Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

landlord still demanding rent


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all we were served a po-cession notice after having our land lord served with a harassment notice and the environmental health had kittens because of the conditions in which we were living , so he through us out but before he did that he called housing benifit and said we had never paid him any money, they stopped payments to us straight away with no contact ,now we have left and he is continuing to be abusive to us, an even called my town clerk pretending to be a old friend wanting my new address she was willing issue statment to police confirming this and the police say because we owe money they will not do anything ,now we have been told we owe 3grand in rent arreas damge to property , via letting agent we contacted to try to stop any more harassnment .what should we do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi boggey1

 

We need some more information to advise:

 

1. What type of Tenancy Agreement did you have?.

2. Start Date of Tenancy?

3. End Date of Tenancy?

4. Was Move In Inventory Check done and documented?

5. Was Move Out Inventory Check done and documented?

6. Exactly what was the Posession Order recieved and Date?

7. Do you have reciepts for all payments made to Landlord?

8. Have you logged all incidents?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

turned into a periodic short term tenancy, never signed the tenancy inventory as damaged items not on the inventory , possession notice all leagle ,documented all instances of abuse .recorded occasions on phone , separate statements from friends he abused, previous tenants he abused willing to go to court ,no receipts paid cash in to bank account, coppers say civil over money have this from inspector of Newquay say he is okay to call us hound us as over money .

Link to post
Share on other sites

boggey1. General observations

 

1 Who instigated harrassment notice with Police? For what reasons?

2 If EH had 'kittens' (serious concerns) over your living conditions, they could have issued LL with an Order to prevent letting or Stat Notice to undertake repairs within a timescale up to 3 mo. Did they do either?

3 You have failed to answer most of Stu007's questions

4 You declined to sign inventories because damaged items were not included. Omission of items would have worked in your favour in any dispute.

5 Since you don't refer to ex-landlord, can we assume you still occupy his property?

6 If you have left/or not, LL is entitled to 'hunt you down' (legally pursue unpaid debts)

7 You state possession notice was legal, so you must have obtained some paralegal opinion

8 Has LL obtained a Court repo order?

Whilst advice here is free, assume the Forum is charging you Solic rate of £100+ / hr, so be concise and open.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all not ready for such help, Usually I feel a bit alone offering help to others, not really any good at asking for it lol. Right moved in 14th of feb 2009 ,only accepted by him as dss because I was having to be looked after by partner an child because of chemo treatment for cancer.15th feb LL called saying the neighbours have complained as our dog had defecated in there garden this was a lie, as neighbour had there own issues with LL as he abused them as well ,we think he did it to alis-it a response against them from us. They rung to ask if the fence could be put up as lying on the grass ,we fixed fence .ask LL to sign inventory as it needed amending and he refused .Continued to harass us swearing moaning about trivial things bangin on the door all the time, 9;20 pm the latest to tell us he was going to keep our deposit as he had kept the neighbours .

We informed the police of his behaviour and was told civil matter On two occasions we were turned away.

November 2010 took leagal advise and was told if we do anything he will put us on the streets using the housing act as we were in a periodic short term tenancy .

November 2010 was strong enough to ask our mp to contact County council housing to help as they had done nothing .He then got us appointment with housing officer (January 2011,)with Council,he sent the housing act to LL and mp wrote direct to him explaining his behaviour was not expectable.

17th of may 2011 a inspection took place by a independent health inspector for the environmental health ,he found three category two hazards ,damp and mould growth ,excess cold and crowding and space .

The council intended to use formal notice powers to require the necessary improvements.

this never happened .

we also asked him if he would contact police in regard to harassment ,he did and on the 12th of july after WPC told me on no account was i to record him being abusive on my phone and she told me to stop.I stated it was for my own protection ,she didn't care .but after asking her to take advise from her acting Sargent, she called to say she had issued a harassment notice to him" he didn't take it to well" her words .

this worked .

On 12th august 2011 LL bangs the door down and tells us " I know you only have a week here but in want my £800 you owe me ?" we ask what he was on about and he ran away telling us to ring the letting agent .We did and he said he had evidence that we had been served with a possession notice to leave I asked for the evidence we had been served with such a order he said he had evidence we had been served it when I asked could I have it he put the phone down ,the next day My partner rang and he said he would arrange another one to us after he explained that he tells his secretary to post it not recorded just post box .we then had it stuffed through the letter box .

Checked and it was a legle notice ,but does state he needs to move in to the property LL'S never ever do this and abuse the housing act. We then went and slept on my parents conservatory floor .

October continued to call my partner saying he was going to hunt us down and find where we are living .

Reported it to police and got the fobb off civil matter I know its not as served notice . left it then Jan 2012 starts again saying is is going hunt us down to hand us court papers ,

jan 2012 LL called my town clerk as I'm a Councillor asking if he can post letters to me there and pretended to be a old school friend to try and get our new address . Called police same WPC as before she said my town clerk was unable to tell it was him from the recording on my phone even though she would offer a statement to confirm it was him . Then received a letter from inspector 23 jan in reply to my letter stating LL was still harassing us ,to say that because we acknowledged we may owe him money after he rang housing benfit an stated we had not paid him they stopped all payments for the last 2 months .

we have since been contacted by the letting agent asking for new address ,but have collected hand written details saying we owe 3 thousand. 800 for damage to the property on leaving rest in rent . what do we do I want to go to court and being of strict morals and sound judgement look forward to it ,sorry for it being so long with bad grammar and spelling but chemo has left me a hands wreaked

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...