Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AMEX admit NO agreement but assigned to Moorcroft to chase


lochlisa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That is a notice of termination not a default notice. If you have not received a default notice, I would get a SAR into Amex ASAP to find out what they have done. The account history should show something

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, too much wine last night !

 

here is the letter from January.

 

I should add that the account is in dispute and has been for a few months as Amex are unable to provide a copy of the original agreement.

 

 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/59427059@N03/5438584872/in/photostream/

Edited by lochlisa
additional information
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

hi all,

 

 

Amex have confirmed that they do not hold an original card agreement but they have assigned the debt to Moorcroft who, they say, have every right to chase the debt despite it being in dispute.

 

Am I correct that without the original agreement there is little chance of a court case and can I just ignore Moorcroft and tell them to get lost?

 

They are constantly phoning and writing, despite being instructed only to conduct communication in writing.

 

What exactly should I do?

 

thanks, Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you logging their calls? You might want to get Trucall to help with that. Also it can block their number so you won't be bothered by them. I can't offer you definitive advice as I'm not anyone legal but I'd suggest if there's no agreement then there's no debt. I understand there's no debt anyway in law until it's been to court, it's an alleged debt till then. Anyone happy to confirm that? Well, if there's no agreement been made then I doubt you'll be seeing a court which is why the frighteners are on you, they can't do much else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lisa,

 

How old is this debt?

 

I suggest the following to the Compliance Manager at Moorcroft.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Ref: xxxxxxxxx xxxx

 

I write regarding you correspondence concerning the debt for xxxxx xxx

which you allege is owed by me,.

Take note I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company you

may claim to represent.

 

I should remind you that this matter is in dispute with you client and

until that dispute is settled no further communication can be entered

into.

 

I now require you to cease all contact with me until the dispute is settled.

 

I will report any further contact to the OFT.

OFT Guidance Section 3.7 (o) States that: Ignoring and or disregarding

claims that a debt is disputed and continuing to make demands for payment

without providing clear justification and or evidence as to why the claim is

not valid..

 

Send it RD

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you cease payment Lisa?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

payments ceased over 2 years ago now

 

Just wondered as there have been a number of Amex recon agreements

for old accounts, no sign of that here:-D

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...