Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Comet sold me a faulty tablet


ocdc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Too right, the Retailer is responsible.

 

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38311.html

 

But it is not the consumers job to deal with anyone but the seller. What happens if you deal direct and the manuf sends you another one and that breaks down, the seller can then come back and say 'that's not the product I sold you', they have done it before.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes totally agree Connif ,

 

I do not know how this stands under Consumer Law or SOGA when a Product fails as far as the customer is concerned .

 

The fact is some Manufacturers insist on carrying out their own repairs to goods that are sold by a retailer this may be one of these types of instances hence the fact that COMET have advised ocdc to contact ACER direct .

 

Comet Service may not have the means to take on repairs to certain items and in these instances it is because the Manufacturer does not want anyone else attempting a repair on certain products within the first 12 months.

 

This procedure usually comes to light when a customer contacts COMET first with regards to a faulty product within 12 months and after a certain number of days since purchase and is flagged up by the SKU or Product number which will advise the Selling Store the SLA (Service Level Agreement)

 

For Example "return to Comet Service" , "Replace the Product" , or "Customer to contact Manufacturer"

 

ocdc has dealt direct with the seller so far and by all accounts his Tablet is being sent somewhere for repair where that is who knows .

Edited by GorgieBoy

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i think 28 days is the norm.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I was told I was going to get text message updates on the status of the repair process, but havent heard from them. I secretely wish they`ll lose it so I can get a new tablet, but knowing my luck, I`ll probably get the same one back, in the same or worse condition it was before. Anyway, what do I do if I dont hear from them after 28 days? Something tells me I wont. I am very very sceptical and pessimistic by nature, and generally get exactly what I expect which is nothing. At least I can never be dissapointed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right fellas. On the 28th of this month it`ll be 28 days since I havent seen my tablet. I havent heard from them either. Can I demand that they give my tablet back after 28 days or what...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ocdc ,

 

Email the directors Office ,

 

[email protected]

 

They should respond within 24hours and at least give you a definate answer with regards to your ongoing issue.

 

Quote the Job number and time scale , all in all not good is it not even any update from them or anything some 28 days down the road .

Regards

GorgieBoy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Emailed the directors office too.

Its been 2 months, no update, no reply.

I dont want to call because of the ridiculous charge. I can afford it no worries but its the principle. I dont even need nor want that ****ing tablet, I just wanted to see how far would they go with this. But now its been too long. What are my options?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you tried sending them a nice Tweet or a nice message via :-

 

http://twitter.com/CometLtd/

 

or

 

http://www.facebook.com/cometuk

 

Emailed the directors office too.

Its been 2 months, no update, no reply.

I dont want to call because of the ridiculous charge. I can afford it no worries but its the principle. I dont even need nor want that ****ing tablet, I just wanted to see how far would they go with this. But now its been too long. What are my options?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent because I dont use twitter and use facebook exclusively for showing off my muscles to redhead foreign girls, my recent fetish (joking). But I might get /b/ to raid their page. If you dont know what /b/ is, youre one of the lucky ones.

On a serious note, legally, how can I make them go "hmmm, internet is serious business"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...