Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Refuses to Cancel Continuous Payment Authority


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3637 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Although I didn't really have the time. I printed off the above link and legged it down to Barclays where I spoke to the same person as yesterday, the Assistant Manager. Showed her the print out and she showed no interest whatsoever and just repeated what she said yesterday, "I can only go off what the policy section says", shrugged her shoulders and left to go back to a meeting; but not before I told her that I wouldn't let it lie and she is on the hit list! She just told me to contact Disputed Transactions or whatever. Why the heck should I, it's an 0870 number, can't find an alternative.

 

In my mind, if I have printed evidence that Barclays are carrying out the incorrect procedure the surely, in the interest of the customer, it should be investigated; or is the level on customer service we have come to accept!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go back, and tell her you require her name, employee number and relevant details as you will be contacting their complaints department with a view to persuing court action.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

She'll change her mind when you tell her that you will call her up for a court appearance in due course.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite being told that I had withdrawn my permission for the CPA's, the "merchants" have been at my account. I had changed my card details so Barclays are quite prepared to release funds through the account number only. Absolutely disgraceful. I mean, I cancelled my card then put it in the hole in the wall, but they wouldn't let me have any cash; where's the difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first draft, wondering if it's too long and should be straight to the point. Any advice please?

 

Dear Mr Chan

 

It gives me no great pleasure writing this but I have to tell you how disgusted I am with Barclays regarding its stance on Continuing Payment Authority (CPAS) or Continuous Authorised Transactions (CATS) as Barclays prefer to call them. May I draw your attention to the following and then take immediate action regarding our account.

 

Withdrawal of permission of Continuous Payment Authority.

 

Pay day loan firms will say this is not possible, but it is - in accordance with Regulation 55 of The Payment Services Regulations 2009:

55.—(1) A payment transaction is to be regarded as having been authorised by the payer for the purposes of this Part only if the payer has given its consent to—

 

(a) the execution of the payment transaction; or.

(B) The execution of a series of payment transactions of which that payment transaction forms part. .

(2) Such consent—

 

(a) may be given before or, if agreed between the payer and its payment service provider, after the execution of the payment transaction; and.

(b) must be given in the form, and in accordance with the procedure, agreed between the payer and its payment service provider. .

(3) The payer may withdraw its consent to a payment transaction at any time before the point at which the payment order can no longer be revoked under regulation 67.

 

(4) Subject to regulation 67(3) to (5), the payer may withdraw its consent to the execution of a series of payment transactions at any time with the effect that any future payment transactions are not regarded as authorised for the purposes of this Part.

 

This means that you can simply ask your bank to refuse the payments; it is also good practice to let the lender know too.

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/static/pubs/consumer_info/know_your_rights_guide.pdf

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/consumer_info/know_your_rights_payments.pdf

Since 2009, this law has been in place where a customer can request the bank to immediately cease paying CATS by withdrawing his/her permission previously granted. Sadly, Barclays appears to be above the law as it has this week, point blank refused to cease paying these payments out of my wife’s and I joint account. I have received no co – operation at all from anyone at Barclays. Everyone has the same answer, “we can’t do that”. Well, I’m sorry Mr Chan, you can do that. I respectfully request that you contact my Barclays branch and get them to cancel the CAPS/CATS we have against our account. I will hold you personally responsible for all charges I have incurred since requesting cessation of these payments made since Monday night, 30th April 2012 and the return of these payments deducted from my account since requesting the cessation.

 

Because of a change in circumstances, we knew that we would not be able to fulfil our obligations this month to cover our CATS and subsequently withdrew all funds leaving only enough to cover up – coming cheques and direct debits. Although I do not have an overdraft facility (I’ve asked many times but been refused), Barclays allowed me to go into an overdraft after paying out part payments on CATS! When I realised what had happened I used the Telephone Banking Service (TPS) to request cessation of the CATS. I spoke to three different people and each one said they could not stop them. I repeatedly told them that “I withdraw my permission to make any further Continuous Authorised Transactions from our account”. Sadly, this request fell on deaf ears. As you can imagine, I was, and still am, absolutely livid. Because your staff and perhaps even Barclays are ignorant of the law, I am suffering great inconvenience. Because of the insistence that CATS could not be stopped, I even cancelled our Debit cards making any information Merchants held invalid. I was told that this would make no difference. I find that incredible. If I cancel my debit card then put it in an ATM and request cash, it will not be dispensed, what is the difference? As I got nowhere in telephone conversations, I visited my local branch of Barclays on Tuesday, 1st May just on the off chance that it was more up to date with procedure. Again, it was a waste of time. I spoke with the assistant manager who also adamant that she was unable to put a stop to the CATS, even taking the moral stance, “you’ve had the loan, it must be repaid”. This has nothing to do with the situation at all and she was out of order even mentioning it! At my continued insistence, she eventually rang the Disputed Transactions department and once again, yes, you’ve guessed it, I was given the same reply. On Wednesday I re – visited my branch and again spoke with the Assistant Manager and showed her printed proof that the CATS can be stopped by the customer requesting them to be and it is not necessary for the merchant to do so. All I got was a shrug of the shoulders and she again refused to help me. Should it come to court action then I will have no hesitation in naming her on the papers.

 

Now Mr Chan, I have wasted a lot of time this week chasing Barclays around the houses. I am sure that you are more au – fait with the law than the staff of Barclays. I insist that you take immediate action to contact my branch or a central banking section and have them put a stop on all of my CATS and refund all the payments that I have made since first requesting cessation of same and in addition, any charges/prospective charges that I will incur due to unpaid cheques and direct debits. I will also be requesting a compensation payment to cover the cost of all unnecessary telephone calls and for goodwill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Way way too long, too much chatter and not enough getting to the point, they just won't bother to read all that.

 

Letter Before Action.

Ref the relevent law.

Day, dates and time you have told them to stop and 7 days to return all the payments made failure to stop payments and reimburse all payments, cancellation of fees because those payments made yu overdrawn or whatever plus interest. Failure to to do the above within 10 working days will lead to a court summons without any further notice.

 

Don'#t threaten court unless you are prepared to go that far though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, too much banter. Just had another 20 minutes with telephone banking. Still say they can't do it. They say they'd have to write to the merchants and ask them to cancel the authorities but the merchants would just come back with a signed contract. Flogging a dead horse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I opened a CO-OP basic bank account some 2 years ago on the phone,came with Visa debt card,DD and very easy to log in on line and see my payments in and out.

 

Just dont go overdrawn...

 

joesoap Good luck with Barclayfarts...

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Treat it like a regular letter.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write back and ask them do they understand that they are blatantly breaking the law by saying what they have said.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...