Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Us Vs MBNA PPI reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

MBNA have sent a letter stating that PPI was added to the account at my husbands request, "At the time PPI was added to your a/c, you were eligble fro the cover (you stated on your app. form that you were a UK resident, in permanent employment and aged between 18 and 17). When you opted for PPI we did not offer advice about the policy, we provided you with info. only. In other words, yours was a non-advised sale. Having reviewed the info. you have provided, our processes and the disclosures which we made t oyou at the time, we are satisfied that you had sufficient info. to make your own evaluation of and decision about the product on offer. On this basis, I regret to advise that I am unable to uphold your complaint or issue a refund of the premiums paid."

 

Then it goes on to tell us to go to the ombudsmen if we are not happy, which clearly we are not!

 

Is there any point in pursuing this?

 

He (husband) had no idea what he was signing up for, cant remember doing it and had no idea that he even had it, I suppose it was done blindly, if indeed he did sign up for it as they say. He has never claimed on it, and has had this card for at least the last 12 yrs. (longer than he has been with me for!) so, what now?

 

Any advise, opinions etc welcomed, thank you very much :-)

 

H

I am not a legal expert, any advice I give is based purley on experience or opinion.

Please tip the scales if you feel I have helped you!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

How was the application for the card done?

 

What reasons did you give in the fos questionnaire for the mis-sale?

 

Have you got a copy of the agreement showing that you selected the option for PPI?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same letter from MBNA i took it FOS and then MBNA settled before it went to the adjudicator. i got a seriously lg amount of dosh as my card went back to 1996, I would lodge a complaint with FOS and in meanwhile SAR MBNA so u can get an idea of whats owed, The guys on here are fab at guiding thru it and for the time it takes to do a few letters it should be well worth it

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21

 

Thanks for your reply, basically he can't remember how he originally applied for the card it was that long ago, he doesn't have a copy of the agreement and there was no FOS or SAR or anything sent so no reason was given for the mis-selling of PPI. He rang them up and asked if there is PPI on his account, and this is the response we got :S

 

What do you think? any chance of pursuing it?

 

Thanks again

 

Heidi

I am not a legal expert, any advice I give is based purley on experience or opinion.

Please tip the scales if you feel I have helped you!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI Rani thank you for your reply, thats very encouraging news, well done you :)

I am not a legal expert, any advice I give is based purley on experience or opinion.

Please tip the scales if you feel I have helped you!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops just seen the typo in the letter, *aged between 18 and 70* hahaha, 18 and 17, he wishes :p haha

I am not a legal expert, any advice I give is based purley on experience or opinion.

Please tip the scales if you feel I have helped you!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a fob off to me. All he has done is asked whether he had PPI and they have written back and said he can't claim it back. That is without any formal claim having been lodged.

 

If it were me I would SAR MBNA to get as much detailon the account as possible. Template for SAR is in the CAG library. Cost is £10 and they will have 40 days to comply. From the data that comes back, as Rani says, it should be possible to work out how much you are due back.

 

In the meantime, pop along to the fos website and download a copy of the consumer questionnaire ready for completion.

 

You will end up sending a completed fos questionnaire to the lender together with a copy of the spreadsheet and a brief covering letter requiring refund.

 

If you have a look in the PPI stickies you will find one with "Notes for Claimants"...have a read of it a it will give you some useful information on mis-selling reasons

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are a STAR, thank you so much :)

 

I'll get onto it now while I still have ink left in the printer :p

 

Heidi x

I am not a legal expert, any advice I give is based purley on experience or opinion.

Please tip the scales if you feel I have helped you!! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...