Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Irwin Mitchell want more PCM on old Natwest Debt CCJ.


Everett
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Irwin Mitchell took me court and gained a CCJ against me 5 years ago.

 

Payment was offered and excepted and has never been missed.

 

However, today they sent me a statement and despite paying over £70 a month I owe £3k more than when I started

and they now require me to complete an I&E form.

 

Do I have to do this seeing it is a CCJ ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Were they allowed to add post judgment interest ? What did it say on the order from the court!

 

Apart from which, if the court ordered you to pay the sum of £70.00 per month, then that is all you need pay and Irwin Mitchell will need to take further court action in order to ask the Judge to increase the amount.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, A couple of questions what was the CCJ for,

and what was the exact order made by the court?

It seems that interest is being added from what you

say.

What length of time did the court order that these

payments should be made over.

Does the statement of account show how your

payments are allocated, and what is being added

each month?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, A couple of questions what was the CCJ for,

and what was the exact order made by the court?

It seems that interest is being added from what you

say.

What length of time did the court order that these

payments should be made over.

Does the statement of account show how your

payments are allocated, and what is being added

each month?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I telephoned them today and the balance was an error and they gave me the correct amount and no interest is being added.

 

However they are insisting they they are quite within in their rights to ask for an Income and Expenditure

update as according to themselves the CCJ was made on a temporary basis ?

 

 

Never heard this before ?

 

Shall I just ignore the request ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmmmm, Have you got your copy of the judgement??

If not you need to get a copy and check exactly what the

the judgement was and on what terms the payments are

to be made.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I telephoned them today and the balance was an error and they gave me the correct amount and no interest is being added.

However they are insisting they they are quite within in their rights to ask for an Income and Expenditure update as according to themselves the CCJ was made on a temporary basis ? Never heard this before ?

Shall I just ignore the request ?

 

What utter rubbish. You really need to know what the court order said. If it was only temporary, why have they waited 5 years to contact about an I&E ??

 

I think the first thing you need to do is to WRITE to them confirming the outcome of your telephone conversation. That they had misrepresented the amount outstanding and that YOU require a properly audited statement immediately, showing the correct amount.

 

At the same time you can confirm that there has been no change in your financial circumstances since the Court made the order. In fact you could state that due to the economical situation you are probably in a worst situation than you were at that time however, you will continue to honour the payment order made by the court.

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ditto

one poss reason why they may be asking for updated info is as you suggest maybe that they want to consider applying for a variation to increase payments.

but, as citb says, judgment is 70/month and your circumstances have not improved, and may even be worse.

imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

It strikes me there may be provision

for review in the actual court order.

 

Which is why we need to see the order. However, my question still remains.. how come they have waited 5 years to ask for a review ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, my question still remains.. how come they have waited 5 years to ask for a review ?

There's a recession on ya know!:scared: They want more money to buy chocolate hob nobs...:tea:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a recession on ya know!:scared: They want more money to buy chocolate hob nobs...:tea:

 

Been so long since I had such a luxury.. you will have to remind me what they are :lol:

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

everett

ooi how much roughly is the total ccj for?

as stated above, unless the order says '.....to be reviewed by the court in x mths' or the like, then they can safely bog off?

if your circumstance are indeed alot worse, then you could consider applying for a variation to decrease amount of payments! a court fee though unless exempt. but, that would p them off :)

imo

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Judgement in front of me its actually 4 years not 5 sorry !

 

But absolutely nothing ordering a review.

 

It tells

 

That I have made an offer of payment which as been excepted

It is therefore ordered that you must pay the claimant £xx.xx for debt

[and interest to date of judgement] and £340.00 in costs.

 

You must pay the claimant a total of £xx.xx

 

By instalments of £xx.xx

 

And the first payment to reach the claimant by 00/00/00

 

Absolutely nothing about reviews.

 

As for the interest that was agreed to be frozen by Nat West the OC.

 

Ok here is a copy of the CCJ.

CCJ irwin.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

From reading what you posted earlier, I cant see anything to suggest they are able to simply ask you to increase your payments or prove that you can. It would appear to me that if they want to do that, then they must do it correctly and ask the court for a variation.. at which time you will be asked by the COURT to provide an Income and Expenditure sheet..

 

HTH

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

5 years ago,

despite paying the same amount through the CCCS

Nat West gained a CCJ against me to “give the debt some security” in their words.

 

They used the law firm Irwin Mitchell to do this.

 

Since then Irwin Mitchell have been administering the debt,

and I pay the amount to them every month ( via Standing Order ) without failure.

 

Just recently though, they have said they require an Income and expenditure form to be completed by myself.

 

Having took advice from this site ,

and nowhere in the CCJ does it provide for a regular review,

I ignored their requests ( four in total and in writing ).

 

However things have turned a little more sinister from Irwin Mitchell.

 

Two weeks ago I received a letter saying that since I had ignored their requests for an I&E to be completed

they where now considering obtaining a re - determination and applying for a forthwith-charging order.

 

Today I received a letter from them thanking me for my continued payments via standing order

but that they would no longer be using the account my payment is made into,

and I must contact them to discuss options to amend my payment details.

 

Surely they should provide a new account number and sort code if this is the case and not ask me to contact them to discuss options ?

 

I think this is a ploy to obtain a charging order by saying I have not made payments

after they return them because their account is no longer open?

 

What should I do?

 

Should I continue to make payments to the account as instructed by the court ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go back to the court with their letter and ask for a hearing for them to explain their actions - sounds very very odd to me - or you could do an N244 Variation and ask to pay LESS which would really really annoy them.t

 

The amount the CCJ was set at is fixed, and only the court can vary it now - especially after all this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit about them changing the account you need to pay into is a ruse to get you to ring them and then be bullied lied and conned into paying more than the court order.

Formal complaint to these fools using their own complaints procedure http://www.irwinmitchell.com/aboutus/complaints/Pages/default.aspx

 

And then alert the legal ombudsman of their tactics http://www.legalombudsman.org.uk/

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I noticed this morning when checking through my bank account that IM have returned my last two Standing Order Payments.

 

As they made it clear from the outset that they intended to gain a charging order against my property

I think that this is another underhanded tactic to get their wish.

 

What is my next move ?

 

Is it possible that the CCJ has been handed back to the OC ?

Or they have changed account details and failed to notify me ?

 

Should I send them a cheque/PO for the amount returned ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes send them a postal order or cheque and ask them for their new bank details for the standing order.

 

According to your post of 5 November they told you that the account used for standing orders was going to be closed and asked you to confirm new payment arrangements.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No!

After informing them that the CCJ did not require any kind of review, and then asking them for their complaints procedure and threatening to report them to the FO, they sent me a letter saying that it was computer generated and to ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...