Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance head ache


annie.999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum but I'm desperate for some advice from anyone out there who can help me.

Here goes !!!

 

My daughter passed her test last June and in the first month got 3 pts for speeding SP50.

I am getting a motability car on Friday and my daughter wants to have my current car Mazda 6 that is on finance and has 18 months left on it.

The finance company won't let me change her on the V5 though say it's ok for her to drive if she's insured.

Her insurance on her megane is due mid June but they have quoted her with the change of car £6500 yes that's right you did have to look twice £6.5k.

Is there any cheaper option for her to drive my car for next 18 months, also how do I stand with cancelling my car insurance, does that tally ok with DVLA if I don't insure it myself.

 

Please advise as I'm so confused

Thanks

Mum with a head ache lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi annie

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers.

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is sh planning to sell teh megane then?

you will have to shop around for alternative qutes for the mazda, however you will have to declare that although you own it your daughter will be the main driver and her points etc.

Some companies apply an excess for young drivers ( under 21 or 25 ) and if under one year with a full licence.

Always tell the truth on forms or seeking insurance over the phone as any indiscreton they will not payout.

As you are no doubt aware young drivers are the biggest risk area, hence the large premiums to cover possible claims from TP damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mazda 6 for a young driver, with one speeding conviction = very expensive quotes.

 

I think I would look at options, to trade the car (subject to approval of finance company) for something that would be more suitable or ask the finance company about the costs of ending the finance early.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is sh planning to sell teh megane then?

you will have to shop around for alternative qutes for the mazda, however you will have to declare that although you own it your daughter will be the main driver and her points etc.

Some companies apply an excess for young drivers ( under 21 or 25 ) and if under one year with a full licence.

Always tell the truth on forms or seeking insurance over the phone as any indiscreton they will not payout.

As you are no doubt aware young drivers are the biggest risk area, hence the large premiums to cover possible claims from TP damage.

 

At the moment she is using my car on her own car insurance obviously only TP, my problem is the next 18 months, do I have to keep the car insured myself, as I'm on the V5 and all relevent documents, or can I cancel my insurance if she manages to get a cheaper quote, also mid June she would have passed her test a year and she is 27.

If she does keep her old car and re-insures with a cheaper company and continues to drive my car on a TP basis will there be any issues ref. police ANPR with me being the owner and her driving ?

Sorry about bombarding you with questions, but I desperately need to be clear for myself and my daughter.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not consult an insurance broker, such as Chriss Knott and discuss options with them to sort out cotss etc. on the different scenarios.

should not be a problem with her driving your car providing you maintain your insurance on it and she always carries her insurance certificate with her to confirm she is covered to drive your car on her policy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to be careful with the TP cover (Driving Other Cars) as often the cover does not cover anyone who is under 25 and sometimes they need to have held a licence for 2 years. Also in the print will be the stipulation that the vehicle is insured elsewhere. A cert usually has to exist.

The broker experienced posters (Unclebulgaria67 ?? ) will have a better idea about this than me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your help

 

I would seriously suggest that your daughter speaks to her Insurers about her using the 'driving other cars' (DOC) extension of her policy to drive your car on a regular basis. See if they are happy about this and that she would be covered for third party risks.

 

I only say this, as some Insurers do not like the DOC being used in this way and I don't think she would want to run the risk of her being liable for third party claims.

 

The other issue, is whether your finance company would be happy that she was not comprehensively covered when driving your car. If for sake of argument she crashed the car and it was her fault. You would have the remaining finance still to pay and your daughter may have a problem with the DOC cover, if her Insurers refuse to cover the third party risk.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly if your daughter crashes yuor car, and it was her fault, your car will not be covered and you would have to foot the repair costs or accept the total loss if written off. And you would still owe the finance co.

A risk too far IMO. Thats whats insurance is for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much everyone for all of your advice, I think I finally have it sorted (unless anyone can see a loophole )after speaking to a lovely lady at my local branch of Swintons. My current insurance won't entertain putting my daughter on my ins, so will cancel that & pay cancellation fee.

She advised me to take out a complete new policy for myself and my daughter as an named driver fully comp, just till the finance is finished then she can get her own insurance and have her name on the V5 and............ at a cost of only £350 for the year with my daughters fine and 3 points.

So "hopefully" happy days

Once again thanks for all your help you've all been great x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmmmm, if you take this option you make sure you cover your backside, make sure you have evidence to show this has been arranged by swintons in their full know of your facts, in the wrong way this could be percieved as fronting. Questions to ask, who is the main user of the vehicle, if it's your daughter, but you are saying it's you, then potentially there is trouble if a claim gets made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, have you told them you have another vehicle? and you are the main driver of that?

If they suspect your daughter will be the main user of the mazda, that could lead to problems down the road.

Its a risk, and you may get away with it, but you should be aware of what you are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly from personal experience what ever you decide do not under any circumstance choose Quote Me Happy they may appear very cheap but prove very expensive should an accident occur ... steer clear!!!M

 

 

 

 

 

Hi everyone, I'm new to this forum but I'm desperate for some advice from anyone out there who can help me.

Here goes !!!

 

My daughter passed her test last June and in the first month got 3 pts for speeding SP50.

I am getting a motability car on Friday and my daughter wants to have my current car Mazda 6 that is on finance and has 18 months left on it.

The finance company won't let me change her on the V5 though say it's ok for her to drive if she's insured.

Her insurance on her megane is due mid June but they have quoted her with the change of car £6500 yes that's right you did have to look twice £6.5k.

Is there any cheaper option for her to drive my car for next 18 months, also how do I stand with cancelling my car insurance, does that tally ok with DVLA if I don't insure it myself.

 

Please advise as I'm so confused

Thanks

Mum with a head ache lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your daughter is going to be the main user of the vehicle then you can't just add her as a "named driver" to a policy in your name: this is called "fronting" and is a form of insurance fraud: you are obtaining cheaper insurance by misrepresenting the facts. The insurance proposal will ask you who is the main user - if you truthfully state that the main user is your daughter, the policy will be rated on her. If you lie, and say you are the main user then you may be committing a crime. Insurers are increasingly aware of this practice for young drivers and in the event of a claim, may void the policy, refuse to pay claims, prosecute for fraud etc. Sorry, not trying to scare you but I have seen all this happen. Sometimes, they will just charge additional premium based on the extra that should have been paid but if you have deliberately misrepresented the facts to obtain a cheaper premium, they are likely to be less forgiving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...