Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

9 year old/road accident


legoearth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Our daughter was hit by a motorbike 18 months ago.

 

It broke her leg and she had lacrations to her scalp .

she spent 3 days in hospital.

She was then in plaster for 6 months.

I wasn't with her, she was with her 12 year old sister and their friends.

It was a dual carriage way that was undergoing major changes to it's crossings.

It was a road they had crossed many times and had already crossed it twice that day, once with me.

 

The problem at the time was that all the pedestrian crossings had been blocked off.

The place where she was knocked down was where the crossing should have been.

It was blocked but it was partly opened where they were working on it.

The whole area ws in chaos with no safe crossings in easy walking distance,lanes blocked so traffic bottle necked.

 

The rider wasn't speeding, she just hadn't seen him coming.

Her sister says he was hidden from view behind a car.

 

Now we are at a stage where I feel more and more angry that the company 'improving' the road didn't provide alternative crossings at the point that is the most frequently used.

 

Our daugher is left with a scar on her lag that she can't bare to touch or look at.

She doesn't wear skirts or shorts and is dreading her 'junior prom' in July.

 

I don't suppose compensation would help or if she would be entitled to it

bu I would like help in putting together a letter that might make them take some responsibility so it doesn't happen again in the future to somebody elses child.

 

I was supposed to be invited to a meeting when the road works were over to put ovr some of the safty points I had highlighted in an email before Christmas 2010.

Nothing ever came of it though.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would think highways or the local council will be interested to hear the crossing was not closed properly with no alt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council were aware. I had contacted members of the team involved in the improvements, that is why I was supposed to be invited to a meeting. I suppose I was a bit apathetic really and should have chased it up but life goes on and stuff happens. It was only when she started to worry abour what she would wear for her prom and wouldn't show me her scar that I started to think about it again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As she was 9, the Insurance company of the Motorcyle may be liable for her ongoing medical needs and compensation. You should speak to a no win no fee solicitors, with a view to looking into this. They may also be willing to look into the issue of the crossing, if there is any liability there.

 

This won't be a quick process, but is something you should start as soon as possible.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Council would be ultimately responsible, were taking about 'roadworks', contractors were hired to carry out the work, if you think they have been negligent, i.e. Health & Safety etc, then write a Formal Letter of Complaint to them send it Recorded. You could send a similar letter to the 'Motorcycle Insurance company' if you feel that they have responsibilty in this matter. Here are some tips:- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1242161/How--write-letter-complaint.html

 

Further info here:- http://www.lgo.org.uk/making-a-complaint/

 

Lets us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit unfair though, it was not the motorcyclists fault that someone stepped out in front of them.

 

I think whoever closed the crossing is to blame.

 

Something in the back of my mind suggests that vehicle Insurers can often be liable for pedestrians on the road. It could be argued that given the roadworks that the motorcyclist should have been aware of the road conditions at the time and ridden in a way, that considers the possibility of people crossing the road.

 

Whether the motorcyclist was totally to blame for this, this is not something that we can determine on CAG. It would be up to the OP as parent/guardian to make enquiries on their daughters behalf to make sure they safeguard her interests.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something in the back of my mind suggests that vehicle Insurers can often be liable for pedestrians on the road. It could be argued that given the roadworks that the motorcyclist should have been aware of the road conditions at the time and ridden in a way, that considers the possibility of people crossing the road.

 

Whether the motorcyclist was totally to blame for this, this is not something that we can determine on CAG. It would be up to the OP as parent/guardian to make enquiries on their daughters behalf to make sure they safeguard her interests.

 

 

 

I agree, the best chance of success is to claim against the motorcyclist's insurer but still won't be easy. I don't think the OP would get very far claiming against the Council.

 

Plenty of solicitors that will act on a No Win No Fee if the OP Googles it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be aware that if you do go for a civil claim it is quite likely that as parents, you will be brought into the claim for lack of supervision etc.

 

You have already stated that it was a busy dual carriageway, that you had already crossed it once that day and you knew that the crossings were not in action and that it was in chaos. Stating that the child was adequately supervised may not cary too much weight given the accident happened... (i am certainly not saying you were at fault, just assessing the likely possible outcomes and what the defendants will do).

 

You may well have some success against the m/c and possible the council, but not without a fight and you may also face a finding of liability against you in a civil claim of which you will have to pay the damages to your daughter either from any insurance you have or savings etc. Plus as soon you are accused of any lack of supervision, you will have to find someone else to represent your daughter in court/the proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should heed the advice from Endymion before you take this any further. When I posted, I really did not think of this issue, but yes if you complained, this could turn against you. Whilst this may not be fair, I can see them doing it, if there is any suggestion of liability.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the feedback. Yes I know that really I should have been with her and I'm pretty sure the council would point this out if I persued it. I suppose I was just 'letting off steam' as she has crossed that road with her firends and sister may times before,it's the way to school. it would never have happened if there had been a crossing open.

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your best bet is down the medical road. Have you sought to discuss the ongoing distress your child is having with the unsightliness of the scar with your gp/treating consultant?

 

Counselling is good for kids with these problems and a good plastic surgeon may well be able to clean up any redness and cosmetic scarring, but with age these things fade reasonably well, but i truly understand that this is hard to explain to a 9yr old girl.

 

Good luck and I hope that your daughter makes a good recovery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...