Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent Help!! RBS Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, hope someone has some advice.

Please ignore ramblings but I think it is important that you know the background info.

My Partner and I had just been given a council property in October last year after private renting for many years. It was a shell had had to be decorated from top to bottom. Luckily I had just changed jobs and got some outstanding wages from my previous job and a tax return I had waited on for almost 2 years. This totalled to coulpe of thousand punds which would come in handy.

I have two accounts with RBS, 1 with a £2000 OD and the other with a £700 OD.

 

In the middle of November last year I received a letter stating that I was outside my overdraft limit and would incur charges of £276 on the 1st of December. I contacted my bank who told me that my overdraft had been reduced from £2000 to £1800 at the start of October. I received no letter or information regarding this.

 

At the end of November I was paid £907, I only earn minimun wage, and brought the account back within the overdraft limit ny lodging £198 in the account( Great Xmas we had). I also wrote to the bank explaining that I had received no information regarding this and that had I known about it I would have brought the account within the OD limit as I had some spare cash at the time. I explained that I may be losing my job in December and could not afford to pay the charges as they would put my family in hardship. I also stated I thuought the charges were unfair due to the amount owed being higher that what I had originally gone outside of the OD. I also stated that the bank had made no attempt to contact me regarding this matter, by mail, telephone or E-mail.

 

Their immediate response, in December by letter, stated simply "NO" to charge refund or cancellation and due to me informing them of my financial situation that my account would be passed to their debt collection office.

 

Since then the charges have increased. I have had telephone calls, letters and E-mails. All of which they didn't do to notify me of the problem.

 

On Saturday 28/01/12 I received a call from RBS. I asked if it was being recorded and this was confirmed. My partner was also listening t the conversation on loudspeaker and taking notes. We went through my financial situation and income, to which I explained I have none at present but start a new job on the 6th so would have at the end of February. I must explain that apart from some Council Tax arrears I have no other debts, excpet RBS. As I listed my annual salary and monthly commitments the figures showed a negative income, mainly due to the substantial amount I pay the Sheriff's Officers each month for my CT. I was told that they could not arrange a repayment agreement as I showed a negative income. I then asked if they could call me back in a couple of weeks once I know how much I will be getting paid and have renegotiated with the Sheriff's Officers as to how much I can reduce my payments of CT. I was then told that no agreement meant a default being filed and that I would have 28 days to open a new account elsewhere. Unaware of what this meant at the time I merely agreed.

 

I have since had 2 default notice charges, one on each account even thought other account which my wages get paid into was not discussed.

 

I want to fight this as I believe the charges are unfair. I cannot afford to pay these charges but if I don't they are going to bankrupt me, which I do no want.

 

Any useful advice would be much appreciated.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...