Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello!

 

This is a question about Compound Interest & Restituionary Damages, I've read up on them but there's a couple of things I'm not sure about.

 

I want to query them using a PPI reclaim on a credit card as an example.

 

This is going to be long-winded but I wanted to explain things in as much detail as possible, as I said I've looked through this forum at length

and through some FSA stuff online as well as other reading material but couldn't find a definite answer on how Compound Interest and Restitutionary Damages

relate to one another or how RD is calculated.

 

Ok, here goes...

 

So I understand that I can claim back my PPI premiums and I can calculate Compound Interest and claim that back as well

(I also understand that if I were to go to court I can then add 8% stat int. on top and then claim that back as well but for now if we just assume I'm not going to court.)

 

I think I'm right in saying that to calculate my claim with compound interest I just work out what my individual premiums were,

find out what the APR I was paying for purchases through my lender and use those figures to calculate my claim.

 

e.g. To keep things simple lets say I make 10 payments to my credit card from 01/01/11 - 01/10/11 (APR of 20%) and the PPI premium is £10,

I have paid £100 I shouldn't have so I'm entitled to that plus the 20% APR so my claim is for £120.

 

This I where I get slightly confused as to Restituionary Damages as I thought that it was, in essence the same as compund interest.

 

But if Restitutionary Damages is essentially claiming back the unjust profit that the lender has made with my money

then can I claim back Compound Interest AND Restitutionary Damges as the money claimed back on the CI is mine anyway,

it is just the premium I paid and the insurance on the premium that I paid.

 

It is completely separate to the profit that the bank has made by lending out the money that I shouldn't have paid but did.

 

I also read that when claiming Compound Interest the start and end dates of the calculation are in line with your first and last premium paid,

 

but with Restitutionary Damages the start date is the date of your first premium and the end date is 'today's date'

as the lender is still making a profit from the money it took off you by continuing to lend it out.

 

So how do I calculate RD and is it in addition to CI???

 

I've established I paid £12 per month wrongfully for 10 months hence a CI claim of £120 but assuming today is 1/4/12 then the bank has had my money for 15 months, so am I claiming 10 months of CI with 5 months of RD on top or am I claiming 10 months of CI plus 15 months of RD??

 

And if RD is reclaiming JUST the profit the lender has made with my money

is that caluclated at the same APR i paid?

e.g The lender used the £12 it took off me in month 1 and lent it out at 20% so the profit on that is £2.40 per month for 15 months which = £36.

 

Then in month 2 it did the same for 14 months which = £33.60.

 

In month 3 it did the for 13 months which = £31.20. etc.

 

So is that then calculated all the way up to the 1/10/11 when I made my last payment and the lender made £2.40 profit on that for 5 months which = £12.

 

So, assuming thats what RD is I would then add up all those figures together to work out what the profit is that the lender made by lending out my £12

to other people at the same APR that I paid (Note that I'm not factoring in the £12 as I'm aware that those premiums are already getting claimed back on the CI side,

I'm just attempting to calculate the profit made by the bank on the premiums I paid).

 

All those figures when added together total £288, so would my claim be £120 for Compound Interest PLUS £288 in Restitutionary Damages?????

 

Also can I only claim back RD if I were to go court?? Or if I went to court could I claim back £120 (CI) + £288 (RD) = £408 * 8% stat int = £440.64???!!!

 

I do realise that I have turned a £120 claim into a £440 one which sounds ridiculous but this is just a hypothetical situation, the above is just the conclusion I have come to regarding the info I have read on CI and RD and I am keen to finds out what the facts on the matter are. I have potential claims but I am keen to get a complete understanding on the matter first, one thing I've learned from this website: Knowledge is Power.

 

Many thanks to anyone who replies, it will be a great help to me and anyone else who reads this post.

 

Regards,

 

ESG

 

 

PS If you have made it all the way to the bottom of this post then give yourself a pat on the back. You've earned it!

 

:razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to becareful and not confuse CC reclaims with loan reclaims.

 

loans are 8%stat on PPI PCM

 

CC you can go for RD but you CANT claim 8% on top even IF you go to court.[you can't have BOTH]

 

p'haps it better not too look too deeply into all these issues.

 

our SOC's are here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

each comes with its own instructions as well as those in the thread above.

 

unless you INTEND to goto court

 

on CC's its better to use the FOSCIrunning SOC.

 

if you intend eventusal court then by all means use CIsheet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

I'm really trying to distinguish between compound interest and restitutionary damages.

 

I understand how to calculate CI and I've already got the CAG calculators but for RD is the lender not obliged to divulge what profits it has made from the money it shouldn't have taken?

 

Does this not make CC and RD two different things then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21 will see this thread soon i bet

 

but you will never get an OC to reveal its profits!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...