going to worm their way out of the whole Overdraft Loanguard Insurance debacle.

 

I'm thinking...

..do you think it may be best to hang fire till I also have confirmation that the Overdraft Loanguard Policy would have paid out..

...if they hadn't denied it's existence, and go after them for mishandling both policys' in court....

...which is where I may end up if they don't agree to clean up my credit report. G

 

p.s. my brain hurts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would be sensible to hold fire until you have all data. However; personal experience tells me you won't receive everything you should expect.

 

Keep tabs on the 40 days compliance period, when they fail to comply with the SAR [and they will fail] you'll need to press them again.

 

There's a couple of ways to approach some form of restitution when the time comes but you'll find you're in a far stronger position if you exhaust all avenues [possibly to incl the I.C.O and F.o.S] prior to seeking the courts intervention.

 

There's no simple or quick fix to this so you really should prepare yourself for the long game

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes...I think the best course of action is to wait until I have all the info.

 

I know I'm going to have a battle on my hands trying to get them to untangle the mess, so I'll need to try and make some sense of it myself.

 

Thanks Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicola Sturgeon.....she's MSP. Do you think it would be worth getting in touch with her? She has a really solid law/money advice background.....this may just hit the right note with her, I've been thinking about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that may be a plan.....I was thinking that the problem wasn't quite serious enough to go to her with, but I s'pose, looking at the big picture, there might just be lot's of people out there who have been more damaged than I have by whatever this stupid mistake is that the RBS are making......I surely can't be the only one it's happened to in recent years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gerri

 

To be honest, it was never a mistake by the bank....... they made a commercial decision to deny you relief to the product you'd faithfully paid for over a number of years, in your greatest time of need.

 

This will interest her far more than you may imagine.

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Gerri

 

Some more contact details for your list:

 

From: Taylor, Aileen (Group Secretary) [email protected]

Aileen Taylor 07748******

 

Currently on maternity leave, returns November

 

In her absence; Contacts are Jan Cargill on all Board and Corporate Governance matters, and Gary Stewart on all RBS Secretariat matters:

 

Jan Cargill - 0131 626 3860 ([email protected])

Gary Stewart - 0131 626 3957 ([email protected])

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...