Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Morgan Stanley - Three PPI and Three interest one account !!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4387 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have the statements for a Morgan Stanley Dean Witter credit card from 2003 - 2007.

 

Each month shows they took out three separate amounts for PPI and three separate amounts for interest. I have checked with Morgan Stanley and they say Barclay's are now responsible for the account.

 

What is the best way to get this account sorted out, claim the PPI and the overcharged interest?

 

Which claim forms should I use? Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just looked at spread sheets available - should i be completing CISheet v101.xls ??

 

Should I also use this form for claiming the interest?

 

I guess this problem is a bit different to the usual claim and I am not sure about the way to go about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes areed

 

canyou scan up one of the statement showing this please:

 

as a picture[jpg] file

or convert them to .PDF

ENSURE:remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

 

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf

than many single ones

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

then hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is as per one of the statements:

 

COPY STATEMENT

ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXX

CUSTOMER NAME XXXXXXX XXXX

ADDRESS XXXXXXX

 

STMT DATE 21/05/2003 CREDIT £XXXX CASH LIMIT £ XXXX

CASH AVAIL£ XXX CREDIT AVAIL £XXXX CASH LIMIT £XXXX

MIN PAYMT £XXX PMT DUE 15/06/2003

 

12/05/2003 PAYMENT VIA BGC - THANKYOU £ 102.00

 

12/05/2003 INTEREST £24.63

 

12/05/2003 INTEREST £18.80

 

12/05/2003 INTEREST £18.99

 

12/05/2003 PAYMENT PROTECTION PLAN £15.14

 

12/05/2003 PAYMENT PROTECTION PLAN £11.59

 

12/05/2003 PAYMENT PROTECTION PLAN £ 8.81

Link to post
Share on other sites

bal for that month?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok me or ims will look at this later.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It looks like it could be three rates for three different things

 

1 Purchases i.e. normal transactions

 

2 Cash Advances

 

3 Balance transfer rate

 

Any of this ring any bells?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this was a card that I got and transferred the balance from another card

- the very first statement on 12/5/03 shows the credit limit was £5500 and current balance was £5041.51.

 

All of the monthly statements between 2003 and 2007 other than 21/7/03 look exactly the same as the example above

the only difference on the 21/07/03 statement are three cash advances totalling £500.

I had no purchases on any statement.

 

I dont understand why the very first statement (above) should show three interest and three PPI and for them to continue till 2007.

 

Having said all of the above can you advise what sort of claim I should put in and as there are three ppi how do I go about it? Sorry to be a pain but I just dont know how to approach it .... thanks Allan

Edited by AllanLyn
added more info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Right I think we can take a good stab at this.

 

If the copy statements show the rates of interest then work out what the average rate is. If the rate is shown as a monthly rate then work out the average of the monthly rate and pop that rate into this spreadsheet and it will work out the APR based on a monthly rate.

 

MonthlyToAPR.xls

 

You will need the APR to enter into the main spreadsheet which is attached below.

 

If you don't have the rates on the copy statements you are going to have to have a stab at working it out. Add up the total interest you have been charged for the month. Divide it by the total opening balance on the statement and multiply the result by 100. Make a note of that percentage figure. Do the same for a random sample of six statements and you can then work out the average rate.

 

Pop that into the spreadsheet above to give the estimated APR and use that in the main spreadsheet.

 

Use the main spreadsheet below to reconstruct the account. Follow the instructions in the sheet.

 

If the balance is split into three items, add them together to give on figure and use that where the reference in the sheet is to the balance figure.

 

Add up the total transactions for the month including PPI, Interest, cash withdrawals and anything else and use that figure as the total spend for the month.

 

Enter the amount repaid for the month.

 

Where it asks for the PPI amount, add up the three charges for PPI and enter those as one figure.

 

When complete you will have the best estimate of a reconstructed account and the potential PPI award will be shown in the spreadsheet.

 

Go along to the fos website and grab a copy of the consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Send a copy of the spreadsheet and consumer questionnaire to Barclays together with a brief letter requiring refund.

 

They will have 8 weeks to investigate and give you a final decision before you can pass it to fos to deal with.

 

FosRunningPPI v101.xls

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you can merge the PPI and use CIsheet thats for sure

or p'haps the FOSRUNNINGCI sheet.

 

as for the interests

well your PPI claim will be at the [highest] rate you can find on the statements.

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks IMX and DX

I have all the statements and a very poor copy of the application form and I think the APR reads 18.9%. I will get into this over the weekend and get the figures into the spreadsheet.

 

I will keep you informed and get back to you if I have problems.... both of you thank you so much for your time and interest in my problem.

 

AllanLyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...