Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car debt from a long time ago


Jamesf348
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

Really struggling with this one mentally so any help appreciated.

 

Back in 2004, I took a car out on finance.

In 05, lost my job and couldn't make payments.

Susequently the car was repoed in 2006.

I've had no dealings myself with company in question (Marlin financial services) or any dealings or payments made since 2005, with original creditor.

 

Suddenly started getting letters to pay the alleged debt.

Had 3 in total.

 

First 2 asking to contact for a repayment plan.

Then the third being told the case had been forwarded to their solicitor (Mortimer Clark).

 

On this, I've written a letter saying I do not acknowledge the debt as no payment or written acknowledgement has been made by me in over 6 years.

 

Just wondering if anyone else has had this sort of problem,

and if so, how they went about it.

Any advice is appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Edited by Jamesf348
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi welcome to CAG.

Ok so you have made no payment or acknowledgment

in writting since 2005??

Have you checked your credit reference files if not

you should do so asap, I think this may well be

statute barred already so be careful of how you respond

to any contact.

Your credit report will be an important indicator to the status

of the alleged debt.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Thanks for the fast reply.

Certainly no payment made by myself in over 6 years.

I have checked my credit report.

It says I defaulted in September 2006, which I cannot see how as the car was repossessed well prior to that date.

 

The bank account that was tied to the agreement was terminated at the beginning of May 2006,

so it's impossible that I made a payment to the agreement in less than 6 years.

 

I was very careful with the responding letter.

 

I found a template of notice of statute barred.

 

Began it with "I do not acknowledge any any debt to you".

At no point in the template I sent did I acknowledge it.

I sent it recorded delivery and it was signed for on Friday.

I have printed the electronic signature.

This is making me very worried and stressed and any help would be very appreciated.

 

Where will Marlin/Mortimer Clarke go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure the 2009 date is not just a file update?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Positive. The file was last updated last month. The default date is definitely registered on my account as sept 2006. Surely the default date is when I first defaulted?? Is someone playing funny buggers??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they would there is a lot of this going on at present.

A suggestion send this (you fill in the detail)

 

The Compliance Manager/ Data Controller

XXXXXX debt Collectors.

 

Ref: xxxxxxx

Dear Sir Or Madam,

I write in response to you communication dated xxxx in which

you claim that I owe a debt for xxxxx to xxxxx, Please take note

I do not acknowledge any debt to you or any company you claim

to represent.

 

Further to receiving your claim for this alleged debt my personal

research and advice given brings me to conclude that any such

alleged debt is Statute Barred, therefore I will not now or in the

future be making any payment or offer of payment now or in the

future.

You will now cease to process or store any data you hold on me

with immediate effect.

I am sure I do not have to remind you of the OFT Guidance

2003/2011 regarding the pursute of statute barred debt and

the sale of such debt without informing the purchaser of the

status of the debt.

Send Rcorded Delivery.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may respond by saying that you made a payment thus implying that it's not SB. It's not uncommon for certain companies to suggest that a phantom payment was made. However, the onus is on them to prove it by way of providing evidence of how it was paid, when & by whome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can go into my old bank and get a statement. My mother made a few small payments to the original creditor without my knowledge as we wasn't getting along at the time. My mother has looked into her bank accounts and not even she made a payment in 2006 to British Credit Trust (original creditor). My gut feeling is that Marlin are trying to pull a fast one, but can't help not worrying. Thank you all for your input so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I can go into my old bank and get a statement. My mother made a few small payments to the original creditor without my knowledge as we wasn't getting along at the time. My mother has looked into her bank accounts and not even she made a payment in 2006 to British Credit Trust (original creditor). My gut feeling is that Marlin are trying to pull a fast one, but can't help not worrying. Thank you all for your input so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok! What's the scenario with signing these "take a walk" letters? I've read horror stories of DCA's copying signatures.

I printed the SB letter.

 

I have never seen proof of any such action in many years.

if you type a series of xxxxxxs in another paler colour and sign

over that or just initial any documents

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The donation tab is just at the end of each e-mail alert page.

I thank you in anticipation on behalf of CAG

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Donation made. Thank you for your help so far.

 

Excellent thank you,

If you need any more help just yell:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right folks.

Here we go.

 

Had a letter back today.

 

Marlin have sent a statement of payments up to 2008....

Well my bank account was closed on may 2006!!!!

 

Secondly they've sent a "signed" letter of vehicle surrender!

Firstly there is no signature of mine on there.

It's my mothers.

 

Secondly, my name is printed on there of which I didn't print!

The only signatures on the letter are my mother and the bloke who took the car.

 

Regardless, my advisor at the CAB informs me that a letter of surrender isn't acknowledgement of debt anyway.

 

There's some fraud going on here...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...