Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx It's with Step Change. Yes that is the balance outstanding plus interest.
    • Hi All, I don't want to keep asking unnecessary and daft questions but as I read up on on stuff to prepare my defence and tthink about my witness statement, I am perusing the following: The BPA Code of practice states under 13. Consideration and Grace Periods: 13.1 The driver must have the chance to consider the Terms and Conditions before entering into the ‘parking contract’ with you. If, having had that opportunity, the driver decides not to park but chooses to leave the car park, you must provide them with a reasonable consideration period to leave, before the driver can be bound by your parking contract. The amount of time in these instances will vary dependant on site size and type but it must be a minimum of 5 minutes. 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place.   Let's say a motorist spends a minimum of 5 minutes to decide, then decides to park, that 5 minutes now doesn't apply? That doesn't make sense to me. So now that a motorist has parked after consideration, thus commencing the parking period, the decision time doesn't apply and parking time commenced when? .... on entry to the car park? This, as far as I can see is not stated in the [Withdrawn] Government document which says: The Code also makes clear that the consideration period ends at the point when the driver has parked and is therefore considered to have accepted the terms and conditions, which could be within the five-minute allowance. Doesn't say anything about it not applying if a parking event takes place.   [Withdrawn] Private Parking Code of Practice: explanatory document – how was it developed and what will it change? - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK So, according to the BPA, if a motorist inadvertently overstayed by 12 minutes for example, they have the 10 minute grace period but because they decided to park, they don't have the 5 minute consideration period because they decided to park and have overstayed by 2 minutes? Sorry if there's something I'm missing here.  
    • there are several threads here already whereby the judge in such cases only made an order to pay the required sum, the registering of a criminal record is at their discretion or not. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2948 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I'm new here and after some advice. I was made redundant from my job last September through no fault of my own and been signing on ever since.

 

However, before Christmas I had an appointment with my advisor at my local job centre and gave me details of a job to apply for but 2 weeks ago I received a letter saying that they are going to stop my job seekers allowance from the end of January to the middle of march. I have since appealed the decision in writing but when i went to the job centre today I had to fill in another form and explain again.

 

I know it was my fault for not applying for the job, but I always complete the booklet and attend the job centre on a regular basis to sign on.

 

Any advice?

 

Thanks

 

Louise

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They have obviously applied a sanction to your JSA for not applying for said job. As long as the job is one for which your are suitable essentially you need to apply for it. If there was any reason why you were not suitable the Jobcentre should not apply any sanctions. I assume you simply forgot to apply or was there any other reason ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a few appointments with some recruitment agencies during that time and the job was for something that i hadn't done for several years and wasn't recent enough.

 

I guess I'll have to wait and see now to see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as i understand it, if you have an interview arranged by the job centre and you fail to attend then you are probably seen as not actively seeking employment, and the benefits you recieve are made on the basis that you are actively seeking work, anyone can put any rubbish in their sign on book such as looked in papers looked on internet, looked in windows for work etc etc, and as genuine as i am sure you are, the job centre is aware of all those who are not and will stop you payment, but of course i hope have it all sorted now

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

A few months I posted on here about the job centre stopping my JSA, however since then I've now got a job and was wondering what i should do about appealing against decision as I've received a letter today from the tribunal service.

 

I know it's my decision at the end of the day, but just wanted some advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You appealed it at the time so you must have felt strongly about it. Do you still feel like that?

 

I felt strongly at the time about the decision but still unsure about pursuing it further by going ahead with the tribunal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I last posted here on this site at the end of November last year, but unfortunately my temporary job I had has ended so have to go back to my local job centre to sign on etc :-(

 

Has much changed since then re how many jobs you have to apply for etc with the universal job match system being in place.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I registered with a recruitment agency last week and because I have been unemployed during the last three years (off and on due to having done temporary work), the agency wants a letter confirming the dates that I claimed JSA. I had a appointment with a personal adviser at my local job centre and she gave me a letter of the dates. However when I went to the agency they weren't able to accept it as the dates were wrong as instead of being June 2012, the job centre put 2013.

 

I went back to the job centre to try and get it sorted but have only been able to give me the dates from last year and was given a 0845 number to ring up. I rang them up and said that they would send the details through the post but the agency said the job centre should be do this for me instead of having to ring the 0845 number.

 

Has anyone had issues like this before between the job centre and recruitment agency?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Louise

 

It sounds very strange that the agency is wanting proof of you claiming JSA - I'm registered with various agencies and though they naturally ask for a cv, none of them have asked any questions whatsoever regarding my benefits or how long I've been claiming.

 

Have you tried asking the agency - and the jobcentre - why this information is needed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds very strange that the agency is wanting proof of you claiming JSA.

 

Have you tried asking the agency - and the jobcentre - why this information is needed?

 

It does indeed sound a little odd. I've only ever been asked by one body for proof of JSA dates, and that was by HMRC as part of an income tax review. The only reason I can think of for an agency asking is to check on gaps in employment that might point to time spent in prison.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've signed on to many agencies since being unemployed (and long before then) and this is the first I have heard of them wanting confirmation of dates of JSA entitlement - sounds very very wrong.

 

Ask them why they want this information and then report them to local Trading Standards - it is not a requirement of a DRS (used to be CRB) check to cover periods of unemployment that I am aware of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every time you signed off you should have received a Tax notification P45? from the job centre or the agency. Perhaps the agency has been a bit naughty and not supplied this at the time and now require it for tax purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the email said from the agency regarding JSA:

 

3 Years reference details from date of registration. Please have with you the following:

 

* Previous Employers and dates you worked there (From and to), Contact Details, i.e.; Contact Name, Address, Telephone and Fax Number, Email Address etc

* If you have been claiming JSA please bring a letter with you to prove your claim. ALSO please ring the Job Seeker Line NOW and request a “Date of Claim” letter covering the last 3 YEARS.

 

* We cannot have a gap with no proof of what you were doing for more than 3 months.

 

* If you have been in university you must bring with you your certificate of degree and transcripts as well as a contact email address for your tutor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the email said from the agency regarding JSA:

 

3 Years reference details from date of registration. Please have with you the following:

 

* Previous Employers and dates you worked there (From and to), Contact Details, i.e.; Contact Name, Address, Telephone and Fax Number, Email Address etc

* If you have been claiming JSA please bring a letter with you to prove your claim. ALSO please ring the Job Seeker Line NOW and request a “Date of Claim” letter covering the last 3 YEARS.

 

* We cannot have a gap with no proof of what you were doing for more than 3 months.

 

* If you have been in university you must bring with you your certificate of degree and transcripts as well as a contact email address for your tutor.

 

I think my suspicions are correct as the agency are supposed to request a P45 when you start working for the agency. The P45 is issued to you by the Job Centre when you stop claiming. It should be all the prrof the agency require. The agency have slipped up and are now trying to squirm out of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can sign on to an agency WITHOUT having a P45 from the Jobcentre, I think wires have been crossed here.

 

They state that they cannot have a gap with no proof of what you were doing for more than 3 months - sounds unreasonable to me as they are (I hope) purely there to help you find work rather than you working directly for them.

 

If this is the case give them a CV highlighting where you were unemployed and state that that is it, if they continue asking for paperwork to cover periods ask them for the same and see what they say then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can sign on to an agency WITHOUT having a P45 from the Jobcentre, I think wires have been crossed here.

 

They state that they cannot have a gap with no proof of what you were doing for more than 3 months - sounds unreasonable to me as they are (I hope) purely there to help you find work rather than you working directly for them.

 

If this is the case give them a CV highlighting where you were unemployed and state that that is it, if they continue asking for paperwork to cover periods ask them for the same and see what they say then!

 

Just to clarify, there is no issue with signing on but if the agency find employment, then a P45 from the Job Centre should be handed to the agency and they should process it as it gives the tax bracket otherwise you end up paying "emergency tax" which is at a higher rate. You do not have to hand it to the agency when you start work, but should do so at the earliest opportunity. A check should show that a P45 was issued by the job centre every time you signed off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...