Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

EGG PPI and me - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am trying to decide whether to try to reclaim PPI from Egg as I have had a credit card with them for years

(now closed and moved to Barclayslink3.gif, but still paying monthly)

and several loans, including 2 top ups (one of which is still current, although no longer have ppi on it).

 

I cancelled all my PPI products on mortgage, loans, credit cards (with Barclays and Lloydslink3.gif as well as Egg) in 2007

and have some paperwork relating to some of it.

 

However I'm pretty sure I took out at least some loans and my credit card with Egg over the internet.

 

The card and initial loan applications were pre 2007 and I seem to remember some instances of the ppi option box being pre-ticked,

so thought that to untick would reduce my chances of getting credit.

 

I also had absolutely no idea that you could get PPI insurance elsewhere,

until a chance conversation with a friend in 2007.

 

I researched it and then wrote to all lenders (have copies of those letters) cancelling and then took out mortgage ppi and income ptotection instead.

This was much cheaper.

 

What is an SOC and what did you give as reasons for mis-selling?

I think mine would be that they did not make me aware that other products were available (but were they obliged to online?)

and that the pre-ticked box made me think that PPI was preferred/essential to get the card and /or loan.

 

Also at that time I thought that the only alternative to an 'optional' PPI was not to have protection at all

(as I know now, I probably would not have benefited from expensive PPI as my work sickness policy would have paid out for 6 months full pay and four months half pay,

but I do know that online sales are classed as 'unadvised' so they didnt need to check my circumstances).

 

I am trying to get my head around it all before sending anything off to the lenders.

 

I am going to request info from egg and Barclaycard re how the loans,cards etc were taken out as I am not sure whether some phone sales of PPI

were involved along the way.

 

Any info gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread started here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

first port of call is all the satatements for credit cads

 

and

a copy of each loan agreement

 

esp if they were refinanced.

 

SAR to EGG me thinks.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...