Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I'd change justice centre to county court. I also wouldn't be including a telegraph article in the bundle. It doens't prove anything law and you don't have distribution rights on it. I also wouldn't personally break down the exhibits on the index page, normally people have a seperate page for this right before the exhibits. The main index page normally just says Exhibits to WX of [Your Name] or at least that's the format I use/see people here use, although really it makes minimal difference.   I also see that despite referencing several judgements you haven't included the EVRi one   paragraph 46 really needs to go imo it has nothing to do with anything. Your in court to apply the law to your case, not to tell the judge about a newspaper that means nothing to your claim.   I also see you've adopted the issues in dispute/not in dispute, which is also known as a scott schedule. if you are taking this approach, for things not in dispute I would say this needs to be things that are agreed between parties, not things like "There is no dispute that I am happy to supply all this evidence which is included in the court bundle." I would say that issues in dispute is to focus on the aspects of the claim that are in dispute, such as whether liability is limited by insurance or not, so I'd be changing that accordingly.   BF should be along shortly to advise on things.
    • J, I just numbered them like that; once the witness statement is made, I'll add it to the pages.   The court date has been set as 02 July 2024. Please find attached V6. I will send an unredacted to the email.  claim budle_V6.pdf
    • I'm afraid that I have tried downloading it three times and each time I am getting an error message. Would you mind scanning it again please and uploading it again. I understand that JK has managed to open it but others may not. Thanks
    • I can see that.   In this case, I'd email both that receipt and your tracking label to evri's small claims email and say that is the information you have.   They'll figure it out from there I'm sure
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money - 2 mortgages with PPI reClaims - everyone bar GE sold it me!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3834 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

as post 41

if the PPI policy WAS a separate agreement

and a separate DD

then GE money [iGroup] are the target.

ref post 51

sent them the PPI form mentioned in post 54

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have sent them copies of the form

and still they keep coming back with the same letter

i miust have 6 copies now of the same thing.

 

They just don't answer my points.

 

I sent again yesterday requesting a copy of the policy etc.

 

The single payment was added to the remortgage which was paid off and no refund given.

 

The other one is an interest only mortgage and is still being paid.

 

Both have now finished as were only valid for 5 years anyway.

 

So Frustrated :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Dx not being one to give in .

 

I have this morning written yet another letter for each claim and drawn their attention to the Easy Loans form with no ticks in boxes

and copies the ppi application form and the underwriting sheet showing payment made to Igroup financial services for PPI a

nd also the agreement form lets see what this brings !!!!

 

All My letters are nbeing faxed and posted so no way can say not received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well took advice spoke to FOS

the only way they can help is if I can get the insurers name which is a nightmare

I have requested copies of both policies on 3 occassions now and still no luck.

 

I do know that one is under the name of Cigna

but I need the complete name to be able to move forward as I group did not come under their juristiction in 2002

when the ppi was taken out.

 

Any ideas now !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..

 

thats useful WA

 

i wonder if it might not be an idea anney to fire the claims at them

 

see what happens.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may do yet

I need copies of the policies which I am having a nightmare getting hold of from GE.

Once I can start down that route.

 

The FOS advised me they may be able to help if they wont play ball.

 

Its really annoying that money has been paid to IGroup Financial Services and yet no policy etc has ever been received.

 

The only way I know CIGNA are involved on 1 of the claims is that they were mentioned in a phone call and their name was on the top of 1 letter.

 

I may even go the CEO route if I get nowhere after my last letter.

 

I feel that the resolution staff just send the same letter and don't even answer my queries or read them.

 

Not giving up easily!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Has anyone the address of Duncan Berry CEO of GE . I have an email addres for Mark Elborne who is the CEO of GE Uk Ireland so may go to him. Just cannot get information on these policies. I know that one was with Cigna International but not a clue who the other was with. Surely they should have record of the Policies !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I have sent a fax this morning and sent recorded delivery.

 

This may be my next course of action but how I go about it I haven't a clue.

 

It still bothers me that payments was made to Igroup financial services.

 

The only mention of Cigna has been in a phone call and at the top of 1 letter.

 

I am not even sure if the second policy was with Cigna.

We shall see.

 

I have requested copies of the policy and terms & Conditions.

 

GE just will not furnish me with copies or policy numbers .

 

I sent my last letter Private and Confidential to David Gurney Customer Experience Director at GE Money Home Lending.

 

Whether it will help who knows.

 

Getting really frustrated with it all.

 

Need all the help I can get :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS are advising Insurers route but they have a number of Cigna companies and need the correct one. I am beginning to think a claims company is the best option. Still believe that GE are liable as the PPi form was in the name of Igroup and section 56 of the consumer credit act covers this. So Frustrated with it all !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

a claims company has no more powers than you do.

 

and will take +30% of anything you get.

 

dont !!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Day off work today so have been looking at all avenues.

 

Even checked meaning of inetermediatory and look what I found

 

1. (Law) a person who acts as a mediator or agent between parties.

 

GE are adamant that Easy loans was not acting as their agent and the word Intermediatory is the actual wording re Igroup on their web site.

 

"The IGroup brand does not sell products directly to customers. Our products are offered through a nationwide network of intermediaries."

 

Every tiny piece of info will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do understand DX but getting to the stage that my friend would be better getting something rather than nothing.

Its quite a big claim.

 

GE are just not playing ball and sending the same old letter every time.

 

FOS Not able to help as pre 2005 and both unregulated agreements.

 

My Friend does not have cash to go legal.

 

So What next. ??

 

I have this morning sent an e mail to David Gurney at GE running out of ideas !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

GE can be a very hard nut to crack, but they do give in.

 

in this instance, i think you've got them

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much DX you're always there to help. I think I may send everything to this David Gurney who is the Customer Experiences Director . Lets see if he answers my mail first. I am happy to start from scratch with him. Or if there is any other avenue you can advise I would be grateful .:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes good idea

 

in your email you attach things too

 

simple put the bit about IGroup being GE money

 

let him comment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 Letters received today Both the same just different numbers. Going round in circles I think. The mails were sent for attention of the Director let see what this brings it seems they are back in the same department so don't hold out a lot of hope

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter recived from Cigna with print outs they have forwarded to GE. If GE had policies why have they never been received and why were they not forwarded with SAR. What do I do now any suggestions or should I just wait for GE's next letter of rejection :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

that first one is pretty damning that GE money ARE responsible.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...