Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA request, postal order (1£) from overseas - how?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4435 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, all, hope someone can lend a brainwave or share their experience.

 

I need to send a CCA request, and it should be accompanied by a postal order of £1. At the moment, though, I am not in the UK. I looked into the options:

1 - ask someone to get a postal order in the UK, print out my request and mail it by Royal Mail to the agency; this is not impossible but would hate to inconvenience people

2 - ask someone to buy a postal order, scan the receipt, email it to me and I can email everything to the agency - will it work at all? still, a hassle

3 - ask someone to buy the postal order, snail mail it to me (do they expire?), so that I could snail mail it back to the UK from here - lots of hassle and lots of time

 

Are there other options?

Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, that is my Option 1 - afraid to cause hassle, though. I was wondering if there might be another way to pay - to the agency bank account, maybe, or in some electronic way/over the internet.

Unfortunately, Royal Mail only accept cash for postal orders, and from what I read, they print out the check on the spot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a great idea, thanks! I might try that - although they don't normally allow money to be sent via snail-mail.

And another thing - the deadline for their response is 12+2, considering UK addresses; for international mail it probably should be the 12th day from the moment someone at that company acknowledges receipt of the request letter. It is getting messier by the minute...

 

I could send the request by email, I guess, but they can easily turn down the request cos I won't have attached the fee - that would just give them extra time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 12 days from receipt of the request but nowadays it's meaningless as it's no longer an offence if they fail to comply.

 

Are they chasing you for a debt because given where you are they will be urinating into the wind if they try and pursue you. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a looooooong Home Learning College story; actually, I never saw a copy of the original agreement or whatever it was. There was a dispute with the HLC, then the phonecalls started, then the agency interfered. I managed to get them stop phoning me and my previous UK address (they even apologised), so time for the CCA request, I guess.

 

Not that I will ever need the credit rating, but it is a matter of principle, too. :-)

 

P.S. What happens if they can't comply? Sell the info to someone else? Bounce it back to HLC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with CCA requests nowadays is that they don't have to provide a copy of the actual agreement they can legally send a reconstituted agreement.

 

They will more than likely sell the alleged debt on in any case & then claim tax relief, it just wouldn't be viable for them to pursue. It will then be passed down the DCA foodchain into total obscurity as they gradually realise they haven't a snowball's chance in hell of taking enforcement action. Of course it won't stop them sending the odd letter, email or 'phonecall [if they have your details] in the hope they can bully you into making payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I came upon that info - and a bit confused which CCA template to use since "true" copy seems to be no longer a requirement. Still, it would be good to know the state of affairs; unfortunately, I hadn't discovered CAG while I was speaking with HLC.

Hopefully APEX will return the paperwork back there; at the moment the only word they know is money, money, money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean, something along this lines?:

The emphasis in the Carey case on section 78 appears to have obscured the real claim that exists under section 61(1)(a) and 127(3) of the Act. These sections dictate that a creditor must be able to produce a signed document (not necessarily the credit agreement) that contains the prescribed terms. The document must include the credit limit, the interest rate and details of how and when a debtor is to discharge his payment obligations. A failure to produce such a document is still capable of rendering the agreement irredeemably unenforceable.

***

However consumers should remember that should a creditor issue court proceedings against them, without first locating a signed document, they would have a defence to that action. Without a signed document the creditor will have to convince the court that on balance a document signed by the consumer containing the prescribed terms would have been produced at the time of execution. The onus is on them to prove this.

 

(can't post link)

 

Cerberusalert, thank you very much! Sorry I have hijacked my own thread. One last question, and will shut up: I do want a copy of my CCA, and all relevant documentation; in case HLC has started ping-ponging me to DCAs, does it mean that they are under no obligation to provide me with these documents (as in documents related to "my case", not sure if it is the same as a SAR will get me)? Thanks again! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean, something along this lines?:
Yes.

 

It is your legal right to request a CCA at any time & it has to be provided although if you ask a debt collector for it they'll either forward the request to the original creditor or tell you to do it.

 

A SAR with get you copies of statements, letters etc and in some cases they will also include the CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please ignore - question answered in the Scottish forum - thanks to 42man! :-)

Cerberusalert: I have just read in the Scottish forum that a company no longer has to comply with the 12 day requirement to provide a CCA; in fact, they can take as much time as they want??? Can't verify it through ggogling.

 

Does it mean that now the rules on complying with a SAR have also become more lax? And now the requester is put in a limbo, waiting for a response.

 

At the ICO gov uk page (can't post link) it is also explained that a company is not obliged to start processing your request until you have paid the fee (if I need extra information, like logs from the VLC, for example,access to tutors etc I suppose they are entitled to a fee larger than £10 but up to £50 max). Is the 40 calendar day requirement for SAR (since payment, if I am correct) still valid?

 

Answer from 42man:

They have to provide all they hold on you with regard to your personal datalink3.gif within 40 calendar days, it doesn't have a bearing on any legal claim they may have made (as you can potentially go for disclosure on a claim by them) but you can still take them to court if they fail to supply the information within 40 days (however in the case of a SARlink3.gif, if they fail to provide anything in 40 days (or it is incomplete) then you issue a letter bfore action giving them a further 7 days to comply, enclosing a copy of the original request)

Edited by fractal
Link to post
Share on other sites

Without taking over another thread, I thought i'd post on your own.....the other option if they fail to comply with your SAR is to report it to the ICO. (But this can take ages).....you might find these useful too -

 

http://www.kent.ac.uk/data-protection/Forms/subject_access_guide.pdf

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/taking_a_case_to_court.pdf

 

Example of a letter before action - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?178660

Link to post
Share on other sites

At one time if they failed to provide a CCA within 12 days they were in default and could not pursue the debt, after a further 30 days if they still failed to produce it they committed an offence. This was removed from the Act but if they still fail to produce after 12 days they cannot take enforcement action.

 

Does it mean that now the rules on complying with a SAR have also become more lax? And now the requester is put in a limbo, waiting for a response.]
No, a SAR is governed by the ICO who have powers to fine companies that don't comply. The problem is they can take a year or more to deal with any complaint.

 

At the ICO gov uk page (can't post link) it is also explained that a company is not obliged to start processing your request until you have paid the fee]

 

the fee must be paid with the request.

 

I suppose they are entitled to a fee larger than £10 but up to £50 max). Is the 40 calendar day requirement for SAR (since payment, if I am correct) still valid?]
They can charge extra if they can show that producing information causes them inappropriate costs. yes 40 days.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for all your help! It is so fast, and it is very reassuring that problems become actually solvable. I must say I was a complete mess when I ventured to start posting here!

 

Just in case anyone is reading, and back to the original question: if you want to avoid inconveniencing friends and need a UK address, it looks like there are services out there that receive (and scan in) mail for you, and can actually send mail with accompanying payment (postal order etc). Some are even PAYG and paypal friendly. I suppose I need to check reviews frist but that might also come in handy, as should help with staying on top of the paper-trail. I would be afraid to involve friends in the UK, as if APEX gets hold of a friend's address that would put all of us in a very embarrassing situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...