Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Complaining when harassed by a DCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started receiving letters from a DCA, saying I hadn't kept up with my agreed repayment plan and that I had to phone them, etc.

 

I replied, saying that on the contrary, I HAD kept to the plan and that I viewed their correspondence as personally distressing and invoiced them for distress caused, plus costs.

 

They refused to pay the invoice and still denied I had a repayment plan. As luck would have it, their printer monkeys (just the next day) wrote, saying,

 

"Dear Halibutt,

 

Thank you for maintaining payments in accordance with your agreed arrangement. The arrangement period is due to expire within 30 days (of xx/xx/xx) and we require new proposals from you to repay the balance remaining on your account.”

 

 

So, the reason I'm posting this is to show that it is possible to get results and give an example of the way I went about it - for anyone else wishing to take action in similar circumstances, the following is the last letter I wrote to them:

 

 

By Royal Mail Recorded Delivery

 

 

Dear Mr xxxxxxx,

 

Account Number: 123456789

 

I refer to your letter, dated xx/xx/xx and your erroneous assertion that I currently have no current agreed repayment plan with your company regarding the above account.

I quote directly from the letter received from Mr. xxxxxxx, Manager, (DCA), dated xx/xx/xx (copy enclosed for your convenience) which very clearly states:

 

“Thank you for maintaining payments in accordance with your agreed arrangement.

The arrangement period is due to expire within 30 days (of xx/xx/xx) and we require new proposals from you to repay the balance remaining on your account.”

 

Accordingly, I reiterate my assertion that either your company has failed in your written commitment to adequately monitor the above account as assured by Mr. xxxxxx in his letter of xx/xx/xx, or that you are following a deliberately vexatious course of action, disregarding my best and honest attempts to maintain my repayment plan as agreed, in direct contravention of OFT and FSO guidelines. Your letter of xx/xx/xx suggests the latter.

 

I also note your current reluctance to reconcile the invoice included in my letter of xx/xx/xx, detailing my genuine claim for undue personal distress, plus expenses incurred due to formulating and sending responses to your erroneous and unnecessarily distressing correspondence.

 

I trust that in light of your company’s previous correspondence and Mr. xxxxxx’s subsequent letter, that you will acknowledge that you have failed in your duty to fulfil your obligations in this matter under current regulation and regulatory bodies’ guidelines.

 

As a result of this, the amount outstanding from my previous invoice, in addition to charges for this letter and the enclosed documents is now £xx.xx

 

A full breakdown of the above amount is clearly set out in the enclosed invoice and accordingly, I will expect your remittance by cheque(s) to the above address within the time limits outlined.

 

As previously advised, any further correspondence necessitated in this matter that is not directly in relation to reasonable repayment arrangement requests or agreements, excepting any request(s) for a receipt for your remittance(s) for the enclosed invoice(s), will be charged at similar rates.

 

As a gesture of goodwill, no interest will be charged on the amount(s) outstanding, however, I reserve the right to add charges for late payments at a rate of £12 per invoice per 28 day period, in the unfortunate event that this should become necessary due to non-payment.

 

I would, of course, prefer to settle this situation amicably, but reserve the right to take this matter further with the OFT, Trading Standards, FOS and possible Small Claims Court action, submitting all relevant correspondence and proof of expenses, as may be necessary in the prosecution of a claim.

 

I will be responding appropriately to Mr. xxxxxx within the timescale he outlines in his letter of xx/xx/xx, to agree the continuance of a mutually satisfactory repayment plan.

 

Yours sincerely,

Halibutt

 

 

Invoice For Amounts Owed

 

RE: Account Number 123456789

 

 

xx/xx/xx - Remittance due by xx/xx/xx

 

Compensation for undue distress/time taken to formulate response/compose reply

@ £25 per hour - 1 hour, xx/xx/xx

 

£25.00

 

 

Postage cost - Royal Mail Recorded Delivery x 1

£01.35

 

 

Printing cost per A4 sheet x 2 @ 15p per sheet

£00.30

 

 

Photocopying costs per A4 sheet x 2 @ 10p per sheet

£00.20

 

 

Total:

£26.85

 

 

 

xx/xx/xx - Remittance due by xx/xx/xx

 

Compensation for undue distress/time taken to formulate response/compose reply

@ £25 per hour - 2 hours, xx/xx/xx

 

£50.00

 

 

Postage cost - Royal Mail Recorded Delivery x 1

£01.35

 

 

Printing cost per A4 sheet x 3 @ 15p per sheet

£00.45

 

 

Photocopying costs per A4 sheet x 2 @ 10p per sheet

£00.20

 

 

Total:

£52.00

 

 

 

 

 

Current Amount Owed:

 

 

£78.85

 

 

Your remittance(s) should be forwarded by cheque(s) made payable to Halibutt at the above address, by the “due by” dates stated.

 

Please note that I reserve the right to add a late payment fee of £12 per 28 day period per invoice at my discretion.

 

Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

 

I look forward to your timely settlement of this invoice.

 

 

Halibutt

 

 

The response was an apology and a cheque for £50 as a "good will gesture".

 

 

So, a reasonably worded complaint, backed up with irrefutable evidence can sometimes get results, even from DCAs.

I've not identified the DCA involved - simply because they actually did resolve the matter to my satisfaction, especially considering that I'm paying £1 a month, so they've covered my next four years' payments - should I still find myself in difficulties (I hope not).

 

Anyway, I hope this post might help anyone dealing with less scrupulous DCAs.

 

H. x

Edited by Halibutt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers guys. I think it's worth highlighting that I claimed for "Undue distress" as advised in a previous CAG thread, where the judge suggested that it would be the best way forward in a compensation claim, rather than emphasising costs.

 

So thanks to the original CAG poster (sorry, can't remember who that was now).

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Could do Sillygirl, put I didn't want to push it. However, just had another printer-monkey letter from them saying "No agreement, blah blah" though they signed for my letter proposing repayments over a month ago and still haven't replied.

I feel another letter and invoice coming on.

 

If they don't get this sorted out as they've promised (in writing) on two occasions now, then I WILL be taking them to Small Claims Court.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It's a DCA working under the umbrella of iDem Servicing - a company that a few of us highlighted earlier this year when they took over Arden Credit Management.

 

They don't seem to be particularly organised and, as with many DCAs that I've had dealings with, they tend to send out computer generated letters as a matter of course, rather than examining the current state of the account/alleged debt owed.

 

As many advise here, if you DO wish to contact them by letter to resolve any problems, it's best to address the letter to a specific person. In these cases, I always send correspondence by Recorded Delivery, though you can simply request proof of posting from the post office.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm new to this site but registered after googling Arden to find out if other people had been having trouble with them, and to share my story and what I'm doing.

 

I had an arrangement with them (originally Mint loans) to make affordable repayments of £40 per month for 6 months. As soon as six months passed, I was contacted by phone demanding a review of my circumstances to see if the payments could be increased. I said everything was the same and I would continue to make the payments as before, and send out an updated (but very similar) income/expenditure statement because I didnt have all those details in my head, naturally.

 

From then on every day for about 10 days I got inundated wit phone calls asking for the same information, an average of 10 calls per day. I kept saying the information had been posted, but the calls still came. One staff member asked for a £10 'Holding Fee' which would stop the calls for a time, until my information was processed, and stupidly I paid this fee. I was told later this would not stop the calls.

 

Eventually the calls did stop, but only after telling them I was going to report them to the police for harrassment. I complained to Arden in writing about my treatment, and the holding fee - and had no reply at all.

 

After no reply to my written complaints after 8 weeks had passed, (and researching using internet!) I wrote to both the FSA and the OFT to complain about Arden. The FSA have just wrote back saying there is an approx. wait of 8 weeks till I hear from them again due to a large number of complaints. The office of fair trading do not investigate individual complaints, but do look into whether companies are fit an proper to hold a credit licence. So my complaint is now on their files and if there are several complaints they may investigate further.

 

That's basically my story so far. I would urge others in the same boat as me to complain in writing and hopefully get this disgraceful company closed down.

 

please start a new thread

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tvd has his own thread now. For anyone able to assist, please click on the link below.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?358710-tvd-v-Arden

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt think the FSA investigated individual complaints either ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt think the FSA investigated individual complaints either ?

 

The meant the FOS. The FSA will not in 99.9% of cases investigate any individual complaints. But I believe that there are instances where they will, if the complaint is of a very serious nature. I presume that there will be cases where the FSA would have no choice, if they are supplied with evidence of serious breaches of regulatory rules.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been doing that Halibut with all mine for any correspondence needed. Only had one payment from Fred's/Argoose when they sent me someone else's CCA / Application form...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At least it keep's them on there toes. Oh and as Sandanter would not refund me PPI for me Debenhams card I did the calculation and deducted it from me total, paid the balance off. They write now and again threatening all sorts but as I say, see you in court oh and £12. + the bit's and peices for paper stamp etc.... Might increase mine though to £25 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! at the moment they owe me.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done but the next letter will probably state that they understand that your financial situation has improved so they are cancelling the agreed payment plan and could you please phone to arrange a new one :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...