Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and gals 1st post for me

 

i`m not really an internet person (well just for poker) after waiting a while to hear about my ppi claim with yorkshire bank i came across this site (3 weeks ago) .I Have had a good browse and only wish i had found it 3 months ago or at least done some research ..as i suppose you can guess i have gone with one of the many firms that kept bugging and bugging me every other day by phone etcetc ..well the good thing is they got me thinking and sure as damn it i had ppi on a loan in 2005 (large loan at that)i repaid the loan by the means of a 2nd mortgage again with yorks bank

 

well just to let you know i got a letter 5th april advising me they are looking into my complaint etcetc so i or my claims company exspect to hear something soon ,,, i understand 8 weeks from date of their original letter of looking into complaint letter ?? maybe one of the experts on here can advise on that for me ??

 

i dont have a clue what to exspect back as have sent original loan docs to claims company and like mentioned before settled the loan early .. i can say the loan was repaid 2007 ppi was just over 6k with 2k plus interest but i wont have paid all that interest with paying the loan off early ..i assume in settling the loan i will have paid all the ppi initial cost ???? i read and read and read on here but still im no wiser as what to expect back :oops: :oops: :oops:

 

ps the claims company i am using is consumer first and apart form original letter ..and one letter since to say yb have been in touch .. going to be a bloomin good pay day for them if they get the result 1st time ...and for what i see on here i could have done all myself for the cost of a few stamps :x :x :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

 

They will have 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the claim to give you a final decision before the matter can be referred to fos.

 

What you should expect back is the entire premium plus the interest you would have paid through your monthly payments plus 8% on those payments made running from the date of payment to the date of settlement.

 

In addition it is likely that you would have overpaid the PPI on settlement of the loan, even if they did give you a rebate, so you should get interest on that as well.

 

Very difficult to be precise as you haven't quoted any figures for PPI above.

 

I hope you kept copies of the documents you sent this claims outfit. Sadly I thyink it is too late to get out of the contract you have with them.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ims for your reply .. i gathered it too late to get out of the claims clutches but anything back will be a bonus for me :-)

 

am i correct in thinking that i will only get back the payments i made for the 2 years until settlement ?? with interest or will my settlement of the loan also included the ppi original cost but with out the extra 5 years of interest payments due to early settlement ??

 

once again thanks for the info and i`ll be ure to keep you informed as the 8 week period before fos is due on 29th of may so another week or its going into the hand of the fos ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

and sadly no i didnt keep any copies of the loan agreement . but 1st thing in morning im going to ring them and ask for the original loan agreement back.. any decent firm would surely have copied them and sent the original back straight away

 

i know its only speculation on your part .. but from your time here would you say yorkshire bank are playing hard to get. or generally paying up without the need for fos ???

 

many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i got the loan from within the bank ,, i was told that i would only be able to have the loan if i took ppi as it was a large loan (23k) the amount also paid of an exsisting loan (no ppi)

 

i wasnt clearly explained the ins and outs of it just asked if i i understood what ppi was ,,, and needing the loan as i did at the time just said yeah

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ims21 ..just to add i think your doing a sterling job in helping joe bloggs

 

 

think of all the 20% / 30% you could be earning you could be almost as rich as the fat cat bank managers that have been fleecing us all for years :lol: :lol:

 

im not sure about the claims handling company when i asked what to expect they didnt know and wouldnt even say roughly .. they just said they wrote asking for a refund and not mentioned any figures..they told me they left that to them to make an offer ..also whe i mentioned the 8 week period they told me something whent off in jsanuary and that all claims were put back due to large numbers ? will i have to promt them to go to fos if i dont hear anything by end of next week or should i trust in them and just let them get on with what is there job now ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes I'm in the wrong business :lol:

 

These claims companies do talk drivel. Prior to January the FSA granted extensions of time but from January it is back to the standard 8 weeks.

 

I would wait the 8 weeks and see what happens. It is your decision as to whether to pass to fos or not, not theirs.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to update rang yorkshire bank today to see what date my complaint letter was recieved by them .. the response was we have posted you and your claims company a letter yesterday which is 2nd class and can take 5 to 10 working days to arrive (10 days wtf ) anyway he whent on to tell me he didnt know the decision as its not on his screen and is confidential ..

 

he then told me that if any redress is due and the complaint is upheld that me and only me will recieve this as i and only i need to sign and return it to them .

 

well in my eyes that means its been refused as he already told me they sent claims company a letter too

 

guess all i can do now is wait till next week for the letter and then set the ball rolling for fos action

Edited by coolmiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

could it be that they have wrote to me with an settlement offer but still had to write to claims company to inform them that they have made an offer to make sure they are sticking within the timescale in the claims people eyes ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yep....nosebag....food :-)

 

Ok so in answer to your PM questions.

 

They have made an offer for the years paid before this was taken over by a mortgage. That principle is correct.

 

You would get back the amounts actually paid towards the PPI part of the loan plus the interest paid on that and 8% on each payment actually made running from the date of the payment to the date of settlement.

 

Now, when the loan was taken over by the mortgage, part of the balance taken over would have been the remaining PPI on the loan, less any rebate that may have been given (I would suggest that no rebate was given).age

 

So you had to borrow extra money on your mortgage to pay off part of the PPI on the loan. This is why they are saying that there will be an adjustment to the mortgage, to remove the residual PPI from it.

 

This is all based around the underlying principle that you must be put back in a position that you would have been in had the PPI not been added in the first place.

 

In order to work out the figures to see whether their offer is correct we would need the figures from the agreement. I see you were going to ask for the return of that document....did you ever get it back?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims ..

i have read a further couple of times and i see it like this

repayments of loan untill settles redress 2.4k

standard 8% 1.0k

 

then the tricky bit ... as your loan was settled by means of a mortgage i will deduct from your mortgage account 1.8k as this is the difference on what you paid into sed loan and the settlement figure .. upon your appceptance we will also recalculate any interest to your mortgage account

 

so all in all 5.2k RESULT me thinks but i only see 3.4k pay tax and the claims company :mad2:

2 questions really

1 can pay off my mortgage as the mortgage paid the loan off ?? still paying the mortgage and still should be my money

2 will i have to pay claims % of whole amount even though i havent recieved it

oh and 3 will i have to pay tax on whole amount of 8 % or can i decuct the % of claims fee then pay 20% of that ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok I'll answer the questions in reverse order

 

The taxable portion of your award is only the 8% statutory interest...not the rest of it.

 

You will pay the claims company a percentage of the entire claim amount, both the physical refund and any adjustment made to the mortgage as a result of the residual PPI. So in effect this is the premium in full, the contractual interest paid and the 8%.

 

Now the bit that needs more work. Can you tell me whether your mortgage is a repayment mortgage or interest only?

 

The lender should put firm figures to you before you accept. It is not right that they say we will adjust the mortgage upon receipt of your acceptance if they haven't told you what the value of the adjustment is going to be. Bear in mind that if you have been making mortgage payments then the PPI part of those payments should come back to you by way of refund plus 8%. It is the future payments that should be affeceted by an adjustment to payments.

 

It is not possible to work out exactly what you should get back unless you can get that loan agreement back

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and my question realating to the tax man was ,,,, i jnow i have to pay 20% of the gran i got for my 8% intetrdy psrt as it is paid gross

but as the claims company will get 20%:mad2: will i have to pay tax on 1k or 800.00 ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes but part of that mortgage would have included residual PPI from the first loan and therefore you have been paying PPI on loan 1 through your mortgage.

 

Think of it this way...

 

You have a loan for £9,000 with PPI of £1,000 added to it so a total of £10,000 which you pay off at, say £100 per month. Let's assume the loan is interest free to avoid complication.

 

You make 10 payments and then convert the loan to a mortgage. 10 payments would mean you will have paid £1,000 off the loan leaving a balance of £9,000 which is refinanced into a mortgage. Part of that £9,000 is the PPI part of the loan.

 

In this example the PPI is 10% of the total loan so 10% of that £9,000 balance is the PPI part of the loan which of course is £900.

 

So if that PPI hadn't been in the loan to start with then you would have had to borrow £900 less on the mortgage to pay off the first loan.

 

So the fact that you had to borrow £900 more to pay of the PPI part of the loan means that some of the repayments you are making on the mortgage include a percentage towards that £900 part of the first loan.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in a nut shell they have refunded that 1.8k that was part of the loan ppi ... all good and well but is it right that they can now just take it of the mortgage balance ??

forget the pm i jumped to page 2 lol i know im an idiot .that my thread title suggests hehe

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...