Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

reply that I will be sending back:-

 

 

Dear Sir/ Madam,

 

I do not appreciate you writing back to me asking me for exact reasons for the mis-selling of PPI on my account. I am sure that you are fully aware of all the reasons why you have been mis-selling PPI to your customers. One of the reasons why you have been selling PPI to customers is when they are either self-employed/unemployed, you only have to take a brief look at my account to realise that this applies to me. I would gratefully appreciate it if you did not waste anymore of my time by asking me questions that you could easily find out by yourself by taking a look at my account. I hope now that this can be resolved as quickly as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no I didnt ims, I have had so many loans/CC over the years that I really wasnt looking forward to doing all the FOSQ's and also had the problem that I had to send some of them off to multiple addresses as for some companies no one was too sure where they should be sent! even tho I was going to do it, but i was discussing with a friend about the PPI claims and he told me that he also had many loans/CC and he simply wrote a simple letter to them asking for the refund to all the companies for which he was very successful with. so I adopted this strategy in hope that I will have the same success, and the ones that dont play ball I will then do it by the proper means as suggested on this site. I just thought doing it this way I might save myself a lot of time and aggro. I have had replies from Monument, Tesco and MBNA stating that they are investigating and will be in touch. I have had three exactly the same responses from barclaycard asking me to fill in the FOSQ but im sure these arent all to do with the same account but they havnt quoted the accounts in question and all have the same reference! And this reply from RBS which this thread is for!

Edited by d1cky
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...