Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LBL & Hammonds UK


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm after some advice, I too a couple of years ago fell victim of LBL, circumstances changed, missed a couple of payments, attempted to re finance and come to a repayment agreement several times, only to keep getting same answer (they didn't want to know unless the whole amount was paid in one go)

Subsequently the car went off the road (sorn) in a secure facility , during this time, 2 or 3 alleged bailiffs from different companies came to my door with threats and abuse, the first one managed to get some money from me (to stop proceedings allegedly ) as no agreement was re drawn.

 

The next two lots of bailiffs where really abusive, I managed to fight them off by stating that they where trespassing private land and that I would get the police involved.

Almost a year has gone by since I last heard from anyone on this matter.

 

Now a letter from Hammonds UK (whom had sent the first lot of bailiffs ) has pitched up in the post demanding the full amount in 48hours or else litigation will occur and the car repossed (car still off the road in a safe place)

also they are claiming for a new amount which is way higher than the original amount quoted by LBL.

 

Where do I stand with this people? Do they hold a Licence? Can they come and enter the property and force me to take them to / or open the lock up if I where to be followed there?

what can I / should I do with regards to the litigation threats?

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

]I too am having problems with LBL/nine regions ltd... I have used them twice before, each time paying back in full well before the loan had ran its intended course ( IE,they have made a lot of money from me) I got into a spot of temporary financial difficulty, rather than giving me a little space to sort things out, they started hammering me with additional charges per letter, per call, per credit search etc. As it stands/has stood since I stopped paying them, I raised a complaint with the office of fair trading and also the Financial Services authority. I received two responses to my complaints in writing, both of which were just fob offs. I then received a rather vague letter from Nine regions Ltd, that I realized that they had went into liquidation. They have assigned (sold) my debt onto another company called CC Collections. I was enraged by this revelation.

 

It had crossed my mind that the reason they were not interested in being reasonable and that they only seemed interested in adding additional costs and charges was that they were aware that they had lost their Office of Fair Trading cases and that their demise was imminent. It would appear that they have been levying as much as possible to make the debt more valuable, to then sell onto other unscrupulous companies.

 

I called the telephone number on the "re-assignation letter" which still had 34 Deodar Rd as the address. I spoke to a girl there who when asked, informed me that she worked for a company called "Hermes Property Soloutions", she advised that CC collections had bought some of the loans. I asked her for the consumer credit license number for CC collections, she paused and then came back a few mins later with the number 612348, I called the consumer credit department of the OFT, they advised that this number is for a different company and that as far as they're aware, CC collections does not own a credit license, nor is it listed as a trading name as a company who does. Further to this, the company number for CC collections. quoted on the assignation letter, when searched at companies house, comes up with a different address than the one quoted on the letter next to the company number.

 

I am 150% that something dodgy, if not actually illegal has and is going on. I contacted the office of fair trading at local level and was shocked and disgusted to be fobbed of by the staff there; they thanked me for making them aware of the potential lack of consumer credit license; however then went on to advise that it is a common misconception that they are there to protect individual consumers and that I would be best to either try to negotiate with CC collections or to seek legal advice.

 

I am truely disgusted!!! Not only does our government bail out several banks using our money, they then allow them to shy away from lending, forcing desperate people to use "other sources", they are aware that some of these other sources are not fit and proper, so they gradually shut them down but they do nothing to help the individuals who have been ill-treated. Being poor, whether temporarily or otherwise is not a crime, what LBL and its owner have done... clearly is!

 

This was last week, I am about to complete on selling my property, on completion, i will be instructing a solicitor to take this forward on my behalf. I wish anyone who has the unfortunate experience of dealing with Log book loans the best of luck and I will update you with how I get on. Ps: I was never trying to get my loan written off, I've paid back the original £1200 and an extra £200, I was just trying to get them to allow me to settle at reasonable cost! THEY ARE ANIMALS!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...