Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Confused!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi eveyone.

I've always thought I was pretty good at maths but I'm giving myself a headache.

I have a ppi claim going.

 

I took out the loan in February 2007

Loan Amount £19994.10

PPI £5945.10

Total=[£25940]

 

Monthly Payment £348.50 (started 02-07-07)

I've made 56 opf 96 payments to date.

 

The total repayable is £33,456 so interest of £7,516 total

 

I know I should get the £5945.10 back but its the interest thats giving me a headache.

 

I know they allow 8% interest should be given so that would give me £5945.1 X 1.08% gives £6420.71

Is this all I'm entitled to or does part of the monthly payments also need to be returned.

I am using the CAG PPI calculator but don't know the Apr%, the Monthly int% or the annual int%.

 

I know I'm supposed to use the details form the Loan details calc in the interest refund amount sheet but I can't make head or tails of it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Use the first spreadsheet here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

Also have a read of No.1 in my signature...it tells you how to work out what you will get back.

 

You will get back the premiums and interest you have paid thus far plus 8% on those. The remainder of the loan will be restructured to remove the PPI element.

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just wanted to check a few things.

5945.10 as a percentage of .25940 is 22.92.

I multiply that by my monthl;y repayment (348.5) and get 79.87.

I inserted the payment dates and this amount and it autpmatically calculates the simple interest, spitting it out at the top.

Monthly Payment of PPI £4,552.51 8% Simple Interest £860.81 Total £5,413.32 That's the correct way of doing it yes?

 

The other bit is 8% on top of my PPI amount so

£5945.1 X 1.08% gives £6420.71

 

totalling out at £11,834.03

 

They should also subsequently remove that 79.87 from my repayments reducing it from 348.50 to 268.63

 

I'm just double checking my facts before printing these and keeping them together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just wanted to check a few things.

5945.10 as a percentage of .25940 is 22.92.

I multiply that by my monthl;y repayment (348.5) and get 79.87.

I inserted the payment dates and this amount and it autpmatically calculates the simple interest, spitting it out at the top.

Monthly Payment of PPI £4,552.51 8% Simple Interest £860.81 Total £5,413.32 That's the correct way of doing it yes?

 

Yes...spot on...you will have a list of 56 or 57 payments of £79.87

 

The other bit is 8% on top of my PPI amount so

£5945.1 X 1.08% gives £6420.71

 

No...you only get the 8% on the payments you have actually made...i.e. as per the spreadsheet

 

totalling out at £11,834.03

 

They should also subsequently remove that 79.87 from my repayments reducing it from 348.50 to 268.63

 

Correct

 

I'm just double checking my facts before printing these and keeping them together.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right 8% on the payments I made, plus the return of the initial premium, right?

5,413.32 & 5945.10=11358.42

 

Another question if I may.

I completed the questionnaire from HSBC websire (its the obudsman one) and sent it to the bank with a letter outlining my reasons for being mis-sold.

1. Told no loan without

2 8 year loan, 5 year protection

3. No options given, nothing explained.

4. Sick pay covers absence for 6 months, same as loan protection!

 

I didn't include any calculations.

I have had a letter back - standard one.

Thank you for the letter, sorry you had to complain, if you haven't already done so fill in a questionnaire. We will update again in 4 weeks and aim to send full response in 8 weeks.

Those reasons are good enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right 8% on the payments I made, plus the return of the initial premium, right?

5,413.32 & 5945.10=11358.42

 

Not quite...what you will get back to you is the amount shown on the spreadsheet. The remainder of the loan is restructured to remove the remaining PPI part of the loan

Another question if I may.

I completed the questionnaire from HSBC websire (its the obudsman one) and sent it to the bank with a letter outlining my reasons for being mis-sold.

1. Told no loan without

2 8 year loan, 5 year protection

3. No options given, nothing explained.

4. Sick pay covers absence for 6 months, same as loan protection!

 

I didn't include any calculations.

I have had a letter back - standard one.

Thank you for the letter, sorry you had to complain, if you haven't already done so fill in a questionnaire. We will update again in 4 weeks and aim to send full response in 8 weeks.

Those reasons are good enough?

 

Yep

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

What you will end up getting back is the premium itself, plus the interest the bank have charged you thus far plus 8% on the payments you have actually made.

 

It will be made up of premiums and interest paid thus far plus the 8% and the remainder of the loan is restructured so that your as yet unpaid ppi doesn't get paid.

 

You actually didn't make an up front payment...the money to make that single premium payment was loaned to you over the lifetime of the loan.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I received my offer today.

£5562. including interest of 8%. I'll have to tell the taxman about that!!!

However there is a loan balnce less PPI refund which they are taking 946.16 leaving me £4616.08.

Is that right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been given two options. Pay the remainder off my loan, or let them do a credit check to restructure my loan and pay into my account. Can they take into account any of my other debts (disputed or not)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok so they are planning to set off against an overdraft.

 

If the loan has been run correctly and there are no arrears then no set off is allowed. All they should do is restructure the remainder of the loan to remove the PPI payment part. You should not be signing any new agreement etc etc...it is a simple maths equation from their point of view.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...