Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ge Capital / Santander Storecards PPI - PRE Jan 2005 - Any Successes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Has anyone successfully claimed back their PPI insurance from Santander Cards for storecards taken out with mis-sold PPI through GE Capital prior to 2005? The cards in question are BHS and River Island, but I imagine that it is the smae situation regardless of the actual store?

 

Thanks, Dan & Jayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you've got all the statements go for it.

 

 

if not SAR GE or santy

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for their SAR response at the mo - I'll be going after them if they dig up any paperwork. They've still got three weeks to respond.

Score Card

 

For myself, family and friends......

 

WIN! MBNA - £8,000 CC PPI + 3 months interest for delayed refund

WIN! RBS - £1,400 CC PPI + 4 months interest added for delayed refund (via FOS)

WIN! RBS - £150 BC (via FOS)

WIN! Creation - £575 Store card PPI + 3 months interest for delayed refund

WIN! Creation - £120 BC

WIN! Ikano - £795 Store Card PPI

WIN! CapitalOne - £1700 CC PPI

WIN! CapitalOne - £110 BC

WIN! HSBC - £2,850 CC PPI

WIN! RBS/MINT - £1,900 - CC PPI

WIN! Halifax - BC - £102

WIN! Barclaycard - £130 BC

Awaiting offer HSBC - MPPI (via FOS)

Awaiting final response Barclaycard - CC PPI

Awaiting final response Morgan Stanley - CC PPI

SAR sent HSBC - CC PPI + Loan PPI

SAR sent GE Money - Store Card PPI - not holding out much hope as very old account

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone, we had originally requested the statements, but not a full SAR.

 

When we sent in the complaint, we used the standard FOS claim form and have now received a response.

 

Santander didn't make any comment about it being GE Capital and them not having been regulated, and have said that we can write to FLA.

 

What is interesting is that they could find a copy of the River Island application form but not the BHS form. They have included a copy of the form as evidence stating that my wife ticked the box (although the box had been electronically crossed) and so she had opted in. They also claim there was no requirement for them to record their sales processes at the time. In addition to this, her occupation is shown as self employeed, which they have typed into the form, so would clearly have been aware of the inappropriate nature of the cover.

 

Any suggestions as to what we should do next? Should we still do a SAR for the first form or work on the basis that they cannot provide a copy?

 

If it helps I can scan and attach a copy of the letter and application form?

 

Thanks, Dan and Jayne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a pre-ticked affair to me.....a lot of these cards appear to have had boxes ticked by the shop or lender and not by the applicant.

 

So this response you have had is with regard to a PPI claim....is it their final response?

 

If so you can still challenge them direct over it alternatively you could call fos and start the complaints process going with the authorities.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IMS, they have stated that it is their final response, so I guess going back to them will just result in going round in circles.

 

Do I still need to SAR them to get the BHS application form, or should I accept that they haven't got it? The account is still live. Are the FOS a better option than the FLA?

 

Thanks as always for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You don't actually need the agreement...if the applicant was self employed then the policy would have been useless anyway.

 

Of the "official" bodies I would always start with fos.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

GE Capital were fined £610,000 for systematic miss-selling of PPI's by FSA in approx 2007.....

 

I am helping an elderley gent with his Debenhams Storecard around 2003/4...HAVE to SAR them too although fact of PPI is on Monthly statements ...but chance of getting premiums back is high as they are 'well known' by FSA....Santander bought GE Capital so I guess one would have to contact them

 

Also read the Storecard that was upgraded to Credit Card...is also GE Capital and case was won by one of our Caggers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hope this helps...it is FSA Register for Authorised and Registered Firms...Address for everything

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmMainSearch.do?pageNumber=1&firmName=escape(escape(GE%20Capital))&postcodeOut=&postcodeIn=&searchType=1&currAuthorisedInd=

 

 

m2ae

just playing Dx...

:-)

Edited by means2anend
Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

 

To answer your question. I have not come across anyone who has got beyond the stage I am at , have a read of my thread, but in summary I complained to Santander , who did not uphold and also said it was pre 2005 so not signed up to FSA. On advice on FOS complianed to the underwriter, who referred me back to Santander. It is back with FOS and is with an adjudicator.

I have read many threads on here and on MSE and have not come across anyone who has got beyond this point. I think FOS may be doing a test case, but as I have not been allocated an adjudicator yet, I cant get an answer as to what they are doing. I have seen examples of people who have been at this stage for several years.

Still worth making a complaint , even if you have to go through the same process.

 

Have a look at my thread which is about two store cards pre 2005.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?323576-Santander-PPI-on-Debenhams-Store-Card&highlight=WFLOSS

 

Good luck

 

Regards

W

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the update everyone, I don't know if it makes a difference, but in Santander's final response, they did not make any reference to the cards having been taken out prior to 2005 and that they were unregulated at the time. Would it help if I posted a copy of the letter?

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Has anyone successfully claimed back their PPI insurance from Santander Cards for storecards taken out with mis-sold PPI through GE Capital prior to 2005? The cards in question are BHS and River Island, but I imagine that it is the smae situation regardless of the actual store?

 

Thanks, Dan & Jayne

 

Have look at this see if it applies to your circumstances

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?309207-Debenhams-Store-Card-PPI-***Urgent-Help-Required*******&p=3738900&viewfull=1#post3738900

 

...and investigate it as part of your LETTER OF CLAIM ...not any appeal...I may do it if the facts show there was concealed commissions being paid

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a store card through GE Capital, I'm 99% sure it was pre 2005!

 

I made a claim for the return of "sold over the phone" PPI, last year. To give them their dues, Santander dealt with my claim very quickly, and I got all my money back plus a bit extra.

L/Woods B/Card/Cabot - Unenforceable CCA, SD Issued *WON+COSTS*

Capital One/Cabot - No CCA account irrecoverable.

Citi/DLC Hillesden - No CCA account irrecoverable

MBNA/Aegis - Unenforceable CCA

B/Card/HFO - Unenforceable CCA

Fashion World - No CCA account irrecoverable

TRUECALL IS A GODSEND!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i ahve a claim with fos for laura ashley card , its currently at the stage where its being referred to the unwriter, After a conversation with FOS its almost as if they feel its a waste of time and we have no recourse, I wonder does anyone know where the legal test case is at at the moment?

i also have a russel and bromley card with santander and a john lewis card which will fall into this pre 2005 black hole, I am surprised the press havent clicked yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

i ahve a claim with fos for laura ashley card , its currently at the stage where its being referred to the unwriter, After a conversation with FOS its almost as if they feel its a waste of time and we have no recourse, I wonder does anyone know where the legal test case is at at the moment?

i also have a russel and bromley card with santander and a john lewis card which will fall into this pre 2005 black hole, I am surprised the press havent clicked yet

 

Hi

 

Which legal test case are we talking?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that only Santander Cards appear to be taking this stance, and how are they able to get away with ducking the issue, while all the other companies seem happy enough to pay up? Surely GE Capital weren't the only unregulated company pre 2005???

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am actually surprised that the press hasnt clicked on to the fact that there are loopholes there and big boys like Santander are getting away with it. I may be a little naive but surely the PPI collected by santander on these cards should be paid back if eligible when they took over the cards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...