Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dvla failure to notify.


swanseafan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4425 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Blimey, you are leaving things a bit late to come here.

 

There are many threads on this. This is among the better ones. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?319264-DVLA-Failure-to-notify-Advice-required.

 

Interpretations Act.

 

You did all the Law required - you mailed it, they are deemed to have received it.

 

Don't get fobbed off by the DVLA Prosecutor trying to do a lesser deal outside the doors beforehand.

 

Don't let the DVLA Prosecutor fob off the Magistrates about 'deliver' or you doing anything if you hear nothing in 4 weeks of mailing it. There are no such Laws.

 

Let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi court was adjourned till the 7th march.

i had everything in place to aruge the wording of send, and the interpretation act.

will have to wait for a few weeks.

 

is there anything else i could use??

 

130 people was listed in swansea, only 15/20 people turned up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have emailed the dvla and ask for the following information under the freedom of information act.

 

how many times have the dvla lost/miss placed mail in the last year, how many people have the dvla taken to court in the last year for failure to inform them of change of keeper, and how many vehicles have changed keepers in the last year.

wonder what reply i will get??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello SwanseaFan Get in there ! I wish it was me again because DVLA really need to be taught a lesson. I would be tempted to present an honest but meek case to the magistrates in a hope that the DVLA might win the first round because the appeal to the Crown Court is the place to do their dishonest practice the most damage. They tried to pull out of my appeal at the last minute but the judge would not let them and demanded to know why they had taken it thus far ! They had to make assurances that they were not using the law courts effectively as a bullying tool which of course we know they are.

 

Getting them back at Crown court a few times will cause the judges to get really angry and do something about it.

 

Best wishes Paul Kennedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

went to court and lost!!!

i got confused about dates, the laywers also used this thread as well lol.

i was in a bit of a state, so the bench said take a min or stop, so i finished and was found guilty. i did not read more than 2 lines from my statement!!

the laywer used the section under the address(dvla) many times where it state if you have not heard anything after four week to phone the dvla, i did try and explain that by posting it ive done my part.

so can i appeal? and how would i go about this?

what would the costs be?

and to the dvla who read the threads, i did post it.

not happy at being bullied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your feelings - you 'got done up'.

 

Others will be more constructive than I (not my province) particularly Paul Kennedy about the costs etc of an Appeal.

I hope you appeal and possibly get your case presented by someone who will not be flustered by a 'pro' who presents wrong arguments in Court as a full time living every day. (How do they sleep soundly at night?)

 

This is another golden opportunity to try to get an Appeal Court to make a legal precedent that must be followed by lower Courts.

 

If you appeal you can expect all sorts of offers (once the threats die away) from DVLA right up to the Courtroom doors, to prevent a Judge getting to hear your case, require DVLA to answer and then make a Ruling.

 

Sensibly and calmly presented I am certain you will win.

I am prepared to chip in something towards unrecovered costs - exactly as I offered for Paul, but heard no more.

 

Bear in mind the inefficiency of DVLA has now given you a Criminal Record. That can have consequences for you now or in the years ahead - reason enough to fight it in my book.

Edited by Tony P
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply and pms.

yes i will appeal, and i will still take any advice.

i have a criminal record and work in care!!

how do i arrange a group of people to talk me though this? i was not good in court.

i have been chatting to people on here, and please pm or mail me,

lets get something sorted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had you obtained a certificate of posting, would this have prevented your conviction?

 

It seems a nice little earner when the government owned postal service, or the governments car based profit factory mess up - but can blame it on the person who posted it.

 

Where does the "call in a month to check" bit come from - if its not a law how can you comply with it - or be convicted for something using that as part proof of guilt.

 

Did your FoI request come back in time, or perhaps you should call up after a month has passed, perhaps call the judge at home a month later to tell him how you are getting on, or call...

Link to post
Share on other sites

he asked where i sent the form off to, is said dvla, which address so i read from my other car document, under the address it says if you have not heard from the dvla after 4 weeks to phone or write, should read the small print lol. i did say its not law and not required

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the Site does not approve, I trust they will see the sence of allowing the OP and others persuing this matter 'off thread'.

 

The OP would have to be happy of the bona fides of those who contact him (length of time as a CAGer and content and quality of posts are a fair indicator) to avoid including a 'plant'.

 

Maybe a non specific progress report would be helpful to those with a positive interest in this case and appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

think there was a lot of no shows, wonder how much the dvla made in 2011 by going to court alone?

 

When people have been to Court, they say something like 6 to 12 turn up out of 60 - 100 cases listed.

 

Was the 40,000 cases they took to Court the total of all offences - or just the alleged failure to send back the V5C on transfer?

 

But DVLA do not get the fines the Court imposes - they go directly to central government. DVLA might be awarded a small amount of 'costs'.

This is why they try to do an 'out of Court settlement' even at the doors, they get that money.

 

Once in the Court, the DVLA interest becomes only the deterrent statistics to frighten others - into accepting out of Court settlements!

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was just for failure to notify, they also got costs at £90 a go!!! thats nearly £4 million in legal costs

plus the victim surcharge £15 a lot of money going somewhere.

40k people fined thats mininum of £4million

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...