Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Result!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey!

 

HSBC have took almost 2 months to get back to me...and after they told me over the phone that they wouldnt refund the £400.00 in charges, they refunded £200 of it today into my account!!!

 

Now, I am happy with that result, but I can't help wondering why they simply didnt refund all of it?!

 

On another note, the Co-Operative bank withdrawn my student account because I have one with HSBC (my own fault), and demanded the £1000 overdraft back. I offered £2 a month after they charged me £60 for a letter. They weren't impressed, but they had no choice to accept it.

 

Now the good news. I got a letter this morning saying they wanted me to call them. I did and they said they could cut the £1000 to £500...I said I could pay £250 today but would struggle to pay the other £250. They then said they would accept £250!!!!

 

They didnt ask for any proof that I couldnt pay back the remaining £250, which, if I did, they would find out I could pay the whole amount!

 

I was kinda confused as to why they bothered to call me after we had both agreed to pay it back!

 

I just thought I'd share my success story with you all :) Any further advice on claiming back the £200 would be appreciated. My bf, who's a solicitor, said I may as well leave it now considering my luck so far!

 

Danny :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC I would say "Thanks for the £200, where is the other £200 or shall I proceed to legal action?"

 

Why didn't refund all of it? They are in the business of making money and they are hoping you will be happy with half. they know they are liable for £400 but they are hoping you will be impressed with half that!

Abbey (Charges on 3 accounts and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 30/03/06 - 40 days limit is 9th May - Recieved DPA printouts 05/04/06 with microfiche "fob off" letter. <p>Barclaycard (Charges on 1 account and default on my credit record) - DPA letter sent 03/04/06 - 40 days limit is 13th May - Recieved some statements 08/04/06 along with DPA printout and a microfiche "fob off" letter. Claim for £340 sent 11/04/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've been lucky with the Co-Op, but to me that doesn't dismiss HSBC's responsibility to refund you what you're owed.

 

They may have refunded half, but I'd definitely still pursue the rest. To refund half to me shows that they must know they've done wrong in taking it in the first place...

£2,352 + interest + costs claim from HSBC:

29/12: Re-started process.

January/February: Letters, LBA, etc sent.

12/3: Deadlines passed.

2/4: Court papers served.

26/4: Defence submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any further advice on claiming back the £200 would be appreciated. My bf, who's a solicitor, said I may as well leave it now considering my luck so far!

 

As a solicitor, he should know that it's not luck.

 

The banks are acting unlawfully and IMO they know it. If you'd held out for £400, you would have got it.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a solicitor, he should know that it's not luck.

 

The banks are acting unlawfully and IMO they know it. If you'd held out for £400, you would have got it.

 

Yeah, he didnt say it as simple as "it's good luck. dont do anymore"...it was like "You've got £200 back, maybe you should just leave it now?"...I think he was bothered I was ringing him at work, especially today as his firm are in the middle of exchanging a couple of boeing planes (or something as equally as boring as that)...

 

What would you advise I do? Ring my branch? Ring customer services?

 

Danny :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you signed anything accepting the offer?

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. They sent me a letter about a week ago saying they were still looking into it and I should expect a reply with the decision and explanation by the 7th.

 

I won't know whether I get the letter tomorrow as I have come home for the easter hols...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the letter they sent me regarding the £200.00 out of the £400.00 owed refunded:

 

I write further to our letter dated 24 February, having completed my enquiries into the issues raised in your recent letters. Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to you. **(I don't)**

 

I would confirm that your account was opened on 12 November 2004, and as such you were provided with an interest free overdraft of £1,000 in line with our Student Service package. **(Am I mean't to be ungrateful for the interest free overdraft?!)**

 

Any borrowing over this amount will attract debit interest at 1.16% in line with our published tariff. I would confirm that the debit interest applied to your account is correct and will stand.

 

You will appreciate that it is the responsibility of the account holder to ensure sufficient funds are available to meet items which are due for payment. Where this is not acheived items may be returned unpaid or the account be paid overdrawn with subsequent charges accrued in line with the bank's published tariff.

 

On each occasion cheques, direct debits or standing orders have to be returned unpaid the bank's standard charge of £30 is applied. The charge may be reduced to £10 or waived if the value of the item is less than £30. A similar charge is applied where an item has to be paid because it has been drawn in conjunction with a cheque guarantee card or authorised via Maestro. This is shown on a customer's statement as 'card misuse'.

 

It is not the bank's normal policy to refund correctly applied charges, however I do note your comments and have exceptionally arranged to refund £200.00 to your account a gesture of our goodwill.

 

Please note that all future correctly applied charges to your account will stand. To clarify matters we do not agree with the contention that the charges have been imposed by the bank constitute a penalty clause and are therefore unenforceable.

 

The bank does not agree with your contention that the charges that have been imposed constitute a penalty and are therefore unenforceable. The contract between the bank and its customer is governed by our Personal Terms & Conditions. In respect of overdrafts, I would refer you specifically to clause 7.11 in section 2. If you authorise a payment that would, if met by us, lead to your account going overdrawn, or over an agreed limit, the bank considers whether or not to make this payment and a fee is payable for this service.

 

Our fees and charges are clearly stated in our published price list, and the circumstances in which these charges will apply are clearly set out in our terms and conditions, of which you will have been provided with a copy when you opened your account.

 

Thank you for taking the time to bring your concerns to the bank's attention. I trust matters can now be considered concluded. However if this is not the case, the next step in our complaint handling procedures is detailed on the enclosed guidance sheet.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Mr M Cole

Customer Service Officer.

 

Ok...so when has an unskilled worker with most likely no qualifications be in a position to decide what's legal and what's not?!??

 

Why did it take them 7 WEEKS to reply when I gave them 14 days?!

 

I feel really offended now. Without this letter, I would have probably left it. But now I want to take it further if I can.

 

They didn't provide me with a list of charges as requested, they didn't respond within a sufficient time, they're rude and they admit their mistakes but then blame it on me!

 

They also included 3 booklets on their ridiculous terms and conditions and a letter with an address if I'm not satisfied with the response...

 

Any advice?

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write back stating that as they are already out of the initial 14 days you should, by rights start proceedings immediately.

 

Accept their £200 offer, but make it clear that you will be going back for the rest.

 

However, on this occassion, and in view of the fact that they are at least attempting to negotiate, you will allow a further 7 days for them to refund in full or you will start legal proceedings against them.

 

You could add:

 

"You will appreciated that it is for the author of a contract to ensure that it complies with UK law, and this matter will be tested in court should you refuse to refund the full amount within this timescale."

 

"You should also be aware that although it is against my better judgement to allow you a further 7 days, but in view of your last letter, I am prepared on this occassion to allow you to right this wrong.

 

In your letter you state:

 

"It is not the bank's normal policy to refund correctly applied charges, however I do note your comments and have exceptionally arranged to refund £200.00 to your account a gesture of our goodwill."

 

I believe that you are misguided and as a gesture of goodwill I will allow one final attempt for you to comply with basic UK contract law.

 

As it is the opinion of the law, the OFT and myself that these charges ARE a penalty and should not have been levied I trust you will see the error of your judgement and return the full amount to me within the required timscale.

 

Failure to do so will result in legal proceedings being taken against you with no further notice.

 

I look forward to your valued reply,

 

Yours

 

Dannster.

 

 

 

 

Alternatively, just start proceedings; they've had more than enough warning and opertunity to refund the lot.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Dave :) I'm going to do that!!

 

Btw, you know they told me over the phone that the charges are a "deterent"? I requested the tape to be sent to my local branch. Then I got a call from a customer services manager saying they're unable to send a tape and instead, I can go into the branch and listen to the conversation over the phone.

 

Hmmm...do you reckon they know what's on the tape? Trying to avoid me have it?

 

Dan :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...