Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

National Clamps, parked in neighbor's space and clamped, advice please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I posted this in pepipoo but I know some of you don't go there so it's good to get second opinions, here's what I posted:

 

I don’t know where to start, it’s a bit lengthy to outline the whole situation so I’ll give you the basics and then go on to details and a few interesting bits afterwards. Please have patents with me on this as I really need some help.

 

The simple version:

Parked in one of my neighbour’s spaces which is adjacent to mine, that was taken up by the visiting landlady at the time. I Come back to my space 30-35 minutes later and it’s been clamped which I had to pay £80 to get released.

 

Now the details:

 

Were I live we have three blocks of flats that has its own gated car park shared by all three on site. We have our car park looked after by National Clamps and we are each given a permit to put on display that has a serial number corresponding to our allocated space, it’s. Each space is numbered according to you flat number.

 

As I mentioned, my space was occupied by the landlady who owns the space, so I thought it was fair enough if I just parked up in the space next to mine for 30 minutes while I pop in to get ready for work. It was the middle of the day so obviously, by neighbour is out at work and their space was empty, as are most of the spaces at that time of day.

The landlady left and 10 minutes later when I get to my car and realise it was clamped, I asked the clamper why this has happened even though I had a permit. He said he realised and checked back with his office to make sure and when they got back to him they told him to go ahead because I was in the wrong space.

 

I phoned up the company and they wouldn’t listen to reason and kept saying the same thing that I ‘was in the wrong space’. The woman on the phone was very unhelpful to say the least and was acting like a child... but I’ll get on to that later.

So in a need to get to work quickly I paid up and the clamper gave me the relevant information to appeal.

So here I am, asking for advice since I want to contest this. You see the square we live only has a limited number of spaces compared to the number of flats and in the first couple of years before I lived there, they had problems with people parking anywhere they wanted, ones who didn’t even own a space. So after trying different ways of getting it to work properly like numbering the spaces to the flat, the resident’s association eventually decided to get a parking control company and National Clamps to help the problem. This is paid for with an increase in our annual service charge to the management company which pays National Clamps.

 

A few interesting things to mention, about a month ago the management came to the complex and did some maintenance on site, when the left they tore down the parking instruction and clamping signs form the lamp posts so we had no indication there was any parking enforcement in operation, I will post the pictures below. Furthermore, each year we are given a new permit with a few visitor permits to display which has the year printed on it. This year of 2012 they have failed to do so. As a side, some residents with garages who can’t be bothered lock up every time they use their car quite often park outside their spaces on a junction in our car park and it’s been quite obvious that there has been a lack of parking enforcement the past 18 months or so.

 

I’m thinking with these combined, it’s reasonable to appeal on these grounds that there is no indication any sort of clamping is in force.

 

I’m hoping to speak to my neighbour tonight, she doesn’t live in my block but the one next to it. I was thinking of putting a note on her car or in her post box and just asking if she could put something in writing to say she made no complaint and we are quite liberal with each others spaces should ours be used up and they are empty . After all, I have no idea if her or someone in her flat made a complaint, but that would make no sense, she’s seen my car every day for the past 3 years, I’m sure she knows it’s me in her space and for some reason I was just using hers quickly, we’ve all done it before in our square. I’m wondering if the clamper man just got embarrassed when I asked how did he know to come down here and clamp me so quick and he just said his office told him to check my car specifically.

 

The way it is supposed to be is that we as residents, get NC to work for us. If we decide between us to move a spot or use a space for 10 minutes or an hour and no complaint by the owner has been made, then I don’t fully understand the logic. When they first started working in our square, there were a couple of instances when a visitor was clamped but the residents had a word with them, letting them know works going on and it all was sorted out. Today, it seemed as if they didn’t want to know. When I spoke to the woman on the phone, I asked if it wasn’t obvious I was a paying resident, I have a permit, although not for the space it is for A space, it’s not like I’m someone off the street using someone else’s car park, if my neighbour was to come back she could have used my space. At which point the woman started laughing, which as you can guess, is a bit of a numpty thing to do. I then asked, since my neighbour’s space used up by my clamped car, if she was to use mine would she get clamped then? To which I got a very smug ‘yeah...and?’

 

It’s like these people go with the letters of an agreement without thinking of the philosophy behind it. No understanding, no intuition or common sense... I feel like I’ve ranted too much.

 

One thing I forgot to mention in the beginning, the landlady is my mother, I rent the place off her with my girlfriend, so there’s no point going down the route of passing it all on to the flat owner to sort out.

 

So I was thinking the part about no signage. I was under the impression that there is a requirement for there to be a sign x amount of distance between the land and the post?

 

Thoughts on actions I could/should take (if any) very welcome, thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replys.

 

@sailor sam: As I said, the person who parked in my space was the owner/landlady of the property , who is in fact my mother. She had left by the time the clamper showed up. I was in the other space no longer then 30minutes.

 

Also, I'm not the sort of person trying to get people clamped and expecting others to be, that's not why I'm here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replys.

 

@sailor sam: As I said, the person who parked in my space was the owner/landlady of the property , who is in fact my mother. She had left by the time the clamper showed up. I was in the other space no longer then 30minutes.

 

Also, I'm not the sort of person trying to get people clamped and expecting others to be, that's not why I'm here.

 

I wasn't suggesting that you were. What I was getting at is that as your space was occupied by the landlord, then they to should of been clamped also. If however they wern't clamped because that they were simply the landlord, then that should mean you shouldn't have been either. Now I've cleared that up, why can't the landlord (your mother) who indirectly caused you to get clamped, explain to the clamping firm what happened and get you a refund? As she is the landlord, surely she carries some clout here?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Not sure if i am posting this in the right place new on here but we are having the same problems on our estate, agroup of residents have formed a limited company and have decided they are going to control the parking on our estate, eg. getting cars towed,clamped if parked in wrong place, and also saying comercial vehicles are not allowed on site during the hours of 12 am - 5am. Are these people legally allowed to do this, i cant believe a bunch of residents can tell all the other residents how to park?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if i am posting this in the right place new on here but we are having the same problems on our estate, agroup of residents have formed a limited company and have decided they are going to control the parking on our estate, eg. getting cars towed,clamped if parked in wrong place, and also saying comercial vehicles are not allowed on site during the hours of 12 am - 5am. Are these people legally allowed to do this, i cant believe a bunch of residents can tell all the other residents how to park?

 

i'd start a new thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...