Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interview Under Caution


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

His skin condition is visible and he could wear clothing that would make it even more so. We have a further meeting with the solicitor on tuesday so I am going to ask him them what his thoughts are on this as it seems very strange when I have looked at other posts by other people there has been evidence of some sort or other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Some people are incredibly spiteful and vindictive. Personally, I tell no-one irl that I am on any benefits at all, don't trust anyone in case they get jealous and decide I shouldn't be and cause trouble. Keep schtum I would. Hope it all goes ok charliesgranny, sounds like it will thankfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, can I ask another question? If they decide to suspend his dla on thursday what will happen with the car? He will be unable to get to work if they take that away as its 2 hours by public transport each way and he will be unable to walk by the time he gets there if he has been travelling that long. Our gp wanted to go straight on the sick but he is still going into work at the min.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, can I ask another question? If they decide to suspend his dla on thursday what will happen with the car? He will be unable to get to work if they take that away as its 2 hours by public transport each way and he will be unable to walk by the time he gets there if he has been travelling that long. Our gp wanted to go straight on the sick but he is still going into work at the min.

 

Hi,

 

If DLA is suspended (specifically the HRM component, or both components), then unfortunately the car will go too, but not necessarily straight away. There will be a grace period of anything between a couple of weeks to a couple of months. During this period, no further overpayment should be incurred - Motability themselves incur the financial loss of providing the car beyond DLA suspension, and not the DWP. If your son joined the Motability scheme at any time in the future, he'd likely owe them a bit of money (£50.00 for every week that his car was kept beyond his DLA suspension) to be repaid before they'd provide another car. However, if he doesn't (or can't) rejoin the scheme, Motability won't actually chase him for this money.

 

It's entirely possible that DLA could be suspended, but reinstated so quickly that the car doesn't even go.

 

It's also possible that the car goes, but comes back upon successful DLA reinstatement.

 

It's also possible that DLA isn't suspended at all, and this would of course be the best outcome :)

 

In any case, it is unfortunately entirely possible that your son will lose his car. Hopefully it won't come to that, but he should be prepared for its loss in the near-ish future, as a worst case scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add as well - not that it actually makes much difference - if the car is taken, it will be collected by Motability themselves, rather than the DWP. They're not there to judge as to the circumstances under which entitlement to the car has been lost, they're just there to collect the car. It should be a very civil affair, and your son will be notified of an appointment well in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your reply I have shown him this so he is prepared if it comes to this.

 

I know someone whose car was taken 3 months to the day after suspension. They were given about 2 1/2 months' notice, and also had the option of returning the car themselves as soon as they wanted (they didn't). The Motability representative who came to collect the car was very sympathetic, not that it helped much...!

 

In this instance, the car was taken before a decison was made as to whether or not DLA was to continue, or completely stop. As it happens, their DLA was completely stopped, so the car didn't come back, but if the decision had been favourable, the car could have come back within a couple of weeks of its collection, as this is when their DLA decision was made. Presumably it wouldn't have been the same car, it probably would have been a new lease agreement, but I don't know, since it didn't turn out that way...

 

Officially, they owe Motability about £650, but this is only payable if they ever lease a car from Motability in the future. Also, they got part of their deposit back (it was quite a fancy car, so they'd had to pay several hundred upfront for it).

 

I've also read online about people who have been given much less notice than this, and their cars have been taken within a couple of weeks of suspension, so there doesn't seem to be any hard and fast rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has read your reply so he will be prepared for what will be. He has to go back to see the gp on tuesday and also the solicitor but even though he has always been a very timid person I have never seen him in the state he is in at the min so the gp is going to give him something to help keep him calm during the interview.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has read your reply so he will be prepared for what will be. He has to go back to see the gp on tuesday and also the solicitor but even though he has always been a very timid person I have never seen him in the state he is in at the min so the gp is going to give him something to help keep him calm during the interview.

 

 

That's a good idea. I'm a complete wooss with all things like this & took a couple of diazapam before my IUC. I go to pieces with doctors appointments & dentists let alone something like this. Those 2 pills made all the difference. Haven't taken any since, that was over a year ago, they literally are a quick fix. I wonder if they will give him something like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good idea. I'm a complete wooss with all things like this & took a couple of diazapam before my IUC. I go to pieces with doctors appointments & dentists let alone something like this. Those 2 pills made all the difference. Haven't taken any since, that was over a year ago, they literally are a quick fix. I wonder if they will give him something like that.

 

Hi, he has seen the doctor and he has given him tablets to help get through thursday he also offered diazapam just for thursday so this should help. Its a disgrace that so many people are put through this kind of thing and the stress makes their conditions worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well just got back from solicitors and they are still saying they have no evidence so its just waiting till thursday now, I will let you all know how it goes and once again thankyou all for the good wishes

 

I take it the solicitor will be able to charge more if they attend the IUC then? :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well interview over, some kind person who works with him has said he walks from his car to the office door without pain and they even provided a short video recording of him walking the 10metres. The ladies who conducted the interview said that he cannot be disabled when he has such a good work record and does not take time off, as if he suffered pain he would need to be on the sick all the time. They have said it will be up to three months before he finds out what they intend to do and that they would be looking at an extremly large amount of money if they decide to claim it back from him. Now I don`t know if this is just to try and scare him thinking that they want vast amounts off him but telling him he cant be disabled because he doesnt take time off work is out of order. I have sent an email to our mp as reccommended by DIAL and Disability Alliance. So I suppose we will have to see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG thats appalling imo. And what a nasty bitter little piece of work this person sounds who reported him.

 

Now I don`t know if this is just to try and scare him thinking that they want vast amounts off him but telling him he cant be disabled because he doesnt take time off work is out of order. I have sent an email to our mp as reccommended by DIAL and Disability Alliance. So I suppose we will have to see what happens next.

 

Exactly. Complain to everyone you can get your hands on and keep complaining. This is outrageous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no law saying that in order to get HRM DLA, you can't walk at all. Videos don't show pain or discomfort.

 

but telling him he cant be disabled because he doesnt take time off work is out of order.

 

It makes no sense to me at all. My dad is classed as disabled, yet, aside from his ex-boss telling him not to come in until his GP says so, he's never had time off for disability related stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this person obviously thinks they know more than gp`s and specialists do who all provided letters for today. Also his managers at work had provided statments but this one person has caused so much stress and can remain anonymous

Link to post
Share on other sites

He does not use aids as due to his hand deformaties he cannot hold them but, there rails which he leans on and this is shown on the video. I am so angry as there is not one person in that office who want to swap places with him and take the pain he suffers day after day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this person obviously thinks they know more than gp`s and specialists do who all provided letters for today. Also his managers at work had provided statments but this one person has caused so much stress and can remain anonymous

 

As I said thats disgusting. I mean what kind of nasty bitter little sod does something like this eh? Also due to the climate of hate this governments whipping up is it any wonder some disabled people get, well I would call it attacked really.

 

And yes, they're rather listen to one anonymous sod then as you say his GP and other co workers. I hope this bastard rots in hell for all the distress they've caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what a nasty piece of work that person is, it's all about jealousy, they are small minded people out there, it's probably because he has a nice car, and people think it's free when it's not you give up your mobility part of the DLA, I don't think a lot of people know that. It's a pity you can't find out who it is, and ask them to walk a week in your sons shoes, with the pain and everything that goes with it. It makes my blood boil. I hope everything works out for your son, and wish him all the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...