Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Mycathasfleas
      Insurance payout advice

      By Mycathasfleas · Posted

      I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • ennogs
      Insurance payout advice

      By ennogs · Posted

      Thanks
    • Spiritual Alchemist
      MET CCTV PCN - Occupants Left Carpark - Appealed - Starbucks (closed) 346 SouthGate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY

      By Spiritual Alchemist · Posted

      The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • lookinforinfo
      UKPC ANPR PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform - vehicle on site during restricted no parking period - Rom Valley Retail Park, Romford, RM7 0AF

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • LilMissM
      StepChange DMP - Multiple Debts

      By LilMissM · Posted

      Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Advice Needed for Husband and Wife DLA & Carers Allowance

Paige12

By Paige12
in Benefits and HMRC

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Paige12

Paige12

Posted
Posted

I'm hoping someone might be able to advise. I am on DLA Low Mobility and Mid Care. My husband claims Carer's Allowance for me and due to this we get couple rate Income Support. This has been the situation for the last couple of years.

 

My husband has been very ill in recent months and has just received High Care and High Mobility DLA.

 

I am confused as to what premiums we can apply for and also how this affects the Carer's Allowance he is paid. Can I now claim Carers Allowance for him so we would both be claiming carers allowance for one another?

 

Also what premiums are we allowed to claim and would this affect our entitlement to Income Support?

 

I've tried searching for information but I'm more confused than ever.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
xmedia

xmedia

Posted
Posted

Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

 

I'm not sure but think it is possible. I think technically 'caring for someone' can mean watching over someone so one person can watch over the other and vice versa even if they are both ill.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nystagmite

Nystagmite

Posted
Posted
I've tried researching dwp site and it does seem to say that a husband and wife both claiming mid/higher rate dla can claim carers allowance for each other?

 

Yes.

 

There is no rule saying that 2 disabled people can't claim for each other. As long as the care needs don't contradict the help each person gives.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Yes.

 

There is no rule saying that 2 disabled people can't claim for each other. As long as the care needs don't contradict the help each person gives.

 

Thanks for that. So I would need to put in a claim for Carers Allowance and also we would need to claim the enhanced disability premium?

Link to post
Share on other sites
fluffy25

fluffy25

Posted
Posted
Not wishing to be rude but how can one ill person be paid carers to look after the person who is being paid to look after them?

 

Surely if they are ill enough to require a carer themselves then they are not able to be a carer for someone else?

1 could be physically ill and need physical care and 1 can be mentally ill and need emotional support

Link to post
Share on other sites
SKJP

SKJP

Posted
Posted

An example of how it's possible...

 

Person A posesses the manual skills to be able to wash and dress themselves, but cannot do so to an acceptable level, because they have a mental health condition that means they need frequent prompting, encouragement, motivation, etc. from another person.

 

Person B has no issues with the mental health side of things but is physically disabled to the point that they cannot wash and dress themselves without assistance from another person.

 

So, Person A does the manual tasks that take care of both his and Person B's washing and dressing needs, and Person B provides the 'motivation' that enables Person A to carry out these tasks.

 

Being 'ill', as stated above, doesn't preclude the ability to care for someone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKEY DABODEE

MIKEY DABODEE

Posted
Posted (edited)

hi Paige,

you have two options here,

you need to Inform IS straight away as you are entitled to Enhanced DP. £14.05

 

You can claim Carers Allowance for your husband

but if you dont then you are entitled to single rate Severe Disability premium as a couple, because he gets DLA middle rate care.

If you claim CA then its

the extra carers premium at £31 or if you dont then its single SDP at £55.30

so its up to you :)

I am taking it you have no one else over 18 living with you, eg children

I

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just want to make sure I've got it right. So if I claim carers allowance then we would be £31 better off per week.

 

Whereas if I don't claim carers allowance we'd get a severe disability premium of £55.30.

 

So would we be financially better off then claiming the severe disability premium instead of the carers allowance?

 

Thanks in advance. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My husband has rang IS today and informed them of his DLA award and about the Enhanced Disablity Premium. The woman said she would sort it out . He asked about me claiming Carers Allowance for him and she said can do all that for us in IS. I imagine she'll send out a carers allowance form for me to fill in?

Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKEY DABODEE

MIKEY DABODEE

Posted
Posted (edited)

yes you would get the couple rate EDP sorry so correct there :)

 

but you are entitled to single SDP, on the claim if you dont claim CA for your husband thats £55.55 extra.....

 

and if you do claim CA you would get an extra £31 thats the CP, you would of course get the CA but as you know its taken fully in to account.

so £24.55 better of per week with out CA...... and getting the single SDP

but you will have to decide which way to go

 

I would say you havent got paid today as DLA has downloaded onto your claim and stopped payment.

easily rectifified hope you got it sorted

 

Arrears of the EDP will be backdated to the date of the award of the DLA

Couple rate :)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for all the help. I'll have to get on to IS next week and see what has happened with the payment that was due today. So it's probably looking like we'd be financially better off per week with husband claiming the Severe Disability Premium instead of me claiming Carers Allowance. We can inform them of that when we ring to sort out what happened with the payment this week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Paige12

Paige12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just a quick question regarding if anything changed with my DLA. I'm on the mid-care so if they changed me to low care at any stage my husband would lose his Carers Allowance which in turn would mean we would lose Income Support. In that case, could we then stop the Severe Disability Premium for my husband and change to me claiming Carers Allowance so that our income support would continue? Would they let us swap over claims like that?

Link to post
Share on other sites
MIKEY DABODEE

MIKEY DABODEE

Posted
Posted (edited)
Just a quick question regarding if anything changed with my DLA. I'm on the mid-care so if they changed me to low care at any stage my husband would lose his Carers Allowance which in turn would mean we would lose Income Support. In that case, could we then stop the Severe Disability Premium for my husband and change to me claiming Carers Allowance so that our income support would continue? Would they let us swap over claims like that?

 

 

yes, if you went on to low rate care then his CA would cease but he would get an eight week run of IS under those circumstances, in that time you coud make a claim to CA for your husband and then make the claim to IS in your name,

 

At the end of the eight week run on your clam for CA would be up and running and away you would go,

You could put the new claim in then

 

The SDP on the old claim would remain in payment untill your CA is in payment.....:)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...