Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My estate agent has gone into liquidation - deposit money?

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Dear all,


Unfortunately my estate agent who lets out the property I live in has gone into Liquidation.


I am a student, and started letting the property form July last year, for 1 year. So the contract I signed with the estate agent for the property will terminate in July 2012. I have a written contract.


The estate agents have my damage deposit which was £675 (one and a half months rent)


I have found out today that they have not put it into protection by the Deposit Protection Scheme.


I will cease to pay the remaining rent.


Where does this leave me? What are my options? Do I still have to pay the rent to the landlord? Isn't it illegal what the estate agents have done?


How can I get my damage deposit back?


Could someone please help me out?



Link to post
Share on other sites

The landlor will be responsible for the deposit and any wrongdoings of the agent.


You should write to the LL immediately and put him on notice. It is up to the LL to puruse the agent.


Start aking notes and also keep good pics of the flat.

You are certainly entitled to withold rent if that rent adds up to the deposit and if all of the deposit is due back to you.


Best thing to do is to enter into friendly dialogue with the LL. Don't forget that he is a victim as well -and may not have rceived rent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes LL is responsible for your deposit and is now responsible for protecting your deposit. You could be entitled to 3x deposit, but if LL protects the deposit prior to your case coming to court then he would avoid the fine.


As Bankfodder says, he is a victim here. He also may not fully understand that *he* is responsible for the deposit and *he* needs to pursue agent. It's possible that agent will have held the money in a protected client account (it's also possible that he spent it on drinking and gambling).


You could politely inform him that unfortunately he is the victim here, and ask that he protect your deposit. If he is unwilling to protect your deposit I'd be inclined to withhold last month's rent - it's really too late to start taking him to court.


Do you have an "address for service" for the Landlord - often this will appear in the contract as relating to Section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. See here or google further:




May be a good idea to get your proofs of rent payments in order (eg. printing off bank statements if they are online).

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have the landlords adress. its funny because prior to this we contacted him/her and they told us that they didn't want to contacted directly and only through the agent. We've had hell both with the land lord and the agent this year.


So the next step is to get the landlord to protect my deposit under DPS? If this happens then I should pay them the full rent? Or should I request a reduction in the rent since I will no longer have an agent to handle my affairs and because technically the contract has been breached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the agents contract was with the LL not with you.....

It should not effect you in any way, apart from the fact that you now have to deal direct with the LL.

IMO there is no grounds for withdrawing rent.

I am not a solicitor :!::!:


Most of my knowledge came from this site :-D:-D


If I have been helpful in any way at all .............. Please click my star..... :-(:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

smokes, DPS is only one of the 3 approved schemes and rarely used by EAs.. They may have used on of the other schemes which are Insurance based. I think your AST will state that the deposit will be held in an approved deposit scheme. Either way, LL is ultimately resp for its return. LL may not have wanted Ts to have direct contact if he was paying EA for a full management service. He may not be aware that EA has folded. You have no right to withold rent for deposit. Deposit is held until end of T to cover any T damages first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...