Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credits Overpayment - £2,900


wonky100
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

Just thought I'd share my story just to add another example of how infuriating and annoying the HRMC are.

 

Hubby and I are both employed and self employed. Have always given honest info and on time.

 

Unfortunately in 2009/2010 we made a very large self employed loss. After the year end hubby rang HMRC to tell them of large loss and to offset this against employed earnings. During the telephone conversation he was asked about our 2010/2011 earnings. My hubby told them he'd already told them what our earnings would be for 2010/2011. The lady wanted to know what our 2010/2011 profit or loss would be. Hubby advised he couldn't tell her what our profit or loss would be until year end but he did hope that it wouldn't be anything like 2009/2010. HMRC advised that it was best if we offset any profit or loss from our self employment there and then. Hubby advised he didn't want to do this and would rather wait until year end. HMRC advised that if we didn't offset then they would use the same figure for 2010/2011 as for 2009/2010, which had a large self employed loss, so hubby reluctantly agreed. Perhaps he should have stood his ground but they advised that if he didn't they would do it anyway. Damned if you do damned if you don't.

 

Fast forward to year end 2011 and loss nowhere near as large as 2009/2010, as expected. Tell HMRC July 2011 after self assessment completed and we are advised in August 2011 that we have been overpaid. No s**t Sherlock! We write to dispute overpayment. It takes then until December 2011 to advise pay up. We have a copy of the telephone recording when they advise that if we don't change our earnings then they'll do it anyway, plus after several letters we have a letter not apologising for not giving us the service we "feel2 we should have received but apologising for "we have failed to provide the level of service which you are entitled to expect and should have received". HMRC mess up and give misguided advice, but hey, still pay up.

 

To boot their debt management team are now chasing and are threatening debt collectors/bailiffs and this was even before we received their last letter with the apology.

 

Letters say if we can help, please call us. But you call them and they can't help.

 

You ring the debt management team and they say there's nothing they can do. Can't call the wolves off unless HMRC tell them the matter is in dispute. They tell us to call the helpline. The not so helpful helpline can't help!

 

Letter has now been sent to The Adjucator's Office with a copy to the debt management team and a copy to the CEO at the tax office.

 

No longer entitle to any benefits since the threshold was reduced, so can't offset any overpayments against future payments. So not only do we not receive any benefits anymore but are now faced with having to pay this back!

 

I know we won't win as it's HMRC afterall, but I'm going to put up a bl**dy good fight. In the meantime, trying to save as much as possible!

 

HMRC staff should know what they are doing. They shouldn't be allowed to get away with giving misguided advice.

 

Just thought I'd share this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can sometimes fight the big guys - I assisted my sister in a complaint to the benefits people whereby they had underpaid her for 2 years without her knowledge as they put sanctions against her (relating to csa claim) without telling her and they refused to backdate the increase. It took 3 letters but we got the money she was rightfully owed. They admitted the CSA information was a mess so they couldn't be sure she hadn't sent back the relevant form (which she had).

 

I also had a disagreement with the job centre over incorrect information they gave me when I needed to sign off of job seekers allowance and again they refused to pay me 2 weeks money but after 2 complaint letters to the job centre and then a call in which I asked for the chief executives contact details they decided they were wrong and paid me what I was owed!

 

Its always worth arguing as it only costs a few stamps :) My tip is to find the top person if your complaint gets nowhere and send details to the chief executive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses. Wasn't expecting any. Just thought I'd share my experiences.

 

Letter sent to the Adjuicators, The Debt Management Dept and Steve Lamey, CEO, Benefits & Credits 22 Feb. No acknowledgement from any of them yet. Will let you know how I get on eventually but am not holding my breath.

 

Thanks again for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Quick update - we lost! No surprise there then!

 

But at least they've agreed that we can repay them over 3 years rather than 12 months that they were originally demanding!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...