Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning guys, I would appear I have more people chasing me than first listed. Apologies for this but I had a Very account for £2292.20 that was sold onto Lowell and Overdales, who sent me a PAPLOC request earlier in the year which I replied with all the usual, sent off CCA request etc. They responded on 07/03/34 with the attached. I guess i forgot to list this here nearer the time, They have sent me another PAPLOC request.  Could you please give me your thoughts on what they replied with previously and what I should do next? img049new.pdf
    • What does the date refer to please? HB
    • 16/10/2023   They feel like the no win no fee solicitors that cant ever help you when you have a clear cut negligence claim
    • Thats the last we heard from them. Can't help but get the feeling they are not there to protect us at all.
    • Dear Mrs Thank you for your complaint about Parkingeye Limited (‘Parkingeye’).  Please accept our apologies for the delay in responding to you, we’ve received a large volume of correspondence in recent months.   At the time you submitted your complaint to us, we understand you were concerned you hadn’t received a response to your subject access request (‘SAR’).   What we do Part of our role is to consider complaints from individuals who believe that there has been an infringement of the data protection law. The Data Protection Act 2018 requires us to investigate a complaint to the extent we feel is appropriate and to inform you of the outcome.     Next   Hopefully you may have received a response from Parkingeye, however if you haven’t received a response and you wish us to consider this further, please let us know within two weeks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

IR ESA and income


rachmac83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Hoping someone can explain this to me as im quite confused.

 

I recently posted about OH loosing his job and we are putting in a couple claim for ESA IR

im currently on CB ESA in the SG

 

we have decided that it is too much for OH to work full time and care for me, i need him to be there more, so have decided part time is the way to go so we will prob stay on IR ESA for a while.

 

my question is how does deductions for his income work, whats the disregard as he is the one working and im the main ESA claimant.

 

cos im entitled to CB ESA will they deduct anything lower than that for the income, for example

 

current rate is around 160pw

gets a job paying 70pw

will the ESA reduce to 90 (not taking into account any disregard)

Or will it get reduced to the CB rate of 105pw and left at that.

 

also should he decided to work full time at some point can i revert back to CB ESA or will i no longer be eligible cos i haven't worked for the last few years?

 

so confused, please help?

thanks

rach

The whole world is made of faith, trust and pixie dust :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...