Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg Loan PPI Advice Needed Please. **Resolved**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2803 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Synopsis

Took out £10000 loan over 60 months with PPI in July 2004. Hit financial problems in September 2008 and been paying on a free DMPsince then.

In March 2012 made a claim for Mis-sold PPI.

April 2012, Claim Upheld and Offered £21XX.XX + £38X.XX = £25XX.XXplus another sum for 8% interest.

What are theproblems?

1. They have offered £70X.XX for 8% interest. My calculations (using the spread sheet from here)show a sum of £10XX.XX, a difference of £37X.XX.

2. They have sent £28X.XX of my PPI to the DCA. Reason not specified. But their letter states, “As your account isstill open, in line with the Financial Services Authority guidelines and as aresponsible lender with a commitment to treating customers fairly (TCF) (sic), your loan has been credited with £28X.XX to put yourloan in the position it would have been in had you not taken PPI, as far aspracticably possible.” Is my accountstill open, they sold it to a DCA?

3. Transaction history from SAR shows that Loan wassold at a balance of 17XX.XX in July 2011. CRA shows this as the last balance on the balance history for Egg. However, DCA CRA entry shows Opening balance of £28XXwhich is original default figure. A difference of £11XX.

4. Reworking the loan without the PPI shows that theloan + interest total repayment would have been for £118XX.XX

5. The total of the payments I have made to EGG andDCA total £139XX.XX and DCA shows £15XX still outstanding meaning a totalrepayment of 155XX.XX This is £37XX.XXmore than the reworked loan. Evenoffsetting the PPI refund (minus the 8%) against this, still leaves anoutstanding amount of £11XX.XX. Presumethat £11XX of this is the DCA figures.

Can anyone make sense of this and advise course(s) ofaction.

Many thanks.

Jedicris

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the debt is sold they cannot offset!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK,

 

That was in fact the same spreadsheet but I input all the figures into it - just to be sure - and got the same result.

 

Tries a few combinations to try and see how they got their figures but nothing so far.

 

Jedicris

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

OK can you post up the figures from the agreement please and a copy of the spreadsheet and I'll have a look.

 

Make sure you remove all personal information first.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok first thing that leaps out is that you have put all 60 payments in there. If you went on a DMP, did you not make reduced payments?

 

Were there missed payments before the DMP?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have definitely assigned the account to a 3rd party, then they are not permitted to offset..

 

Regarding your suggestion that the refund will be set off against a debt now owned by NEW DCA, this is wholly inappropriate and unacceptable according to the Law of Property Act 1925.

You no longer own the alleged debt and have no right to withhold monies in respect of it. If NEW DCA wish to pursue me for any amount they allege I owe them, that is their prerogative.

 

The authority for my views is the case of Edlington Properties v. Fenner & Co. Ltd [2005] EWHC 2158 (QB) which affirms this position, that the assignor has no right of set-off to a third party (assignee) for a damages claim brought against it post-assignment, as any equitable set-off in this regard is personal in nature and the debt sold is not transferred subject to it.

 

Further information on the right of setoff can be found on the Financial Ombudsman’s site which clarifies in layman’s terms the rights of banks to take the action you indicated in your settlement letter. Banking: firms' right of 'set off'.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Citizen B,

 

Thanks for that, will try to get that in the post tomorrow.

They have sold it. In amongst all the SAR info that they sent, are several entries stating that it has been sold to DCA.

 

Thanks

Jedicris

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two places where you have to put the new DCA's name in.. I couldnt get the colour option to work so that I could highlight them better :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

 

I had considered that amongst the various scenarios that I had run but didn't seem to get anywhere near their figures.

 

No payments were missed before going on to dmp.

 

Two examples attached.

 

Jedicris.

Eggloan StatIntSheet to DCA v101.xls

Eggloan StatIntSheet to Default v101.xls

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two places where you have to put the new DCA's name in.. I couldnt get the colour option to work so that I could highlight them better :)

 

Thanks CitizenB

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received any previous rebate, perhaps if they cancelled the PPI when you defaulted on the loan?

 

How about letting us have the figures they have offered....a fresh paid of eyes may find something

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

 

Many thanks, perhaps a fresh pair of eyes are needed.

 

Figures are:

Total PPI Premiums (a) £2171.40

Plus interest on premiums paid (b) £384.43

Plus 8% interest © £704.61

Total Award of compensation £3260.44

 

To me it all seems OK apart from the 8% interest.

 

Even if I only take the premiums up to when it defaulted, I still get £958.19 for the 8% interest on a total premiums paid for 49 months equaling £2093.20, instead of the £2555.83 that they have quoted.

 

If the loan had gone full term then total payments would have been 60 x £42.72 = £2563.20

 

Hope the fresh set of eyes can see past the kerfuddle.

 

Many thanks

 

Jedicris.

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok I've had a look and from the information available I reckon they are out by some £250 on the statutory interest too.

 

The figures for premium and the contractual interest are, I think, ok.

 

I would be inclined to write to them and ask for the breakdown of the figures...they should send you a schedule of the individual components. After all, if you were to take this to fos then that is what they can order to be provided so lets see of we can get it now.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21,

 

Many thanks for this.

 

Glad that I'm not imagining it and going dolally.

 

Letter of to them in the morning to ask for breakdown.

 

Many thanks again.

 

Jedicris

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Egg have responded to my letter about the difference in the calculations regarding the 8% interest and about the offest they have made.

 

Makes for interesting reading. They say that they have the right to offset EVEN IF the loan has been sold.

 

Letter posted to site.

 

Jedicris

redacted letter about eggloan.pdf

REMEMBER! Hunger is the enemy - NOT the hungry!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh no they haven't!!!

 

if this is barclaycard admining it

they know full well they cant do that!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry yes its a loan!

 

silly me

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...