Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

sick vs Hillesden securities / Alpins


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello again all, I have already been here before spookily almost 1 year to the day when I got CCJ paperwork from Arrow Global and the case was struck out in the end. This time its Hillesden Securities and they already seem to be better prepared than the last lot!

I'm after a bit of guidance if possible please:

Claim form from Northampton CCBC dated 2nd May 2012

Claimant Hillesden Securities Ltd

Via Alpins.

POC:

The claimants claim is in respect of a credit facility, ACCOUNT NUMBER, provided by Lloyds TSB Bank PLc at the defendants request on 03/12/1999. The agreement was subsequently defaulted. Failure to meet requests for payment resulted in the account being terminated on 15/07/2011, all legal and beneficial interest for the monies was assigned to Hillesden securities Ltd. The defendant was duly notified in writing of the assignment and the balance of £2341.65 was due. The balance of £2341.65 remains owing from the defendant.

 

OK I have done the AOS on line on 15th May with the intention to defend in full.

On 16th May I sent a CPR request 31.14

On 16th May I also sent Section 78 request with £1 postal order.

 

Today I got a letter from DLC Direct Legal Collections (trading name of Hillesden securities) saying the following:

 

We have been passed a copy of your letter dated 16th May 2012 by our solicitors.

We acknowledge receipt of your request for information filed in accordance with Part 31.14 of the civil procedure rules.

We are still awaiting copy documentation from the original lender and will forward it to you in due course. We confirm that your account will remain on hold until we have done so.

Should you require an extension of time to file your defence pursuant to part 15 of the practice directions we will consent to an extension of 28 days.

You have also requested a copy of your credit agreement under s.78 Consumer Credit Act 1974. As you have requested a copy of this document as part of your CPR Request, we are returning your fee.

Yours sincerely

Litigation department.

 

The thing that is giving me some worry is that these lot sound a whole lot more on the ball than the last lot as they have already anticipated my request for an extension (which I have not yet asked for waiting as I was waiting for the reply to my requests!)

Am I on the right track and I'm not sure what difference it makes that it is through Northampton (last time it was the local court to the solicitor) I am sure last time I was advised that Northampton do things automatically without the request of the claimant so how do I go about the extension they have agreed in the letter??

Many thanks in advance if anyone is free to help me out again!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sick my old friend I trust you are well, apart from....

 

So what will the defence be based on?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy!! Oh I was hoping you would visit!!!:whoo: thank you,

defence will be based the same as last time it will be to see what they can prove.....

 

this letter has just unsettled me slightly as last time arrow global had no idea what they were doing and this lot seem a bit more on the ball!!

Hope you are keeping well and so glad your still around!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always around I lock up on the way out:madgrin:

 

No the difference here is the these lot think they know what they are doing:wink: Have you submitted your extension CPR 15.5 to get the full 56 days?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats reasuring Andy thanks, I got the letter agreeing to an extension I had not requested this morning and was not sure of the process with Northampton (last time it was the sols local court) Do I need to send a copy of the letter from DLC to the court to say they have agreed an extension or will I need to get them to agree an extension date in writing? I'm thinking I need to get them to agree an ACTUAL date and to confirm it in writing to me which I need to confirm to the court? Does it matter that I have sent my AOS on line rather than by post?? Northampton is confusing me!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy that letter and attach a cover letter from you requesting an extension pursuent to CPR 15,5 as agreed in the attached with the Claimant.Post to CCBC then check its receipt and that its on the system Ie new defence date is ....?

 

No problem with MCOL better and far more secure than posting everything.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, can I just check my dates?

Date on the claim form is 2nd May.

5 days = 7th May.

AOS takes it 28 days from 7th May to 4th June 2012.

the letter states I can have an extension of 28 days so do I add that to my 28 days from my AOS tking me to 2nd July (4th june + 28days = 2nd July)

And do I put all that in my letter to the court and send a copy to the solicitors and just for good measure to the claimant who agreed it??

Just trying to get it straight in my head!!:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes correct, state extension of 28 days, ie 2nd July will be my new date for submitting my defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need to send anyone else a copy but the Court Sick.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Spoke to the court who have advised me that they have not processed my letter yet and that they "basically dont care its up to the claimant when they apply for judgement we just put a copy of the letter on file" am I still working with my extended date??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats how it basically works Sick as long as you have their agreement in writing then they cant (shouldn't ) request judgment before that date.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy, last time it was through a local court but this claim is through MCOL does it matter??

 

Nooo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sick (& Andy), in same boat too. same dates to submit by.

 

Just doing the research to prep my defence, although I'm off out now. Still waiting on DN & NOA from my CPR requests. I will follow your thread: (mine's here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?351516-County-Court-Claim-Hillbillies-(prev-MBNA)&p=3847236&viewfull=1#post3847236

been away this week so trying to catch up)

 

PS. Court said same thing to me regarding extension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, defence day today and I have prepared the following, just wanted to check it sounds ok before i hit "submit"!!!

 

THE DEFENDANT IS UNABLE TO PLEAD DUE TO THE CLAIMANTS FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH ITS CPR 31.14 DUTIES IN DISCLOSING THE REQUESTED

DOCUMENTS.AS REQUESTED FROM THEM BY LETTER DATED 16TH MAY 2012 AND

AKNOWLEDGED BY THEM BY LETTER DATED 18TH MAY 2011. THEY HAVE ALSO

FAILED TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CREDIT AGREEMENT REQUESTED UNDER

SECTION 78 OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974, REQUESTED FROM THEM BY

LETTER DATED 16TH OF MAY AND AKNOWLEDGED RECIEPT BY THE CLAIMANT

VIA LETTER ON 18TH MAY 2012.THE DEFENDANT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

AMEND THIS DEFENCE

 

and Hi Battlescars and welcome I'll have a look at your thread too thanks!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an alternative feel free to edit or merge

 

 

o I, ********** of ************** make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by **************

o The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR16 even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system

o No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered and despite a request to the claimant for further information CPR31.14 none has been forth coming and as a result I cannot plead in defence to the claim

o The claimant pleads that the claim is brought under a regulated credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974,but is yet to comply with my section 78 request.

o Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit

o Further to that above , the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an alternative feel free

 

 

o I, ********** of ************** make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by **************

o The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR16 even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system

o No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered and despite a request to the claimant for further information CPR31.14 none has been forth coming and as a result I cannot plead in defence to the claim

o The claimant pleads that the claim is brought under a regulated credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974,but is yet to comply with my section 78 request.

o Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit

o Further to that above , the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Wow! Thanks andy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i am officially living up to my name now.... Sick as a chip! Today a copy of a credit agreement has turned up in the post with an offer to settle for a discount and a letter to say they are looking for the rest of the documents i have requested and will send me them as soon as they find them! Can anyone advise how i can post them here to make sure they are ok? Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...