Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Isas already allow you to earn tax-free interest on up to £20,000 each tax year. But under recent reforms, they are now supposed to be more flexible.View the full article
    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sacked for misconduct (will appeal)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4343 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok sacked for misconduct - i have a few questions:-

 

1. The letter in which I was informed of the decision to dismiss me with the effect of the date of the letter was not officially signed by anyone from the company I worked for - does this mean it does not stand as its not signed?

 

2. reasons for dismissal are not sufficient for gross misconduct - no prior warnings etc -

reasons by company given were - failure to carry out management instruction and gross insubordination.

I worked for a haulage company who requested I picked aload up from 2 places - I was only able to pick up one in my working day - every wednesday I pick up my daughter and was not able to work overtime for which management new i am unable to as this has been the case for 6 months and I had already completed 1 hrs OT before shift start.

 

Do I have a good case for unfair dismissal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you worked there?

 

On the day in question, did you inform the employer when they asked you to drop two loads that you would not be able to do so?

 

As far as I am aware, whether the letter is signed or not is largely irrelevant - you could point it out to them but they would probably just reprint and sign it!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ty for reply - I have worked with the company 4 years and on the day in question I had not informed him in the morning but as this has been the case for 6 months and have not been required to inform him as i had previously informed him every wednesday i am unable to work over time at the end of my shift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry also - i am required to do a reasonable amount of overtime as long as i have recieved reasonable notice - I had already worked 14.5hrs by the wednesday. There are some other deeper issues with regards to contract also which i will have to discuss with CAB as our contracts have not been updated or signed by me since payscales have changed 2 times negatively and 1 time positively but still less money than the original contract i signed 4 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mate

 

Have you ever sat down together and discussed this in a review or better yet put it down on paper?

 

Tom

 

only discussed verbally with manager to inform him of my requirement on the wednesday of which he had no issues with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think before any consideration of Unfair Dismissal you need to go through the formality of an appeal against your dismissal. This needs to be constructed around the fact that you had an agreement with your employer that you were not required to work overtime on a Wednesday due to childcare commitments. This agreement had been in place for six months without any complaint by the employer and you had not been notified that the agreement was under review or had been revoked in any way.

 

You should also stress that in your four years of service you have never been insubordinate, nor refused any reasonable request to carry out extra duties and that the employer's actions in dismissing without warning are, you feel, unfair in the circumstances.

 

This may work, but there are no guarantees. You will notice that I use the word 'agreement' and this is the seed that you need to plant. If this were to have been a formal flexible working arrangement to allow you to care for a child, then you would be on stronger ground, but with only an informal, verbal, agreement this is harder, and it is entirely possible that the employer would be entitled to dismiss for the grounds stated in the absence of a specific conversation about the workload on that particular day.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right ok, so you have been employed for 4 years with them, but 6 months ago, you made them aware that you need flexibility around your shifts and in return you would work overtime?

 

There is always an argument of an 'Oral Agreement' in a case like this however it can sometimes be very hard to prove.

 

Is there a possibility to get a copy of your last 6 months or as much as possible of your work rota's? because this would show that the Employer has acknowledged the need to help you and has adjusted there rostering around your child care needs

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may work, but there are no guarantees. You will notice that I use the word 'agreement' and this is the seed that you need to plant. If this were to have been a formal flexible working arrangement to allow you to care for a child, then you would be on stronger ground, but with only an informal, verbal, agreement this is harder, and it is entirely possible that the employer would be entitled to dismiss for the grounds stated in the absence of a specific conversation about the workload on that particular day.

 

the quote in red - sorry I had informed my manager that to pick up from the second location would incurr overtime of which I was unable todo due to childcare.

 

thanks for the reply sideinder I will use this as my main defence in the appeal - I should have gone to spec savers and got a formal written agreement. but at the time my manager had not indicated there would be a requirement for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right ok, so you have been employed for 4 years with them, but 6 months ago, you made them aware that you need flexibility around your shifts and in return you would work overtime?

 

There is always an argument of an 'Oral Agreement' in a case like this however it can sometimes be very hard to prove.

 

Is there a possibility to get a copy of your last 6 months or as much as possible of your work rota's? because this would show that the Employer has acknowledged the need to help you and has adjusted there rostering around your child care needs

 

the overtime was already a requirement not a bargaining tool - we only had a clocking in system installed 3 months ago so i could request this data for the appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes definitely get the data for that, because that would be a great for you to have, So your able to question them on why for 3 months they hadn't a problem with it but all of a sudden you do 1 thing 'apparently wrong' and they think they have grounds to dismiss you straight away, its laughable.

 

Like Sidewinder says appeal the decision first and when you get a chance to, talk to them face to face re illiterate to them your position argument, and then they may reconsider there stupid mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems a very over the top response by your employer - perhaps it might have more to do with how important the customer is to your employer (that you had to pick up the second load from) than you yourself. Is there any chance of your employer cooling off and discussing reinstatement? Erm, might be worth 'googling' about explicit and implicit terms of employment which might help clarify things a bit for you - in that your contract of imployment isn'y just what is always just what is written down in your contract (explicit terms). There may be implicit understandings as well - perhaps what we used to call 'custom and practise'? (I'm no legal expert by the way - but there are certain informal agreements/work patterns that employers can't simply ignore if things go pear-shaped at a later date in the employment relationship). Are there any trade unions you can refer the matter to?

 

I know at this point in time your may be furious - but do be careful (in the heat of the moment) what you may say to your employer or put in writing right now.

 

All the bast

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...