Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Three UK Price Increases


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4272 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I received an email from Three last night telling me that they are increasing my monthly price by 3.6% in accordance with inflation. I wasn't happy with Three at the best of times however, they said in the email that as this price increase goes hand in hand with inflation then no one can cancel their contract as it says in their terms and conditions. When I took the contract out, I was of the understanding that it was £30 a month however, it turns out that that's excluding VAT so I actually pay £35 but that was not ever mentioned to me nor does it make that clear when purchasing the phone. I've also had numerous problems with signal and internet connection. I am desperate to get out of this contract. I have another year left in July. Can anyone advise me as to what I can do? I have thought about just cancelling the direct debit however, I am aware that that would have an adverse affect on my credit rating but I can't think of any other way. Help would be appreciated.

 

Ross

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personal thought, you should write them recorded delivery and email them and cancel, not ask to cancel, but cancel. Cancel your direct debit and then make sure there is no outstanding bill. The final bill I would pay with a cheque so you have a written record of payment.

 

You can sight the 'Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts' as the reason for doing this, and I'm betting you will get some demands for the remainder of the time but no summons as they know they have gone against the regulation in that you had no say in the writing up of this contract and other things.

 

I don't know what your CRA record is like, but if they put anything on there, then you can issue a summons to get it removed if they refuse to after your threaten them.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Coniff,

 

They have said previously that I would have to pay the amount that is left to run on the contract which would be more than £300 and I think that is unreasonable. So, by paying my last bill by cheque then you don't think they will make me pay back the remainder of my bill?

To my knowledge, my credit rating should be pretty good as I haven't ever defaulted on a payment and so the only thing that worries me is that they make it bad however, they would issue me a summons if I threatened them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't pay them anything v_b. Contracts work 2 ways and that is why these consumer contract regulations were brought in. You saw and read a contract that said x. They accepted you on that x contract but now you are signed up, they decide to change the contract to xx and with no get out clause, they can dream on.

 

You will get default notice put on your file, but I could never see them have the guts to take this to court and try and get you to pay. They will just sell it on to some gutter company who will send you letters demanding double what they claim is owed. You just need the determination to carry it through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi V_b, I received a similar email fro Three as well and I responded by email too and told them that I am not prepared to accept that increase as what I singed

for is different from what they are asking now. I told them that unless they are going to maintain the original price plan, they should cancel the contract.

I haven't heard anything from them. But I think what they are doing is unfair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This stands out like a sore thumb and is I believe what the UTCCR is all about and make this contract unlawful:

 

"12.1

If you wish to make any variations to this agreement or rely on any other term, you must obtain our agreement to the variation on term in writing."

 

The same goes the other way around, so take no nonsense from them or their one sided contract.

 

Within one month of a materially detrimental variation to your agreement. (A cancellation fee will not be charged)"

 

I can't see anything about inflation not allowing cancellation.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth the £2 to do that, I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them.

 

I will do that just to find out what is going on. At the moment I am away but will check on my return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff,

 

Here is the part in the Three terms and conditions which states that we are unable to cancel without a cancellation charge. They are saying they are increasing their prices due to inflation and to cover their business costs. Even with what they have put in the terms and conditions, would myself as a customer be able to cancel without a charge by citing the UTCCR rules and regulations? The thing I'm most worried about as I've said is being blacklisted as I think that I may require a loan in the coming years for a house and a car. I'm planning on doing what you said and writing to them to tell them that I will be cancelling the direct debit from the date that the price increase occurs.

 

4. Variations to your agreement or prices

4.1 We may vary any of the terms of your agreement,

including our Packages, on the following basis:

(a) any updated Packages and new terms will be

available on our website and on request to Three

Customer Services;

(b) we will let you know at least one month in advance

if we decide to:

(i) discontinue your Package; or

 

(ii) make any variations to your agreement which

are likely to be of material detriment to you; or

 

(iii) increase the fixed periodic charges for your

Package (if applicable) by an amount which is

more than the percentage increase in the Retail

Prices Index Figure (or any future equivalent) in

any twelve month period.

 

You can end the agreement for such variations as

explained in Section 10.

 

Subject to the above, you will not be able to end the

agreement if such variation or increase:

 

(i) is due to changes to the law, government

regulation or licence which affect us; or

 

(ii) relates solely to Additional Services; or

 

(iii) relates solely to Add-on(s) (if applicable to you).

In such circumstances you will not be able to end

your agreement but you will be able to cancel the

Add-on(s) by giving us 30 days’ written notice; and

© if you carry on using Three Services after the

variation commences, you will be deemed to have

accepted the variation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked whether the increase was greater than the RPI?

 

Does the law/regs allow even that?

 

Your charges will be made up of various elements: texts, calls, phone (unless it was free!!) and data. Have they given you a breakdown of how they arrive at their prices before & after the increase? If not, you should ask for that so that you can confirm the size of the increase.

 

Have their charges for extra minutes etc also risen, and if so by how much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff,

 

Here is the part in the Three terms and conditions which states that we are unable to cancel without a cancellation charge. They are saying they are increasing their prices due to inflation and to cover their business costs. Even with what they have put in the terms and conditions, would myself as a customer be able to cancel without a charge by citing the UTCCR rules and regulations? The thing I'm most worried about as I've said is being blacklisted as I think that I may require a loan in the coming years for a house and a car. I'm planning on doing what you said and writing to them to tell them that I will be cancelling the direct debit from the date that the price increase occurs.

 

4. Variations to your agreement or prices

4.1 We may vary any of the terms of your agreement, - Where is the fairness in that.

including our Packages, on the following basis:

(a) any updated Packages and new terms will be

available on our website and on request to Three

Customer Services;

(b) we will let you know at least one month in advance

if we decide to:

(i) discontinue your Package; or

 

(ii) make any variations to your agreement which

are likely to be of material detriment to you; or

 

(iii) increase the fixed periodic charges for your

Package (if applicable) by an amount which is

more than the percentage increase in the Retail

Prices Index Figure (or any future equivalent) in

any twelve month period.

 

You can end the agreement for such variations as

explained in Section 10.

 

Subject to the above, you will not be able to end the

agreement if such variation or increase:

 

(i) is due to changes to the law, government

regulation or licence which affect us; or

 

(ii) relates solely to Additional Services; or

 

(iii) relates solely to Add-on(s) (if applicable to you).

In such circumstances you will not be able to end

your agreement but you will be able to cancel the

Add-on(s) by giving us 30 days’ written notice; and

© if you carry on using Three Services after the

variation commences, you will be deemed to have

accepted the variation.

 

It's all we we we, that is unfair, where was the consultation ? It's not good saying you had the choice of in or out, contracts don't work that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please i just call this company and i went mad with them they said that they have the right to do it, please help me my credit history is not good.

 

Don't call them on the telephone, only write to them, did you record the call you just made - if not, you have no record at all of what was said and they will say either they didn't record it or they can't find that bit.

 

It is 'not' up to them to decide what is detrimental to you. Now write and tell them the contract is ended from xx date as an amendment to it is detrimental to me and your T&C claiming you can do such a thing unitlateraly is an unfair term in accordance with the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

They have already made their contract out in such a manner that they don't come under the Consumer Credit Act so reducing your rights.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff,

 

Here is the part in the Three terms and conditions which states that we are unable to cancel without a cancellation charge. They are saying they are increasing their prices due to inflation and to cover their business costs. Even with what they have put in the terms and conditions, would myself as a customer be able to cancel without a charge by citing the UTCCR rules and regulations? The thing I'm most worried about as I've said is being blacklisted as I think that I may require a loan in the coming years for a house and a car. I'm planning on doing what you said and writing to them to tell them that I will be cancelling the direct debit from the date that the price increase occurs.

 

4. Variations to your agreement or prices

4.1 We may vary any of the terms of your agreement,

including our Packages, on the following basis:

(a) any updated Packages and new terms will be

available on our website and on request to Three

Customer Services;

(b) we will let you know at least one month in advance

if we decide to:

(i) discontinue your Package; or

 

(ii) make any variations to your agreement which

are likely to be of material detriment to you; or

 

(iii) increase the fixed periodic charges for your

Package (if applicable) by an amount which is

more than the percentage increase in the Retail

Prices Index Figure (or any future equivalent) in

any twelve month period.

 

You can end the agreement for such variations as

explained in Section 10.

 

Subject to the above, you will not be able to end the

agreement if such variation or increase:

 

(i) is due to changes to the law, government

regulation or licence which affect us; or

 

(ii) relates solely to Additional Services; or

 

(iii) relates solely to Add-on(s) (if applicable to you).

In such circumstances you will not be able to end

your agreement but you will be able to cancel the

Add-on(s) by giving us 30 days’ written notice; and

© if you carry on using Three Services after the

variation commences, you will be deemed to have

accepted the variation.

 

Do not cancel direct debits mid contract - there is no benefit in doing this as you rightly state your credit rating would be harmed by this action.

 

Three have insisted to me too that this is the section (4.1(b) ) that prevents me from cancelling my contract under section 10.1(d) However, if it is read correctly, it says no such thing.

Section 4, as I read it, allows three to do what ever they please to change your contract - they could raise prices by 1000% should they choose. Section 4.1(b) relates solely to their requirement to notify you about changes and has no effect whatever on section 10.1(d) They kindly point out three cirumstances in which you may cancel the contract under section 10.1(d), but this list can not be taken as exhaustive as if it were intended to be so, the condition would need to specifically state this.

The only limiting factor for being able to invoke section 10.1(d) is whether or not the change is of "detriment" (in the case of iPhone customers) or "material detriment" to other customers. If you can prove either of these, then section 10.1(d) applies - RPI is nothing more than a red-herring in this instance and has no relevance to section 10.1(d).

 

Three are attempting to make RPI significant by insisting that because the price increase is at RPI or below it is not a detriment. Three do not have the legal right to determine this - only a court can do so. OFCOM, the regulator has indicated that RPI increases are not of 'material detriment' but this statement was made in relation to a different company and a different contract (a significantly better worded contract by all accounts).

 

Three have clearly made a total pig's ear of this price increase and are now desperately trying to justify the fact they are not willing to abide by their own contract.

 

Getting Three to take their customers seriously is going to be difficult but not, I believe, impossible -

1) Word of mouth is a very powerful marketing tool - one happy customer will perhaps mention it to a couple of friends but a disgruntled customer will mention their bad experience to many, many more. I personally am now almost evangelical about telling anyone who's willing to listen how bad Three have treated me and how they would be crazy to sign a contract with Three. If enough people do this, Three will have difficulty in getting the new custom it so obviously craves.

2) Check your insurance policies for 'Legal Expenses Insurance' You may have insurance in place to pay for Legal action in consumer disputes such as this. If this is the case it might be an idea to investigate using the courts to compell Three to abide by their own contract. The more successfull small claims that are made, the more likely Three will cave in.

3) Write to their parent company in Hong Kong, pointing out how unhappy you are to be treated in such a dishonorable way. This may have no effect what ever, but it will raise awareness that the British public are not happy to be given the run around.

4) Terminate your contract as soon as legally possible. Do not cancel direct debits mid contract - this is not going to help you and will in all likelyhood not harm Three all that much either as they will simply sell the debt to a collection agency.

 

Whether or not Three will notice or even care that a whole bunch of previously happy customers are no longer willing to do business with them is open to question, but it's worth a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Telling Three you are canceling the contract as they have broken it, then canceling the DD is a dangerous game, but I believe it would be successful. If they report this on your credit file, you could then take them to court for £7000 (although £5000 would be smarter to keep it in small claims court) for "damages without proof" including removal of adverse information from your credit file (a-la Durkin vrs DSG + HFC http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/A187_04.html)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read the t&cs - they will give a months notice if they are going to increase the monthly payment by MORE than the RPI - presumably they wouldn't bother letting you know if they put it up by less??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just wondering if anyone has heard from Three regarding complaint or objection to the increase. I wrote to them but they have ignored it.

They never replied. Could anyone have had reply from them?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you didn't send by recorded delivery, they can deny ever receiving it, so send it again if it went by ordinary post. If not, go to the Royal Mail site and put the ticket number in and see who signed for it and then send an official complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Conniff,

 

At the time, I was out of the country and I could only reach them by email. I replied their email but I guess I should print and post it recorded now.

I was hoping that someone might have heard from them by now since it seems many people are affected.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Guys,Sorry for the delay. I called them to complain about the increase and how they don't state tha the price on the website or over the phone doesn't include vat and that they don't tell you that either oly i the welcome letter. at first they said they couldn't do anything about it but i said to them that i wasn't accepting it and was going to take legal action if they didn't reduce my contract to what i thought it was supposed to be - £29 not £35 with VAT added. After 3 weeks and 3 different phone calls, I was told that my contract would be £29 for the remainder of the contract (1 year) and that I was being back dated £72 worth of credit as a result of them charging me £5 vat without knowing it. BE PERSISTENT GUYS and don't take their crap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...