Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Co op unpaid item fee


Ilikecake
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone cane help with this please:-

My partner just got charged £15 by Co op, because Talk Talk tried to take some money out, there wasn't enough, so he got slapped with an unpaid item fee. Now he had already paid last month's Talk Talk bill, and they dipped in a second time to take some money out, they said, because of the bank holiday, which isn't until next week, so I know, we have an issue with Talk Talk that we must take up, but can I legally request that Co op refund my partner the charges? Would I need to follow the usual route of writing them a letter, then if that's no good, taking it to the ombudsman, or is this different? Any help greatly appreciated, thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to check TTs terms and conditions on payments

if the due date fall on a weekend most contracts will specify

that the payment will be taken on the nearest working day

after the due date,.

Checked mine for this info.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you make formal complaints to

the Co Op and to TT it is unreasonable to take

a payment so much earlier than the due date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply, I will. If the co op refuse after the first letter, what's the general procedure with a bank, does anyone know? Is is worth chasing it? To be honest, they shouldn't be allowing companies to take unchecked payments out of bank a/cs, esp. if they see that the company has already taken payment that month...?? Would there be something about this in the DD agreement??

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact is it is all automated yes take a read of the DD ''guarantee''

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The error is nothing to do with the Co-op.

 

The originator (Talk Talk) have requested the money. The Co-op tried and failed to make the payment for you. The issue lies with Talk Talk. If there's a dispute, ring Talk Talk, tell them you've been charged by your bank and they must refund the charge. If Talk Talk are at fault, they should do it.

 

If they won't and they're not at fault (i.e. they notified you of a change to the payment date) then Co-op only has to offer a gesture of goodwill refund. If your account has been running fine and/or you've had no previous refunds, they should offer half if not all of the charges back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...