Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Filing N1 and a little stuck!!


tasadin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am persuing two accounts with LTSB, both of which are now closed. The first account was closed with an OD balance which transfered to the new account initially. The final account was closed in May 05.

 

I am claiming the following and want to ensure I have got it right.

 

Bank Charges totalling £527.50

Plus interest on those charges at an arbitary 16% OD interest rate which comes to £393.99 until the account was closed.

 

and this is next bit is where I am a little hazy... at this point the account was closed and passed to debt collection. As this is money I haven't got which the bank took do I

 

a) continue claiming 16% interest from date of closure until filing N1 under the principle of mutuality and reciprocity

 

or

 

b) claim 8% under section 69 from date of closure until filing N1. (Or have I misunderstood that I can only claim 8% from date of filing until court)

 

It will vastly affect my value section when filing the N1 and I really want to get this right and definately dont want anything being thrown back by the bank or the court.

 

I thought about MCOL but there just isnt enough room for things I need to say!

Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW

 

I would claim excess overdraft interest from the date of each charge until you issue the N1.

 

Then at a specific rate per day until the claim is settled.

 

If you are claiming contractual interest because it compounds, you cannot specify an amount per day as you can with Sec69 interest. You have to sepcify the daily rate at which it compounds.

 

On a personal note i cannot see a reason for picking an arbritrary rate?

 

If you want to claim contractual interest then select a rate from the current terms and conditions and have some logic why you select the rate. If/when you get to court you may have to explain why you picked a specific rate.

 

Seems to me logically the correct rate to apply is the rate for exceeding an overdraft if there is one. Not only is it typically the highest value but logically it suits your claim.

 

Finally if you select a rate when/if you get to court the judge can only reduce your claim, not increase it. If you start out at the highest rate theres more scope for the court to set a level they think fair.

 

JMHO

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your thoughts, you always seem to throw up lots of questions glenn :) .

 

I have asked if anyone knows LTSB overdraft excess interest rate but had no replies I tried finding it out myself on the web but with no joy.

 

I am a little hazy on the contractual interest and compounding, I did use vamps cracking spreadsheet to work out the figures But are we defining contractual as being compounded interest. This area is still very difficult to understand... and I may not have explained myself properly.

 

I know to claim the charges, I know I want the interest on the charges until the point the account was closed at whatever that rate is which I am still trying to find out. I then beleive that that total figure from account closure to date should be subject to an interest rate because the bank has my money and I don't (is this the contractual bit?).

 

I just want to be really sure I have my ducks in a row here and I think I may have read too many threads on here as I am getting more confused.:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasadin

 

Its easy 1st to find the rate on their website they will have the rates but if its not easy to find go to LTSB and ask for a set of T&Cs and charges.

 

If they ask why tell them your thinking about opening an account and want to compare banks.

 

RE interest, it does sound like youre a little confused.

 

With your charges if you were in your overdraft or exceeded the authorised limit, you paid interest.

 

On your statements each month there would have been a small amount of interest debited to your account, enter this and the balance of your account and Vamps sheets estimates the interest due to the charges.

 

Now, if you use MINDZAIs spreadsheet (can be found in his signature) enter all the values and on the front sheet enter the excess overdraft rate.

 

Then go look at the relevant sheet and hey prestothe amount of interest due as of todays date will be set out for you.

 

Compound/contractual interest is confusing since the terms are used often incorrectly imho.

 

Contractual interest the rate and method used by the parties to calculate interest paid.

 

Compound interest refers to the method of calculating the interest owed and is based on the premise of taking the original stake then adding interest to create a new stake. The interest is then applied again and so on for the required period at the required intervals.

 

Hope that helps

 

Glenn

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

That clears things up a little I hadnt thought about the T&C so thanks for that, I was a little slow there.

 

I don't have full statements, I have half statements from lloyds and half a list of charges but these do include the interest and the date on which it was charged. So in order to calculate interest I have used vamps sheets for if you don't have statements, and entered each charge on the date it occured at the 16% interest which I will change to the appropriate rate once I get hold of T&C info.

 

Edit... Just checked LTSB T&C and their standard OD interest rate is 16.5% and their unauthorised is 29.8%. To that end do I calculate the interest on the charges at the higher rate for the whole period of the account as the charges were only applied when we went over the O/D limit or do I charge them the higher rate just for the period that it took us over the O/D and then revert to the 16.5% for times when those charges remained in the account but we werent over the O/D limit... seems that this could get really intricate and complicated. I am leaning towards the higher rate because that would have been applied immediately the charge was added, but i do not have enough knowledge to know if this higher rate is continually added to a charge even once you come back within the O/D limit. My brain is gonna explode :p

 

I appreciate your time and help Glenn ... once I have the N1 done would it be ok to mail it to you for the once over just to make sure I got it right??:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tasadin

 

Lets get something straight here, the bank has unlawfully taken your money. You charge them unauthorised o/d rate for the whole period since they took it till the date they settle.

 

On the basis that the court can only reduce your claim and not increase it its my view that you should claim the highest rate you can on the basis that there is more room for the court to manouvre should they feel the need.

 

When calculating the interest paid i have to say thats a lot more complex, I would use the spreadsheet that Vampiress prepared to calculate this and leave it at that.

 

Incidentally the spreadsheet only presumes you pay interest if your account is in overdraft when the charge is applied. To correct this enter a value of -0.01 and it will work out a value.

 

dont forget the interest is only an estimate and should be declared as such.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

PS you can mail it to me use the pm or if that doesnt work drop me a pm and ill give you my mail address

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...