Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RWay/Horwich Farrelly solicitors chasing wifes old Shop Direct debt


TheLion
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You can phone them, but I prefer to do everything in writing, so that there is a proper record. You can use the same letter to both the OFT and TS.

 

Your local council website will most likely have contact details for the local TS office - normal procedure is to write or phone them, and they pas it on to whatever office deals with the company concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm. A couple of things immediately spring to mind.

 

You do not seem to be denying your wife spent the money, therefore regardless of any legalities she (morally) owes it. Why are you looking for legal loopholes so she does not repay money she has borrowed (otherwise known as theft to take and not pay for, I believe). If I borrow money, I repay it. I was brought up that way!!

 

If you know the CCA is in her maiden name then ask for it in that name - simple really!

 

If they did not acknowledge receipt of the change of name and continued to write all this time in her maiden name, perhaps they did not receive it?

 

Would you like them to be disclosing your wife's info to other people without checking they are her? Of course not!

 

It is trying to protect her information so why not work with them rather than digging your heels in and refusing.

 

However, the only person's credit history that is going to be ruined by refusing to pay etc is your wife's so I suppose it is up to you if you want to play around rather than simply dealing with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, the only person's credit history that is going to be ruined by refusing to pay etc is your wife's so I suppose it is up to you if you want to play around rather than simply dealing with it.

 

That's it exactly, you've hit the nail on the head.

Although everyone is entitled to their own opinion on how to deal with a DCA pestering, it is ultimately entirely up to the original poster on how they want to deal with it - whether they owe the money or not.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go with another DCA troll :mad:

 

Do TS handle individual cases and would you advise contacting the FOS again?

 

Yes, TS handle individual cases. The OFT take a longer-term approach, but if they receive enough complaints about DCA then they should take action eventually.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 'bb' we will phone Consumer Direct tomorrow. As for 'Sensibly Speaking', yes I agree that you have a right to your opinion, however, it would be wise to remember this phrase:

 

"To acuse someone of being wrong, you have to be right all the time"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have sent back the consent form that the OFT sent to us. Also posting off virtually the same complaint to TS tomorrow. The phonecalls have started again, we are not speaking to the muppets. Keep getting the same woman, all she says is 'hello, hello, hello, hello...' sounds like a verbal machine gun :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent back the consent form that the OFT sent to us. Also posting off virtually the same complaint to TS tomorrow. The phonecalls have started again, we are not speaking to the muppets. Keep getting the same woman, all she says is 'hello, hello, hello, hello...' sounds like a verbal machine gun :)

 

Can you record the calls? If so, record her and play her back to herself a few times :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent off complaint to TS yesterday by recorded delivery. Received a letter from RW offering the wife a 'significant discount', if she does not call them they will initiate further action...sounds familiar. Also received two phonecalls, both from the same lady (not the verbal machine gun this time), two minutes apart and on different numbers. Did not speak to her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

 

Still getting calls from RW, atleast one per day.

 

Had phonecall from TS and this is how it went:

 

Advised by TS to change our phone number and possibly contact IC with regard to FOS possibly, in my opinion it had to be, passing on the number to RW.

 

Informed by TS that the law has changed in the last two months, obviously referring to the test cases, in that if 'documents' are produced by a creditor then the debt could possibly be enforced.

 

My reply was that, bear in mind that I wasn't expecting this topic to arise and have not read as much as I should have, the cases were only in relation to the obtaining of information, namely the 'composition' of s.77-79 requests in order to prove a debts unenforceability, if not 'complied' with. Stated that in order for RW to enforce it they would have to prove that an original, signed and therefore enforceable agreement exists as s.127(3) is a complete defence.

 

Informed by TS that s.127(3) was repealed in 2006.

 

Replied that this only applies to pre April 2007 agreements.

 

Conclusion:

 

What a waste of time. It is sad when you appear to know more than the people you are complaining to...what hope do you have? I'm just a novice at this stuff, I would hate to think the problems that someone who knows nothing would have...probably be on the phone to RW making deals with regard to the sale of body parts in order to clear the balance.

 

Next step I guess is to change the number then wait out and see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Update.

 

Well we changed our number back in March to end the call barrage from RW. All was quiet until today when we received a 'Formal Demand for Payment'. Once again they are requesting full payment within 10 days or they will take court action. They state that their 'client' has authorised them to, strange when they own the debt. So much for the OFT & TS doing anything, seems like they are free to do what they want :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Times are hard for RobWay

You dont often get help from OFT or TS so give the Robbers the run around all by yourself.

Send letter after letter to them, make things up like you have been told this and that by their client you know the type of thing.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update:

 

Wife received another letter from Robingscum's in-house solicitor Horwich Farrelly.

 

Once again in her maiden name; stating that they have been instructed to commence court action... unless she pays in full or contacts them as to why she cannot within the next ten days.

 

Would report it, though after the experience of post 40 we feel that TS & OFT are about as much use a choclate teapot. Any advice?

 

Oh, I managed to get confirmation from the FOS that they do pass on contact details to the company that you are complaining about.

 

Guess that would explain all the phonecalls that we received and that forced us to change our number.

Edited by TheLion
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just compared the last letter to one that was received in December 2009, and they're virtually the same. Guess this must be the work of their threat-o-matic computer again. Oh well, another letter for the growing pile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Just received another letter demanding payment.

 

The last conversation that we had with them they stated that the balance is zero and no-one will be chasing for it.

 

I even recorded it.

 

First I phoned RW and recorded it:

 

They state that the alleged account is still owed by my wife.

 

They deny that a CCA request was made in 2009 and that it is unfilled and therefore in default.

 

State that catalogue debts are not bound by the CCA 1974 as they are mail order.

 

I then phoned Kays (Shopdirect) and gave them the account number that RW state on their letters.

 

The lad from Kays stated that there is an account for that number but it does not exist in either my wife's married or maiden (the name that RW are chasing) names.

 

Phoned RW again and managed to speak to the cretin who I last spoke to.

 

Informed him of what Kays had stated and he completely ignored it.

 

He then stated that RW are going to be sending out a compliant CCA in my wife's name along with statements.

 

What a bunch of ignorant a*****s!!!! The only way they can do the above is to fabricate the evidence.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri

 

whats the golden CAG rule????????

 

 

NEVER EVER phone a fleecing DCA

 

they will say ANYTHING to get money out of people

for debts THEY DO NOT OWE!!!!!!!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have been advised by the local TS to write a complaint to them and warn them under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. We have also informed RW in the letter that we will be making complaints, once again, to TS and the OFT.

 

42man. How do you press for harassment if they continue to do so when you have warned them?

 

Yeah, sorry dx100uk. I have been really stressed lately, what with ill health and other issues, and I couldn't help myself. They are not going to get a penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...